I was just pointing out the OP's source. Are you telling me I got it wrong about the integrity of his source?
Ivermectin for treating covid19
- Thread starter isutrevman
- Start date
- Status
I was just pointing out the OP's source. Are you telling me I got it wrong about the integrity of his source?
What I'm telling you is that the Mods should be making him post this in the cave (if anywhere) so that you can freely point out the integrity of his source without recrimination. I have no problem with you. I would note that there are *some* sources reporting test results supporting that Ivermectin could be helpful in treating COVID which are far more reputable than Fox News, but that is a different matter.
That is a very informative article that I hadn't seen before. Interesting that it had been published back in June 2020. Thanks for posting it.
The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro
Although several clinical trials are now underway to test possible therapies, the worldwide response to the COVID-19 outbreak has been largely limited…www.sciencedirect.com
The OP probably posted it here because unlike the cave, you have to engage in actual rationa civill debate rather than simply launching endless barrages of ad hominem attacks.
I don't approve of endless barrages of ad hominem attacks, but it has been demonstrated time and time again that some of the wet farters are posting in Off Topic because they believe that the Mods will allow then to inject their politics into the threads and will prevent those thinking otherwise from doing the same. It has happened time and time again and it will happen again with this thread eventually. There's no reason that rational debate can't occur in the cave. You've made my point--Off Topic is not supposed to be a place for debate. He knows all of this. His postings have resulted in numerous threads being closed or removed. He is a coward.
The "source" is a medical doctor testifying in an open government forum that happens to be being broadcast by FOX. Would you be complaining about it if it was CNN instead of FOX? You can dispute/affirm his assertions on a completely scientific basis without bringing politics into the discussion.. The "FOX News as a source" objection is total BS.
Here is the video as posted on youtube.com without any reference to a host other than youtube.com. However, youtube.com might be considered by some as a biased host. The message is the same regardless of who has hosted the video.
Last edited:
Mask compliance is as high as it's ever been and has been illustrated to be ineffective. Social distancing and avoiding crowded indoor places is nearly 100% effective. Hopefully the vaccine won't kill very many.
The efficacy of masks is a forbidden topic in these Off Topic threads. I believe @Angie has spoken clearly on that.
Let's just play by the rules, son. You think she doesn't know what is going on ? She doesn't need me to report to her. She sees you when you're sleeping. She knows when you're awake. She knows if you've been bad or good.
Don't tell me, tell the person who brought it into the debate.
That doesn't matter. You can't comment on it.I don't make the rules, but I know they will be enforced. This illustrates why these discussions should be had in the political forum.
And I said I don't approve of endless barrages of ad hominem. So my single post is an endless barrage? The OP has earned my comment with months of posting. Beyond that I don't particularly care what you think.
There was neither chiropractors or witch doctors (same thing really) in that link so how does this apply?????
Rational discussion in the cave? I stand a better chance getting Benji and buddy to be rational and civil in the ISR forums.
How does one "earn" an ad hominem attack? I missed that in speech/debate class. Granted, it was decades ago when I took those classes, so things might have changed.
- Status
