Legalize weed. Money problem solved. Pay for all the road work.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Prioritizing transportation funds between maintenance and capital investments *and* where to make capital investments is a nightmarish and difficult process even for well-intended people trying to do a good and fair job regardless of political concerns.
All that being said, I come down with @alarson on this one.
According to this, average daily traffic on US-20...
https://iowadot.gov/maps/msp/traffic/2015/counties/SAC.pdf
...through Sac County is roughly 4,500 vehicles.
According to this site...
http://www.mikeontraffic.com/numbers-every-traffic-engineer-should-know/
2-lane = 24.6% capacity factor
4-lane = 12.2% capacity factor
That is heinously overbuilt. Pouring money into US-20, which was perfectly serviceable towards meeting the infrastructure needs of northwest Iowa, when there are developing problems (nothing compared to the East Coast, but for Iowa standards, yes) in the Ames and Des Moines area, between Waterloo and Iowa City, and with the bridges over the Mississippi and the Missouri, is an obnoxiously stupid use of money compared to the alternatives.
Highway 17 (the one that goes from US-30 between Boone and Ames south through Madrid, Granger, Grimes, and then into Des Moines) is increasingly becoming one of the important "back doors" into the area. It is two-lanes through Granger and already up to 6,400 per day according to the maps. It has 50% more traffic yet half the capacity of 20 right now.
Yeesh.
30 carries at least 5,900 all the way through the county yet only the eastern quarter is 4 lane. Not to mention the topography makes it very hard to pass safely. Same story in Tama county where parts of it carry 7k. Yes these areas are finally getting worked on but the point stands IMO.
I also don't understand why we can't just add short length passing lanes every once in a while instead of spending the money and land developing huge 4 lane highways that won't ever carry close to a 50% load.
Great! That'll be a huge improvement.First time I've been up to a game in a long time. I see that the steel is all connected fully. So it at least all fit together. Just have to set up the pad and pave it. It might finally be done for football season.![]()
Nah, it's gonna be like rainbow road up there.It looks like it is going to be terribly icy on bitter winter days as it sits up in the air with nothing by cold wind whipping around it. Hope that have high barricades on the sides!
Nah, it's gonna be like rainbow road up there.
now that song is stuck in my head!Nah, it's gonna be like rainbow road up there.
The typical barrier height for interstate and flyover type bridges is 44" (3'-8").It looks like it is going to be terribly icy on bitter winter days as it sits up in the air with nothing by cold wind whipping around it. Hope that have high barricades on the sides!
..........Adding lanes to roads has proven over and over again to temporarily add capacity, and long term increases the amount of traffic on the road. So putting money into making I80 between Des Moines and Iowa City 6 lanes rather then to get Hwy 30 up to 4 lanes in Benton County would be foolish, IMO. Finishing Hwy 30 should alleviate some traffic on 80.
Also, these decisions are made by the entire legislature during budget, not just one politician, so a majority of the legislature agreed that project was necessary.
I agree 100% that making HWY 30 four lanes between HWY 218 and Tama will alleviate a lot of traffic from I-80 between Altoona and Ia City. I drive between eastern Iowa and Des Moines weekly and I currently split taking HWY 30 and I-80. Once HWY 30 is 4 lanes I will never take I-80, just to avoid the truck traffic.
I travel quite a bit and I would say I35 from East Mix to Ames 13th St is crazier than East side of Altoona to IA City. IA City to the river is bad too.Regardless I-80 needs to be 6 lanes from at least Des Moines to Iowa City and realistically at least to the I-74 interchange in Davenport. Driving on that highway with all of those trucks is just insanity.
Priority of going to three lanes should be:
1. 380 between Iowa City and CR
2. 80 Between 380 and 74
3. 35 Between 80 and hwy 30
4. 80 Between 35 and Iowa City.
So, doing nothing will fix the problem? Somehow, I don't think that's how that works.Increased lanes only adds more traffic. Just like more prisons creates more prisoners. Induced demand:
https://www.wired.com/2014/06/wuwt-traffic-induced-demand/
The problem is they assume that the expansion causes increased traffic when the traffic was going to increae regardless. If they don’t expand the road it just means more stress in different places.So, doing nothing will fix the problem? Somehow, I don't think that's how that works.