Hey hawk fans....

I think what Stewo was talking about in his first post was that Hawks come into threads that have nothing to do with them and turn it into a crap fest. Yes, there are many, many ISU fans who start Hawk threads on here. Rarely does a week go by without a "This is why Hawks suck..." or "Who do you think will start for the Hawkeyes at weak outside linebacker?" thread showing up. It's the trolls that pollute non-Hawk threads and turn them into Hawk-Clone diatribes that we cannot stand.

I NEVER, turn a clone thread into a hawk thread unless the hawks are mentioned or portrayed in a negative or, more importantly, inaccurate way. I only respond to false allegations for the most part. I can understand frustration with hawk trolls, but again, most respond to a false, or at least unsupported, claim by ISU fans. If those false claims/mentions are cut out, I guarantee you hawk fans will cease to exist, I know I would at least.
 
Oh THERE'S a good idea... why don't you make Bubba a mod too while you're at it? I guarantee there won't be any Hawk fans here anymore.

Not true. I'd keep the ones that don't have an agenda and that come here and actually have something worth reading.
 
Nothing about the hawkeyes was mentioned in the following posts that you participated in.

"Your top 10 video games"
"Unforgettable one liners in movies"


You started the thread "CFN ranks best QB's in 2009"

Did I mention anything about Iowa in the top 10 videogames thread or the unforgettable one liners in movies thread? NO!

I started the CFN ranks best QB's in 2009 thread in response to the thread claiming that Austin Arnaud was far and away a better QB than Stanzi, which is not the case in the eyes of some objective sources. That thread was dead and buried by the time the article came out, so instead of digging it up I simply started a new thread, which by the way, ranked all QB's not simply Ricky Stanzi.
 
No, but you are trying to tear down Iowa to make yourself feel better about being a cyclone fan......which is precisely one of the reason Hawk fans come to this website.....to defend our team from your propaganda.
ROFLMAO...that's great...propaganda??

If you wouldn't constantly tell me how great your team is and maybe be a little humble from time to time, I wouldn't feel the need to knock you off your pedastal.
 
Did I mention anything about Iowa in the top 10 videogames thread or the unforgettable one liners in movies thread? NO!

I started the CFN ranks best QB's in 2009 thread in response to the thread claiming that Austin Arnaud was far and away a better QB than Stanzi, which is not the case in the eyes of some objective sources.
Ha! If you want objectivity, you've definitely come to the wrong place. We don't believe in that sort of BS around here.
 
Did I mention anything about Iowa in the top 10 videogames thread or the unforgettable one liners in movies thread? NO!
.

When you said "if there were NEVER a mention of the Hawkeyes on this site again, I would never post again" I took that as a sign that you had no interest in anything on this site that wasn't hawk related.
 
The main thing that bothers me is when the Hawkeyes are mentioned in any sort of negative way, most hawk fans tend to say, "Well, ISU sucks.. Iowa is better than ISU.. Look at the January bowls.. Iowa has more tradition, blah blah blah blah, ISU sucks.." Trust us.. We get it, Iowa football has had much more success than ISU in football. I, for one, definitely do not need to be reminded of our lack of success in football.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rdubbs
I NEVER, turn a clone thread into a hawk thread unless the hawks are mentioned or portrayed in a negative or, more importantly, inaccurate way. I only respond to false allegations for the most part. I can understand frustration with hawk trolls, but again, most respond to a false, or at least unsupported, claim by ISU fans. If those false claims/mentions are cut out, I guarantee you hawk fans will cease to exist, I know I would at least.

And yet here you are. :confused: