I was thinking, can we get 4 more wins and get in a bowl? Maybe. Cincinnati, Baylor, BYU are possible wins. Other likely wins are KSU, but we need to play our best game. Kansas looks like a tough team.
A LB covering a RB on a pass play is a recipe for disaster. A TO should have been called and when the coaches rewatch that on the film they will be kicking themselves.No way. They were in man and that is a common play. That is on the player.
We're down at LB and DE. I thought the lanky freshmen DEs added an element that we're not getting from Peterson, although I though he was better this week. Bacon should be starting at LB. Gundy's been a thorn in Heacock's side for years. They were really effective at baiting our outside contain to crash too early. We weren't disciplined at all out there, which is out of character. Our blitzes are still lacking. It was a little better today. Luckily Bowman is a bum. I'm not too worried about the D, but I was hoping for more from the young LBs this season.
As strong as our back four are, we need to be blitzing more in passing situations, yesterday we gave Bowman plenty of time, a better QB will make the throws that he was missing or throwing away. The guy is not nimble at all, and we should have been going after him.The "team" isn't bad, but based on Saturday I'd say Bowman is not "the answer" and their secondary, at best, needs to clean up some major communication issues. They blew a lot of coverages, making things much easier than they should have been.
If we give teams with competent QBs as much time as we afforded Bowman yesterday, it will be problematic. A good QB, all other things being equal, tears us apart.
They probably would have thrown the ball more against Iowa and Ohio if they would have liked our match-ups better. Thats what the game plan is based on. I don't buy the argument that Campbell is afraid to open the offense up, the staff just knows we don't have the players to be successful playing that way against most teams.OSU proved that everyone disparaging our players at skill positions (especially Rocco) were wrong. It also proved that Iowa and Ohio were both winnable if the coaching staff had opened up the offense.
Our D has had the occasional bad game but you have trust Heacock to adjust and the D to play well again. Bowman is what he is. Not all that great but has played a ton of games and can be serviceable.
This. Catching those short punts are just as good as catching it deep and returning the 20 yards. In terms of net yards, it’s the same.Liked Noel's punt returns. Often overlooked is the importance, of not muffing. The one where he ran up and full speed late in the game, maybe saving 20 yds of roll.
They probably would have thrown the ball more against Iowa and Ohio if they would have liked our match-ups better. Thats what the game plan is based on. I don't buy the argument that Campbell is afraid to open the offense up, the staff just knows we don't have the players to be successful playing that way against most teams.
I’m definitely not a Campbell hater whatsoever. I’m not pushing for his firing, so that isn’t a narrative I’m pushing for (if that’s what you’re insinuating).Pretty easy to.pick a dialog to fit your desired narrative. How about this:
- if our linebacker doesn't get beat on a wheel route you eliminate a 70 yard play?
- if our OLB, DE, and CB do what is taught from 4th grade on (turn all running plays to the inside) u eliminate a 70 yard run?
- if our RB realizes that he doesn't have a first down and doesn't dive, then the ending is totally different.
The game is probably a 30ish to 15ish game.
First time in a while you can say we legitimately won in the margins.
Or a safety adjusts because he recognized that was the match up.A LB covering a RB on a pass play is a recipe for disaster. A TO should have been called and when the coaches rewatch that on the film they will be kicking themselves.
Curious, do you trust Campbell to let Rocco just play, like he did with Brock in his first year?
Or will he revert to form, and turtle up if he ever gets up by ten points?
It took intensive pressure to get him to open it up yesterday, because at 1-3 with losses to bad teams it would have resulted in that seat REALLY heating up.
ISU will continue next week trying to run through a brick wall, and getting stuffed. WRers running routes short of the sticks, and the Oline will not hold up. OU will go back to their country trey play, pulling the backside guard and tackle and have success running the ball enough to open up their passing game.I think the more he sees of Rocco making the right decisions the more likely he keeps it up. I would, however, expect a conservative game plan against OU next week. Cause there’s a fine line between letting the kid throw and crushing his confidence against top talent teams. If the defense holds up, I think he tries to keep it close for the 4th qtr. if the defense gives up points early, he’ll give it a try sooner.
At BYU will be tough. I like our chances against Kansas at home over that game in ProvoI was thinking, can we get 4 more wins and get in a bowl? Maybe. Cincinnati, Baylor, BYU are possible wins. Other likely wins are KSU, but we need to play our best game. Kansas looks like a tough team.
AgreeISU will continue next week trying to run through a brick wall, and getting stuffed. WRers running routes short of the sticks, and the Oline will not hold up. OU will go back to their country trey play, pulling the backside guard and tackle and have success running the ball enough to open up their passing game.
Unless OU has 3 to 4 turnovers, this will be a 35-10 game.
Now what we should do is come out spreading the field, attack their defense with the pass, running RPO with the QB actually running the ball. On defense, attack the LOS and force OU to do things they do not want to do.
Defense had a bad game. Bowman over threw 3 wide open recievers for tds. Lots of wide open recievers all over the field yesterday. Leaving Bacon on Nixon without safety help was inexcusable.Defense gave up two huge plays they normally don’t…granted one was an awful scheme (cannot have a LB on a WR with no safety help) and the other was poor tackling/angles. But the defense is fine. We cannot expect to give up 9-13 points each and every week, which is why it was very important the offense take the steps they did yesterday.
Agree with this, but also if Bacon realizes he’s being put out on an island like that he needs to give a big cushion and concede the short pass. He was way too tight to the line at the snap.A LB covering a RB on a pass play is a recipe for disaster. A TO should have been called and when the coaches rewatch that on the film they will be kicking themselves.
119 pass attempts without a sack is a lot. Rocco has decent elusiveness but it’s not possible to have no sacks with that many attempts without very good pass protection. As a reference at the rate Purdy got sacked as a senior he would’ve likely been sacked 6.2 times after 119 attempts. That’s a huge difference, and I’m skeptical it can be explained that Rocco is far more elusive and able to make quick decisions than Sr Purdy.IMO the lack of sacks by opposing Defenses of Rocco is more due to Rocco’s ability to move. The pass blocking is less bad than the run blocking. But still needs a lot of work. Rocco is elusive and can throw on the move.