FB: Position changes

[snowcraig2.0]

Since when doesn't Sandvig run that well? Take a look at his rival profile Nike camp times. He is very athletic.

With Gray committing to OSU though, it's a moot point, as Sandvig needs to stay at CB to provide depth.

I am pretty happy with Catlett at TE. I have a good feeling about Colin Franklin as well. I don't see anyone from our Dline that we would bring to TE as a blocker. Means would be the most likely 3rd option.

 

[snowcraig2.0]

Schwartz is coming in to play tailback, not fullback.

 

[sdsmith4]

I think Schwartz can be called a hybrid, if you watch his videos he lines up at both the tail and the fullback spots. I think we will see him out of both spots at times during his career!!

 

[snowcraig2.0]

He is coming in to play tailback. Read his rivals info, it's one of the reasons we got him.

 

[sdsmith4]

Yes, he is coming here so he can play tailback, but I think he is someone who can also play fullback, Phil Bates came here to play QB, but guess what he played some WR too, Schwartz will be seen from both positions. Yes he is a TB, but he is a guy that can also play FB at times and I think will, especially if he is ready now as a freshman because he will definitely not be at TB. Just because someone is a "TB" or whatever it says they are that doesn't make them purely a "TB".

 

[Aclone]

Just because someone is a "TB" or whatever it says they are that doesn't make them purely a "TB".

A 4.89 forty time really doesn't suggest to me that he'll be spending any more time at tailback than Philip Bates did at uarterback his freshman year. Or Ellis Hobbs did at tailback, for that matter.

 

[snowcraig2.0]

Yes, he is coming here so he can play tailback, but I think he is someone who can also play fullback, Phil Bates came here to play QB, but guess what he played some WR too, Schwartz will be seen from both positions. Yes he is a TB, but he is a guy that can also play FB at times and I think will, especially if he is ready now as a freshman because he will definitely not be at TB. Just because someone is a "TB" or whatever it says they are that doesn't make them purely a "TB".

Honestly, I am tired of looking at your terrible grammar, so I am bowing out of this conversation.

 

[sdsmith4]

Agreed AClone, agreed!