I dont know a whole lot about coaches salaries but can isu afford to give him what an sec team would offer?
Maybe not SEC salaries but certainly more than what we are paying now. Those days of ISU living on extra tight budgets are over.
I dont know a whole lot about coaches salaries but can isu afford to give him what an sec team would offer?
Maybe not SEC salaries but certainly more than what we are paying now. Those days of ISU living on extra tight budgets are over.
I believe the more immediate problem will be keeping Manning, Heacock, and Ayeni. How does that work with assistant coaches contracts? Are they tied to Campbell's in any way or is he just given X amount of $$ to hire his staff? I do remember that JP was after (and got) a head coach who could bring his staff with him to Ames. Let's keep the entire staff here!Pay the man. Well.
I believe the more immediate problem will be keeping Manning, Heacock, and Ayeni. How does that work with assistant coaches contracts? Are they tied to Campbell's in any way or is he just given X amount of $$ to hire his staff? I do remember that JP was after (and got) a head coach who could bring his staff with him to Ames. Let's keep the entire staff here!
I think that comparison is fairly lazy, and that’s also assuming it was a bad decision to lock up Rhoads.Same thing was said about Rhoads and then everyone was pissed we did it when the bottom fell out.
Yeah, I believe Campbell is given a pool of money for his staff, then he decides how to divvy it out. That pool needs to grow along with Campbell's salary.I believe the more immediate problem will be keeping Manning, Heacock, and Ayeni. How does that work with assistant coaches contracts? Are they tied to Campbell's in any way or is he just given X amount of $$ to hire his staff? I do remember that JP was after (and got) a head coach who could bring his staff with him to Ames. Let's keep the entire staff here!
Totally agree, better pay up now. Campbell has been so complimentary of ISU and the fanbase. Time to pay him back early and show him how much we appreciate him. Otherwise we are going to lose him after next year, if not earlier
We may lose him after this year if we dont give him a new contract...remember Nebraska is looking for a coach and right now and Matt Campbell is the Hottest Coaching Property in this flippin' country...
Jamie has to pay up or lose Matt Campbell imho
Go Cyclones
I think that comparison is fairly lazy, and that’s also assuming it was a bad decision to lock up Rhoads.
People aren’t bullish on CMC because he got 8 turnovers against a mediocre NU team or beat a poor UT team. Hell, we lost to a mediocre UT team. It’s because he has a good plan and he’s executing it in all phases of program building.
We’ve got to do all we can to lock him up. In terms of the opportunity cost to the university we could justify spending almost more than any other program imo, although unfortunately we missed the days of building programs on the backs of taxpayers. Worse case scenario with paying to keep him is we’re right where we have been from historically not paying.
The hottest coaching candidate isn’t going to Nebraska. That’s like winning a nice lottery and blowing it all on the Poweball.We may lose him after this year if we dont give him a new contract...remember Nebraska is looking for a coach and right now and Matt Campbell is the Hottest Coaching Property in this flippin' country...
Jamie has to pay up or lose Matt Campbell imho
Go Cyclones
And honestly i really don't have a problem with the contract Pollard gave Rhoads. In 2011, the market was demanding a pay increase . Pollard got away with offering years instead of annual salary, and ultimately even with the buyout we probably didn't pay him much more than if we'd paid the market price from 2011 on.
The hottest coaching candidate isn’t going to Nebraska. That’s like winning a nice lottery and blowing it all on the Poweball.
I think we pay him to stay, but I certainly don’t see him leaving for any Big 10 team or a has been.
There is not way ISU can't afford a $3.5M-$4/year head coach. Add an additional $2M in the assistant pool. This would be the best investment Pollard has ever made and that includes the south end zone. Facilities are nice, but Pollard's tenure will come down to keeping good coaches and he is 0-2. This can be a chance to change all that.
Other than football and basketball, who cares. Sorry to say but we aren't at the big boy table after the next round of realignment if we have the #1 golf team in the country. Competing for Big 12 titles in football, that's another story.We can afford it, it just means that the other sports will suffer more like they used to before these huge TV contracts. Were getting $10s of millions from the Big 12, we can pay Campbell whatever we want practically, it just means tennis and golf and swimming, and the others will suffer. Its sad, but thats the reality if you want to keep coaches these days.
Will that money get them something better than Mike Reilly this time?Nebraska has the money to buy any coach they want in this country......Whomever the new AD wants he will get with an unlimited amount of money thrown at the coach......
"I would never coach at Nebraska because you have to win every game".....quoting Jimmy Dean Walden
Go Cyclones
Will that money get them something better than Mike Reilly this time?
We can afford it, it just means that the other sports will suffer more like they used to before these huge TV contracts. Were getting $10s of millions from the Big 12, we can pay Campbell whatever we want practically, it just means tennis and golf and swimming, and the others will suffer. Its sad, but thats the reality if you want to keep coaches these days.