Campbell on ‘22 Spring FB

I really don't understand what they expect Campbell to say. Yes, the coach speak does get old, but at this point he is trying to replace 16-18 starters from last year. He talked about some of the changes and some guys that he was happy about. Spring and Fall practices are when he is going to figure out who is going to be able to play when the lights come on.

As far as I am concerned, as long as he keeps figuring out a way to win games, I am not going to worry about him not divulging every detail about the team, injuries, etc.
 
Why? Campbell isn't going to say anything of substance about it.

I really don't know why we even have press conferences with Campbell any more. He doesn't like them, and intentionally says nothing. That's not going to suddenly change.
Have the cojones to ask the questions...
We had a pretty decently sized fanbase before CMC got here as well. Pre Pollard days are another story.

Who can forget the glorious days of Crutchfield left, Crutchfield right, Crutchfield up the middle, Punt.
I remember!
 
Campbell isn't one to make excuses, but he and Meyer's both said preseason the OL was 11 deep. I think that's the number that got thrown around quite a bit.

So one of these can't really be true. Either we weren't legitimately 11 deep, the 11 weren't as good as they thought, or we were REALLY banged up. If we had more than 6 legitimate chronic injuries on the OL... that's concerning.

Yeah, but it made DarkStar FEEL better, and that's what it's about.
 
Love Campbell but don't ever listen to him talk in those types of settings. He never says too much. Which is fine but I don't find it worth it (which is also fine). So I don't listen. Easy.
 
Coaches must think moving Johnson to safety will shore up those inexplicable long 3rd down completions. But that leaves a gaping hole at corner.
I don't think he's still here if he's at corner.
 
Love Campbell but don't ever listen to him talk in those types of settings. He never says too much. Which is fine but I don't find it worth it (which is also fine). So I don't listen. Easy.

Agreed. And further, my preference would be that he not say much at all. We’ve all heard his philosophy and it seems to be a good one. No need to say more than necessary when it’s just filler.
 
It’s weird to me that so many of you folks think CMC didn’t say anything in that video. I think it’s far more likely that you don’t know how to listen.

He’s not going to break down player by player strengths and weaknesses in a presser with a bunch of reporters. Especially two days into Spring drills. I’m really not sure what you’re expecting.

And no, I’m not going to repeat it for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: superiorcyclone
I'm excited to see what Miller and Remsburg can do at tackle. I personally don't think the interior of our line was as good as it should have been last year. Hoping Downing, Hufford, and Simmons all show great improvement. I think the talent is there, we just need guys to be physical and consistent.
In the back half of 2020 and in the Fiesta Bowl, Remsburg balled at Tackle. Guy can play.

Miller is an unknown somewhat, super highly rated, quick enough feet, and massive frame. So I'm optimistic there.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: bozclone
In the back half of 2020 and in the Fiesta Bowl, Remsburg balled at Tackle. Guy can play.

Miller is an unknown somewhat, super highly rated, quick enough feet, and massive frame. So I'm optimistic there.
After the first quarter Miller was damn good against Clemson. He will be our best OL and is legit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bozclone
Campbell didn't lie when he said we were 11 deep in the OL. It just turns out it was 11 guards and no tackles. :jimlad:
 
Campbell isn't one to make excuses, but he and Meyer's both said preseason the OL was 11 deep. I think that's the number that got thrown around quite a bit.

So one of these can't really be true. Either we weren't legitimately 11 deep, the 11 weren't as good as they thought, or we were REALLY banged up. If we had more than 6 legitimate chronic injuries on the OL... that's concerning.
When I saw that comment last year, my immediate thought was the line wasn't going to be very good. Because if you don't say have a clear top 6 or 7 it usually means that it isn't that good and its just that a lot of guys are average.
 
Campbell isn't one to make excuses, but he and Meyer's both said preseason the OL was 11 deep. I think that's the number that got thrown around quite a bit.

So one of these can't really be true. Either we weren't legitimately 11 deep, the 11 weren't as good as they thought, or we were REALLY banged up. If we had more than 6 legitimate chronic injuries on the OL... that's concerning.
We weren't legitimately 11 deep.
 
Moving the needle for recruiting is nearly impossible, ISU isnt gonna pay under the table, wont out compete for NIL, has horrible weather, does not have an abundance of females, does not have legal drugs, does not have beautiful scenery.......
Don't forget the airport excuse. Gotta have airports.
 
People seem to want to make judging coach interviews a varsity sport. I fail to see where coach interviews impact the scoreboard or the team's record. The interviews don't cost us extra coin. Why do we spend time judging the quality and content?

I can't expect coach interviews to be completely open and honest because I don't think the coach has the responsibility to be a scout for the opposition. I think the interviews are just "snacks" to tide us over until the games are played...unless I've got it wrong and the "game" is judging coach interviews.
 
I agree. Having 2 tackles playing tackle instead of 2 guards will help.

We had 5 interior OL playing the majority of the time last year.

I agree but O-line has been the only position on the field that this staff hasn't been able to develop a legit 2 deep.