Bracketology 2024

Doesn't seem possible Tennessee could climb after their performance in the SEC tourney. If one of yesterday's losers was in contention I'd say Arizona. After that it's obviously UNC, then us and Marquette. Makes me want to puke but Illinois can still improve their line.
Oh I agree but most everyone on here is saying their is a zero percent chance we are being discussed for a 1 seed so it has to be 3 of UNC, Tennessee, Arizona or Marquette. My opinion is we are all taking the bracketologists as gospel that we are barely a 2 seed. If we beat Houston stack our resume with everyone else's and it's simply on par or exceeds everyone else vying for the final 1 seed spot
 
Oh I agree but most everyone on here is saying their is a zero percent chance we are being discussed for a 1 seed so it has to be 3 of UNC, Tennessee, Arizona or Marquette. My opinion is we are all taking the bracketologists as gospel that we are barely a 2 seed. If we beat Houston stack our resume with everyone else's and it's simply on par or exceeds everyone else vying for the final 1 seed spot

Then again, it IS Lunardi insisting we're barely a 2-seed, and Palm continuing to insist we're a 3-seed (AND playing in the East, that useless jackass).

EDIT - never mind, that was yesterday. Palm has us as a 2 in the East now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyclonepride
For those worried about SOS, Kansas State was the #11 overall seed last year even though they were 24 in net. They had a non-con SOS of 310. They were 9-8 in quad 1 and 4-1 in quad 2.

4 seed UCon. Was 7-6 and 6-1 going in with a Net of 8.

4 seed Tennessee was 7-7 and 3-3 with a net of 4.
 
What if, hypothetically, we smoke the top team in the country and beat them by 20+ and almost double them up? Then can we be in the conversation for a 1?

(54-28 at the time of this post)
If UNC loses, yes. And I don't care what the zero percent people on here say, their will be a discussion about it
 
  • Like
Reactions: exCYtable