I once thought that, but for programs that care about their standing in the All-Time Wins, All-Time winning percentage categories, it is a sting. That being said, shouldn't be an issue for TOE. / sarcasmVacating wins is stupid.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I once thought that, but for programs that care about their standing in the All-Time Wins, All-Time winning percentage categories, it is a sting. That being said, shouldn't be an issue for TOE. / sarcasmVacating wins is stupid.
Eff that s***...those mofos had to CHEAT to beat us. bahahahahaNo, vacating only affects Iowa's official record.
It's a pretty meaningless penalty. What you are asking for is a forfeit.
I wish Kirk would have retired, this took him back to second place on Big wins, and he remained first in losses!
Not counting playoffs, it's a 3-way tie with Belichick, Dan Reeves, and Jeff Fisher. With playoffs it's Belichick and Tom Landry. Although Andy Reid is closing in at 4 total losses behind.I curious of who has the most losses in NFL history?
I thought he was a great Iowa QB . . .Let's be honest here guys... Watching Cade try and play QB should be punishment enough
I thought they changed that requirement to get The Pirate in. Or am I just imagining that. I thought it was down to 59.5% for Leach.Kirk needs 60% winning percentage to make the HOF. He had it with the 4 wins. Now he needs to win 9 games this year to get it back.
If my math is correct he needs to go 7-6 or better this season to stay above the new 59.5% level.I thought they changed that requirement to get The Pirate in. Or am I just imagining that. I thought it was down to 59.5% for Leach.
Yeah, it changed...
![]()
NFF adjusts College Hall of Fame coaching eligibility criteria
The National Football Foundation has lowered the eligibility criteria for coaches to be considered for induction into the College Football Hall of Fame beginning in 2027.www.espn.com