ISU has three (Crooks, Brown, Jackson) or four (Hare) returning starters, the pre-season conference player of the year (Crooks) and two players on the pre-season all-conference team, as compiled by the coaches. We replaced Emily Ryan with a highly ranked junior PG from the transfer portal (Jada Williams) along with a Conference Player of the Year Forward (Paulk) who can rebound and defend. Theoretically, ISU is LOADED and should be title favorites by almost any measure.
TCU has NINE new arrivals and one player on the pre-season all conference team (Miles). ISU is preseason ranked #13 by ESPN to TCU's #21. Yet somehow TCU got ten coach votes (Campbell can't vote for himself) as favorites to repeat as title winners.
Only two of sixteen Big XII coaches voted for ISU to finish first, which is STUNNING - given the talented and experienced personnel, this is almost certainly an indictment of our coaching staff - the other coaches obviously don't feel CBF can push the correct buttons over the course of a long season.
To me it was a indication that the other coaches maybe think Campbell is a better coach than Fennelly or Nicki Collen especially since ISU and Baylor are relatively loaded. Both ISU and Baylor have two pre-season first teamers and still only managed two first place votes each. I think the top three players for Baylor and ISU are better than the top three for TCU.
Baylor newcomer Talia Scott averaged 20 pts a game as a freshman in the SEC which addresses a problem they have had of late, scoring. And they also added a possible "sleeper" in North Dakota's Kiera Pemberton if she can make the transition to P5. TCU brought in Miles but the two grad transfers to go with Miles are just "solid" but not eye popping all-stars. The only rationale for giving 10 votes to TCU is Campbell himself and, in my opinion, it's a huge challenge. It's odd because everyone else has TCU ranked below ISU and Baylor.