So.... humor me here, in this hypothetical.
Say Franklin, who had a clause he had to at least attempt to get a new job, to offset his buyout, where any job he takes, PSU would have to pay the difference. Yes I know this didnt happen, and he negotiated a settlement etc.
But hypothetically...
Could he have kept that in his back pocket and went into a new school say VT, and say I will take $1 per year, saving that new school a ton of money that can be used for NIL, facilities etc. Which would then force PSU to pay him his full buyout, for years to come, less the $1, while working at VT. Therefore getting a huge leg up at VT, while still earning a massive paycheck.
I know this probably would never happen, and there is probably language in the contract to prevent this, but just a funny hypothetical that I think would be hilarious, if a coach wanted to be petty and there was no protections in the contract to prevent it.
I believe there was some language such as his new job must pay “market value” or something to deter this situation from happening. But would be quite the hypothetical to allow the new school to use that savings on assistant coaches or NIL
Last edited:
