2022-2023 MBB computer projections thread

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,449
65,689
113
LA LA Land
So with #6 recruiting class, if we have a decent year this season we start all these models easily top 10 next year right?

I get starting low losing a guy who was by far leading rebounder/scorer. The other gains and losses really should be a push.
 

ClonesFTW

Well-Known Member
Nov 13, 2013
5,564
9,823
113
Waukee
A few notables after three games as we head into our first real challenge:

- #1 in the country for turnover % on defense at 35.7%
- #6 in the country in offensive rebound %. Obviously very early but a good sign. I went back through the years we haven't finished top 100 in that stat since 2014!!
- #309 in the country for 3pt shooting, unfortunately not unexpected as it was a preseason question mark of who would/could be the shooter.


1669041486817.png
 

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,879
41,475
113
Waukee
The computers didn't hate but didn't love the performance against UW-Milwaukee. This is still very preliminary, though, and I expect Portland is going to tell us a lot about this team --

1669042985188.png

For what it is worth, I think having Iowa State as a bubble team right now is fair. The defense and rebounding are hopefully legitimate, as is the full-court offense, but they are going to struggle to score in the half-court and Big 12 teams are going to pack it in and force shots over the top of the defense. With the current corps of shooters in the backcourt on the team, many of those shots are going to go awry.
 

Acylum

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2006
14,310
15,005
113
The computers didn't hate but didn't love the performance against UW-Milwaukee. This is still very preliminary, though, and I expect Portland is going to tell us a lot about this team --

View attachment 105778

For what it is worth, I think having Iowa State as a bubble team right now is fair. The defense and rebounding are hopefully legitimate, as is the full-court offense, but they are going to struggle to score in the half-court and Big 12 teams are going to pack it in and force shots over the top of the defense. With the current corps of shooters in the backcourt on the team, many of those shots are going to go awry.
Sign me up for 9-9 in conference right now. That would guarantee everything I need.
 

CoachHines3

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 29, 2019
9,568
19,526
113
One thing I thought was interesting early on so far.. % of points coming off free throws. Obviously still very early but at least were getting to the line.

1669047923772.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: CloniesForLife

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,216
55,113
113
The lineups will be interesting. Like does Ward get more time in hopes of a put back/offensive board?
 

CoachHines3

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 29, 2019
9,568
19,526
113
I think that says otherwise. Only 16% of our pts are coming from the line, and allowing 27% from the line.
Yup- you are right. I misread it!

Hey- at least we aren't fouling and putting teams at the line a ton! haha
 

MeowingCows

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2015
39,884
40,606
113
Iowa
A few notables after three games as we head into our first real challenge:

- #1 in the country for turnover % on defense at 35.7%
- #6 in the country in offensive rebound %. Obviously very early but a good sign. I went back through the years we haven't finished top 100 in that stat since 2014!!
- #309 in the country for 3pt shooting, unfortunately not unexpected as it was a preseason question mark of who would/could be the shooter.


View attachment 105777
Whole lotta green numbers on the chart, that's encouraging. I'd like to see our FT count go up this year, so far we've been hitting them at a higher clip iirc. We didn't hardly shoot any FTs last season at all, which was probably caused mainly by a lack of a major rim-attacker.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CyPunch and Acylum

CloniesForLife

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 22, 2015
15,587
21,009
113
The computers didn't hate but didn't love the performance against UW-Milwaukee. This is still very preliminary, though, and I expect Portland is going to tell us a lot about this team --

View attachment 105778

For what it is worth, I think having Iowa State as a bubble team right now is fair. The defense and rebounding are hopefully legitimate, as is the full-court offense, but they are going to struggle to score in the half-court and Big 12 teams are going to pack it in and force shots over the top of the defense. With the current corps of shooters in the backcourt on the team, many of those shots are going to go awry.
Big12 is going to be tough and the top 3 teams (Baylor, Texas, and Kansas) might sweep us as they look really good. BUT the middle to back end of the conference MIGHT be a little weaker this year so we could get some more wins there. I think the difference between tourney team and not is if Tamin can do something that makes teams have to guard him away from the basket. If Big12 teams can just sag the guy guarding him to the paint it's going to be really tough sledding.
 

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,432
79,523
113
DSM
A few notables after three games as we head into our first real challenge:

- #1 in the country for turnover % on defense at 35.7%
- #6 in the country in offensive rebound %. Obviously very early but a good sign. I went back through the years we haven't finished top 100 in that stat since 2014!!
- #309 in the country for 3pt shooting, unfortunately not unexpected as it was a preseason question mark of who would/could be the shooter.


View attachment 105777

I hope we continue crashing the offensive boards. Gonna need those cheapos to keep the points ticking up on the scoreboard. Ward and Osun done changed the game in that facet.
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,794
62,317
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
The lineups will be interesting. Like does Ward get more time in hopes of a put back/offensive board?
He makes a lot of good things happen while he is out there. Very disruptive, and if he doesn't get the rebound, he's been great at tipping it out. I think he had at least three of those last night.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,571
63,620
113
Not exactly sure.
So with #6 recruiting class, if we have a decent year this season we start all these models easily top 10 next year right?

I get starting low losing a guy who was by far leading rebounder/scorer. The other gains and losses really should be a push.
They use 3 years input. We need next year to bury that 2 win season.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: VeloClone and NWICY

Malty Flannel

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2019
1,122
2,803
113
32
Huxley
The computers didn't hate but didn't love the performance against UW-Milwaukee. This is still very preliminary, though, and I expect Portland is going to tell us a lot about this team --

View attachment 105778

For what it is worth, I think having Iowa State as a bubble team right now is fair. The defense and rebounding are hopefully legitimate, as is the full-court offense, but they are going to struggle to score in the half-court and Big 12 teams are going to pack it in and force shots over the top of the defense. With the current corps of shooters in the backcourt on the team, many of those shots are going to go awry.
Help me understand this system, how can ISU be the #5 team in conference, #30 team in country, but a bubble team?
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron