Extremely likely our NCAA’s first round game will be against one of the following:
View attachment 110367
I believe a 4 seed is far more likely than a 7 seed.
Extremely likely our NCAA’s first round game will be against one of the following:
View attachment 110367
How is WI even in in convo?
They have an unusually high number of quad 1 wins for someone with that bad of a net ranking.
So when people say we have no chance of getting DM, my question is asked again....can only local teams of the state only get seeds of 1-4 there, versus still getting put there as a 5,6,or 7?The only team that can’t be placed in DM is whoever the host is. ISU hosted it the first year so DM could land it. We were ineligible that year, but I thought Drake did after that. Not sure who has it this year.
He's had a monster year.....still wonder what happened there. I mean, he didn't leave cuz Prohm exit, it was like right before the season started after his sit out year.I hope we avoid playing Pitt.
I just know Hinson would go off against us.
Those are usually play in game spots.Extremely likely our NCAA’s first round game will be against one of the following:
View attachment 110367
Anything is possible, but seeds 1-4 get preferential treatment in regards to location. They definitely would not allow us to play in Des Moines as a high seed playing a lower seed. Seeds 5-7 is where things get iffy.So when people say we have no chance of getting DM, my question is asked again....can only local teams of the state only get seeds of 1-4 there, versus still getting put there as a 5,6,or 7?
It used to be that local teams not seeded 1-4 would not be placed close so that the 1-4s would not play a team that is closer than them and have a crowd advantage. Have heard that it is still a thing and have heard that it is followed as much, so basically I don't know.So when people say we have no chance of getting DM, my question is asked again....can only local teams of the state only get seeds of 1-4 there, versus still getting put there as a 5,6,or 7?
And we went from 28 to 19 in the NET.Up to #21 in KenPom after today
Up to #19 BartTorvik
so how big is either of those rankings...used alot by committee or just nice to knows??And we went from 28 to 19 in the NET.
Interestingly, Baylor remained unchanged with their loss at 12.
meaning KenPom or Net etc.so how big is either of those rankings...used alot by committee or just nice to knows??
Just to be clear...then Iowa can't get placed there either, correct?? (would tick me off)Drake is the host and cannot play in DM. KU will get DM for sure, regardless of Big 12 tourney play. We have slim to no chance of getting DM. Only shot is winning Big 12 and that is likely not enough, but might depend on other dominoes. KSU and Marquette are the front runners for the other high DM seed.
Wonder if teams like NC, Iowa, or Nova moved in the Quads and that helped us.And we went from 28 to 19 in the NET.
Interestingly, Baylor remained unchanged with their loss at 12.
Which ones cant shoot the 3 and cant tightly guard the perimeter? Cuz thats who we want lolExtremely likely our NCAA’s first round game will be against one of the following:
View attachment 110367
The committee is given team sheets with rankings from NET, KenPom, Sagarin, Strength of Record, and KPI. Supposedly, NET is given the most weight by most members.so how big is either of those rankings...used alot by committee or just nice to knows??
I would love that draw though.How is WI even in in convo?
From the way it sounds. When they meet, by friday/saturday timeframe, they have the teams seedings basically 95% ironed out. They just wait to see if there are an autos that may slip in and if a team can pop up a notch or two due to conference tourney performance. Sunday is just a little movement and final location placements.The committee is given team sheets with rankings from NET, KenPom, Sagarin, KPI, Strength of Record, and KPI. Supposedly, NET is given the most weight by most members.