Would really like to see ISU incorporate that TE shovel pass into the playbook next year.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lazard was running a skinny post and the DB grabbed his jersey at the shoulder (jersey was pulled down his shoulder pad and the DB was able to pull himself in front of Lazard and get the pick around the 45 yard line.I don't remember that play.
Lazard was running a skinny post and the DB grabbed his jersey at the shoulder (jersey was pulled down his shoulder pad and the DB was able to pull himself in front of Lazard and get the pick around the 45 yard line.
This was happening literally every passing play. Refs decided to call it only once...the most critical play of the game.if they want to call holding on that play then call both obvious ones making it offsetting then.. Wirfs got away with one on the line.
View attachment 81109
On the flip side it was also the most critical play of the game for TB and it would have been bad had they not called it from that standpoint.This was happening literally every passing play. Refs decided to call it only once...the most critical play of the game.
There are two factors. First the ball ended up not even close to catchable. If you want to argue that was because of the penalty fine I think it still was in catchable but that’s reasonable. The other reason is because they had been letting all sorts of just as bad of contact go uncalled. It wasn’t just iffy ones like you said. It was blatant ones.Yeah I'm not sure why people are saying GB got screwed. There were others that could've been called earlier, but they weren't as obvious as the last one. He had hold of his jersey and slowed him down to the point where he couldn't get to the ball.
There was another play where the GB player (maybe Lazard again) was held hard on the release and then had his jersey held just as bad on an incomplete pass. The thing was, there were penalties that would get called routinely (several blatant blocks in the backs that sprung runners for a first is one example) and they weren’t called. Why chose this one instance to make the call/s you hadn’t all game?Ah I remember, yeah that probably should've been called but I don't think it was as blatant or noticeable as the last one.
Lol, ok, Stevie Ray.Just something that doesn't sound like ****. Maybe a good guitar player?
Allen missing some throws that need to be made in a conference championship gameGetting in dangerous area for the Bills right now.
There are two factors. First the ball ended up not even close to catchable. If you want to argue that was because of the penalty fine I think it still was in catchable but that’s reasonable. The other reason is because they had been letting all sorts of just as bad of contact go uncalled. It wasn’t just iffy ones like you said. It was blatant ones.

How come nobody is talking about the obvious hold on Tristan Wirfs on that same play? Brady would have been sacked or maybe had the ball stripped had Wirfs not been holding on for his life trying to block Gary from GB. That was just as obvious as what Kevin King did. See below....
View attachment 81111