1 Quarterback unless!?!?

2clones4cy

Active Member
Dec 2, 2012
171
41
28
39
So after watching this disaster tonight and seeing Park come in for 3 straight possessions and not do a thing granted the line was bad tonight! I think it's time to see 1 quarterback play until he messes up badly! Lanning at least scored points and Park is too inexperienced as well as can't run! This needs to be Lannings team the rest of the season. No reason he should lose his job as Park has not impressed!! Wasting to many possessions switching back and fourth! Thoughts???
 
Lanning had chances to secure this job and he repeatedly proves he can't make plays when it counts.

Park has shown flashes of being solid but I don't think the offense is suited for him right now if we want the QB to be a running threat.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CyBobby
They both have not looked good but can't be doing this 2 series rotation and expect to be competitive, maybe qtrs but not every other.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ECIRT.KCAJ
Lanning has been more effective and it's time to keep him behind center. The series with Park were bad. At least Lanning did a good job moving the ball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Isuhsfbcoach
I'm for sticking with Lanning for a while. Park has potential, but is raw. He is behind from not playing for a while and not getting here until fall camp. Lanning has to quit taking sacks though especially in untimely situations. Throw the ball away or on fourth down just throw it up for grabs. I swear he is worried about his completion percentage.
 
I'm for sticking with Lanning for a while. Park has potential, but is raw. He is behind from not playing for a while and not getting here until fall camp. Lanning has to quit taking sacks though especially in untimely situations. Throw the ball away or on fourth down just throw it up for grabs. I swear he is worried about his completion percentage.

"Quit taking sacks" is the dumbest thing I've heard in reference to this game. Neither guy had a ******* chance tonight. The oline was hardly an obstacle. I would bet we'd have 4 of the worst 6 grades in the conference on our OL tonight.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ECIRT.KCAJ
I'm for sticking with Lanning for a while. Park has potential, but is raw. He is behind from not playing for a while and not getting here until fall camp. Lanning has to quit taking sacks though especially in untimely situations. Throw the ball away or on fourth down just throw it up for grabs. I swear he is worried about his completion percentage.

So Park is raw but he's going to get cooked sitting on the bench? That makes no sense. Park needs reps. Just let go of this season, it's basically a big tryout. The guys that we need to be focused on are Park, Jones and the rest of the Fr./So....Sorry Lazard, sorry Lanning, sorry upper classmen it sucks but they aren't the future and I'm not willing to sacrifice their progress for one or maybe two meaningless W's this season.
 
"Quit taking sacks" is the dumbest thing I've heard in reference to this game. Neither guy had a ******* chance tonight. The oline was hardly an obstacle. I would bet we'd have 4 of the worst 6 grades in the conference on our OL tonight.
While neither had a chance tonight that is a big problem for Lanning. He takes the absolute dumbest sacks.
 
It seems like Lanning is the more stable guy that is better at just moving the sticks and Park has more upside for big play ability, but also more chances for negative plays or turnovers as well.

I think I'd like to see Lanning play about 75% of the snaps right now, but that's just my dumb opinion on the matter.

I know the last play of the game for us last night was completely meaningless, but it really bothers me how many games have ended now with Lanning taking sacks. I can think of 3 games in the last 2 years where our last play of the game was Lanning taking a sack. That just CANNOT ever happen. Get rid of it. Give someone a chance to make a play. Are you just concerned about your own numbers and don't want to have another INT on your stat sheet, or do you want to make a play. That bothers me a bit about Joel I have to admit.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CTTB78
So Park is raw but he's going to get cooked sitting on the bench? That makes no sense. Park needs reps. Just let go of this season, it's basically a big tryout. The guys that we need to be focused on are Park, Jones and the rest of the Fr./So....Sorry Lazard, sorry Lanning, sorry upper classmen it sucks but they aren't the future and I'm not willing to sacrifice their progress for one or maybe two meaningless W's this season.

So we should just bench Lazard and Lanning because they are juniors? Pretty stupid argument to make.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron