2025 Transfer Options

KennyPratt42

The Legend
Jan 13, 2017
1,430
2,604
113
We're a better team next year with Jackson on it. He isn't a make or break piece, particularly if we get Cluff, but he's good depth in the post. In a perfect world, his role is slightly reduced next year to more of a Rob Jones or Chatfield minutes/role.

If we get Cluff and Jackson leaves, we'll probably be bringing in someone of a similar profile to Chatfield.
 

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,658
79,995
113
DSM
We're a better team next year with Jackson on it. He isn't a make or break piece, particularly if we get Cluff, but he's good depth in the post. In a perfect world, his role is slightly reduced next year to more of a Rob Jones or Chatfield minutes/role.

If we get Cluff and Jackson leaves, we'll probably be bringing in someone of a similar profile to Chatfield.

I don’t think he can play that role. He’s not active enough for that role.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kurttr

KennyPratt42

The Legend
Jan 13, 2017
1,430
2,604
113
I don’t think he can play that role. He’s not active enough for that role.
Role as in he'll be the backup center and play around 15 minutes a game. Jackson, Jones, and Chatfield all had their own limitations. You don't want to necessarily rely on any of the three to play starter minutes, but could all be productive as post depth in their own way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Letterkenny

TheDudeAbides

Active Member
Jul 28, 2015
90
140
33
We're a better team next year with Jackson on it. He isn't a make or break piece, particularly if we get Cluff, but he's good depth in the post. In a perfect world, his role is slightly reduced next year to more of a Rob Jones or Chatfield minutes/role.

If we get Cluff and Jackson leaves, we'll probably be bringing in someone of a similar profile to Chatfield.
I agree, it doesn't hurt to have a 6'11" post. If Cluff came in he'd likely be the starter, and Jackson relegated to the Chatfield bruiser role. Question is - would he be willing to do that? With what bigs go for in the portal..I'd doubt it, but that would be best case scenario for the 5 imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ProjectInCYte

Letterkenny

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 26, 2023
1,773
3,605
113
I want Jackson back. 6'11" posts don't grow on trees. I think part of the issue was the other center had nearly identical type of game. Not overly skilled slow-footed 6'11" bruiser.
Jackson rotating with Hasan Ward would have been awesome. Play Ward against stretch 5s and quicker more athletic teams, but have Jackson against bigger guys. I also loved Jackson's free throw shooting after feeling like Jones/Ward getting fouled was basically a turnover the last two years.
 

iseedit

Active Member
Nov 17, 2024
109
175
43
I guess I don't really get all the desire for Rohde. If Heise wasn't coming back, then sure, but they are similar enough players that I don't think it makes sense to have both. It was pretty evident towards the end of the year, that we need to get more athletic in a few areas. One being on the wing. Don't get me wrong, he seems like a good player, and has a good 3pt%, but it isn't like he's some volume shooter that's going to fill it up. After losing the scoring of Jones & Gilbert -- that's exactly what they'll need.

Now if they decide to go after Rohde AND a scoring guard/wing then sure, I just don't know if we have the funds for that.

Second order of business has to be a more athletic 5. Jackson is a large human, but is not quick or athletic enough to be that true rim protector. He was really exposed this year in matchups against smaller more athletic bigs. His hands of stone on the offensive end didn't help either. Pair him with an above the rim guy(doesn't even have to be as big, 6'9" is plenty), and I think they'd have a good duo. Ward was missed more than I expected.
If Rohde would be a better option than Nojus then I think you have your answer. He went on a few games stretch with something like 42 assists with only 3 turnovers. I think he also had leadership qualities that our team appears to lack a little.
 

SoleCyclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2022
933
1,813
93
If Rohde would be a better option than Nojus then I think you have your answer. He went on a few games stretch with something like 42 assists with only 3 turnovers. I think he also had leadership qualities that our team appears to lack a little.
He has a very similar game to C. Jones with 2 extra inches. Usage at Virginia is low because their pace of play
 

TheDudeAbides

Active Member
Jul 28, 2015
90
140
33
If Rohde would be a better option than Nojus then I think you have your answer. He went on a few games stretch with something like 42 assists with only 3 turnovers. I think he also had leadership qualities that our team appears to lack a little.
I agree he'd be a good player - just don't think we need to add that mold of player to next year's roster.

If we need to replace scoring in a hurry, we need to look at it as find a better option for Gilbert, not Nojus. I don't think Rohde would come here to be the 7th or 8th guy. Like I said, him and Heise just seem too similar to make sense on next year's squad. Any other year, grab him.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Die4Cy

KennyPratt42

The Legend
Jan 13, 2017
1,430
2,604
113
I can safely say I didn't watch any Virginia basketball this year. Was Rodhe one of their primary ball handlers and initiated their offense some of the time (particularly in the second half of the conference season)? His assist numbers would lead me to believe that is the case. From the start of February on he averaged 5.5 assists per game with a 3.4:1 assist to turnover ratio.

We seem to be at our best when Tamin is playing off the ball, so Rodhe would make some sense from that perspective.
 

SoleCyclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2022
933
1,813
93
I can safely say I didn't watch any Virginia basketball this year. Was Rodhe one of their primary ball handlers and initiated their offense some of the time (particularly in the second half of the conference season)? His assist numbers would lead me to believe that is the case. From the start of February on he averaged 5.5 assists per game with a 3.4:1 assist to turnover ratio.

We seem to be at our best when Tamin is playing off the ball, so Rodhe would make some sense from that perspective.
Yes, he does facilitate the offense. In addition he is one of the highest rated spot up shooters off the pass. So also would benefit from kickouts from post players and Lipsey drives
 

cyclonehomer

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 2, 2019
3,496
5,677
113
30
I can safely say I didn't watch any Virginia basketball this year. Was Rodhe one of their primary ball handlers and initiated their offense some of the time (particularly in the second half of the conference season)? His assist numbers would lead me to believe that is the case. From the start of February on he averaged 5.5 assists per game with a 3.4:1 assist to turnover ratio.

We seem to be at our best when Tamin is playing off the ball, so Rodhe would make some sense from that perspective.
He sort of became much more of a PG halfway through the year I believe and really had some great stretches of play regarding getting assists and also not turning it over. He's also a very good catch and shoot guy, so he can slide around between the 1-3 or whatever and I think that is valuable.
 

SoleCyclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2022
933
1,813
93
I agree he'd be a good player - just don't think we need to add that mold of player to next year's roster.

If we need to replace scoring in a hurry, we need to look at it as find a better option for Gilbert, not Nojus. I don't think Rohde would come here to be the 7th or 8th guy. Like I said, him and Heise just seem too similar to make sense on next year's squad. Any other year, grab him.
IMO. If Rohde is an addition, he would start and Heise moves to 6 man. Which would be great
 
  • Agree
Reactions: MTCyclone43

Frak

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2009
11,439
7,034
113
If someone gives him a ton of money then I think you have to let him walk. He’s the softest 7 footer I have ever seen

I agree with letting him walk if that's the case. He's a good player and had a good year. I hope he stays, but we're not giving him 7 figures. Jackson and Chatfield are big strong kids and can bully smaller teams, but they are a little slow on the perimeter. Most of our losses have the opposing big going off from 3. They couldn't stay in front of guys when they were setting the ball screen and ended up with open looks. WV, OSU, OM were all like that.

What I'd like to see is a 5 that can switch defensively, be a rim protector and lob threat. A Hason Ward. If he can hit an open 3 all the better. Don't really care about the post up game...Jefferson can do that.
 

Texbudman

Well-Known Member
Nov 20, 2012
738
1,293
93
Arlington,Tx
How much cap space do we need to improve?


-someone like Rohde would help a lot. He would add value at three positions. Can we get him at $500k to 750k?


-A player with the potential to be a top end scorer at the 2/3 is needed for the team to have a high ceiling. Best if the player isn’t a liability on defense. That’s $1+ million


-An athletic 3/4 garbage guy that plays defense and rebounds out of his area. I’d love for a Hogue type that can also knock down 3P. But even a Banks type at Drake would help. $250k to $500k?

-A Ward or Bob Jones type at center. $250k to $500k?

That’s around $2.5 on the higher side. Maybe the market is already past that.

Can we keep most of the core 5 for $2.5 million? We’ll need something for the freshman too
Where is this price list on players you're referring to? I would like to look that over. Is there a discount page too?
 
  • Funny
Reactions: NENick

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron