Where was the category that said if CMC stayed 10 years, we wouldn’t win a natty?
Frankly, if he stays twenty more, we might win two or three.
Would you rather:
- Thread starter amishclone
- Start date
Frankly, if he stays twenty more, we might win two or three.
Is this like the old "they shouldn't hit a grand slam here, that would kill their momentum" argument? How is this even a question.
See the above quote. That's what I'm responding to and therefore not making up my own agenda.
25 if you ******* voted against a Natty this year. Name yourselves!
Nowhere in the OP's statement does it state that we would suck post MC...many here seem to be assuming so. I very much doubt that would be the case, we might go back to average but if you've been a Cyclone fan long enough you'd be totally good with that.
Never let fear get in the way of feeling joy.
^^^^ this for real.
Take your favorite example of absolute dispare. Frodo taking the ring through Mordor, USA vs Russia in Hockey, David vs Goliath, etc etc. That's what it was like with no hope of getting better. For years and years. No light at the end of the tunnel. Until Danny Mac came along. It's taken 30 years of building brick by brick to get to where we are today. Still talking of a Natty is silly. We're so far from the hopeless days, but still far from that. Let's keep building brick by brick and doing things the right way.
Nope.
Fast track it to Nattyville. Make it as illegal as possible. Don't care; I'll still watch the game on YT even after all the wins are erased.
/s
Just because Campbell would leave would not automatically mean we go back to the basement, especially in the new Big 12. You absolutely go with the championship given how unlikely it is to happen. Think of some of the coaches that never won one: Bo Schembechler, Bill Snyder, Frank Beamer, Gary Patterson, Chris Petersen. That goes to show you how hard it is to win one, especially when you're not at a blue blood program (a bit mind boggling Bo never won one at Michigan)
Sure, we all would. But at what cost? If our coaches do it, terrific!
If it requires a buy-in such as at Georgia, Alabama - name the blue blood where wealthy elites control the machine - nope. Values matter.
So, what values? A natty at any cost? My values differ from that. If yours don't, I'm not saying you are wrong, just different.
Nothing is forever. The Ice Age will reappear in 10k years. Eons from now, the sun will burn out. Earth will disappear.
Just sayin'
I don’t understand what any of this means. What buy-in requires losing values? Also what does values have to do with winning a natty?
