WVU Eliminating Degree Programs-Future of Higher Ed

Colleges Spend Like There’s No Tomorrow. ‘These Places Are Just Devouring Money.’

Sorry if it's behind a paywall, but this WSJ article last week does a good job covering the updated numbers that some of you were looking for earlier in the thread.

Drops in state funding definitely play a part in these issues, but seems to be an excuse for over the top increases in tuition and overspending in areas that aren't needed for a lot of schools.
Could be a symptom of trying to out-compete each other for students. Basically they are big business now, because of decisions by the govt.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: tigershoops31
The students who borrow hundreds of thousands of dollars to major in art philosophy? Yeah they are morons.

This concept goes for every degree.

If someone goes for something more 'intentional' like business or education, that doesn't mean that's where they end up for all sorts of reasons.
 
Sure it is, that's what I said. But you can't blame the full rise of tuition solely on that.

From the article:
"Public university leaders often blame stingier state funding for the need to raise tuition revenue. And three-fourths of states did cut their support, undermining a longstanding principle that schools educated the populace with government backing. But universities generally didn’t tighten their belts as a result. Rather, they raised prices far beyond what was needed to fill the hole.

For every $1 lost in state support at those universities over the two decades, the median school increased tuition and fee revenue by nearly $2.40, more than covering the cuts, the Journal found."
Don't take the WSJ, but does it separate out fees from tuition? Think fees are often voted on by student body (Quality of Student Life), tuition increases are the result of academic operating expenses. And where does room and board fall into their analysis.
 
Students at WVU can get a quality education. WVU has more Rhodes scholars than Pitt, a much higher ranked school.

What kills WVU in the rankings is it is a state school, and it is mandated to take any and all state students who graduate high school. they get a promise scholarship and head off to WVU to party their asses off until Xmas, when a third of them flunk out.

With the mandate to take students who have no academic aspirations plus a free 1st semester on the taxpayers, it is an animal house situation for a ton of freshmen. They dont care if they flunk out after one semester, they view it as an extended high school graduation party before they roof houses or mine coal for the rest of their lives.
This is a real thing in WVU?!?!?!? o_O That sounds like the most disastrous policy ever!
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlySpartan
WVU is 32 in Rhodes Scholars. Only Kansas among the new big 12 has more. WVU isnt Harvard, but it has good academic programs.

 
WVU is 32 in Rhodes Scholars. Only Kansas among the new big 12 has more. WVU isnt Harvard, but it has good academic programs.


My best colleague, and our department's most successful grad, is a West Virginia guy.
It's fun to make fun of the state, but goodness, we're Iowa. We can't look down on anyone anymore.
 
First doc that popped up for me.


The two worst time periods for appropriations came in the 2001-2005 and 2009-2012 spans. Over those spans, appropriations went down 100 MM and then 150MM respectively.

2001 ISU had roughly 27,900 students with 328MM total budget with a 115.0/199.5MM split tuition to appropriations

2012 it was 31040 students with 574.5MM budget with 317.6/221.8 split

2022 it was 29,969 students with a 748.1 MM budget with 476.5/231.5 split.

It was hard to get numbers far back, why I have 2001 since I couldn't find 2002 readily. The other thing I could not find was staff numbers. I do not know how staff for each of those years compares. I don't remember 2001 and 2002 really well for state funding personally but from what I read, those years were extreme cut years. Total per student budget increased 109% over that period. Inflation during that period was 65%. So ISU's per student budget increased 44% more than inflation.

One other thing that I remember is that the U was subsidizing the AD, believe around 4MM per year. Those funds would be in the 2001 numbers but not in the last set of numbers since the AD now receives no direct funds.

Editted: budget percentages were based on per student and not total.
 
Last edited:
First doc that popped up for me.


The two worst time periods for appropriations came in the 2001-2005 and 2009-2012 spans. Over those spans, appropriations went down 100 MM and then 150MM respectively.

2001 ISU had roughly 27,900 students with 328MM total budget with a 115.0/199.5MM split tuition to appropriations

2012 it was 31040 students with 574.5MM budget with 317.6/221.8 split

2022 it was 29,969 students with a 748.1 MM budget with 476.5/231.5 split.

It was hard to get numbers far back, why I have 2001 since I couldn't find 2002 readily. The other thing I could not find was staff numbers. I do not know how staff for each of those years compares. I don't remember 2001 and 2002 really well for state funding personally but from what I read, those years were extreme cut years. Total budget increased 109% over that period. Inflation during that period was 65%. So ISU's budget increased 44% more than inflation.

One other thing that I remember is that the U was subsidizing the AD, believe around 4MM per year. Those funds would be in the 2001 numbers but not in the last set of numbers since the AD now receives no direct funds.

The AD receives the same amount of funds. It was just passed directly to students.
 
Students at WVU can get a quality education. WVU has more Rhodes scholars than Pitt, a much higher ranked school.

What kills WVU in the rankings is it is a state school, and it is mandated to take any and all state students who graduate high school. they get a promise scholarship and head off to WVU to party their asses off until Xmas, when a third of them flunk out.

With the mandate to take students who have no academic aspirations plus a free 1st semester on the taxpayers, it is an animal house situation for a ton of freshmen. They dont care if they flunk out after one semester, they view it as an extended high school graduation party before they roof houses or mine coal for the rest of their lives.
They have to take everyone that graduates HS!?? I legit had no idea that is a thing. That is absolutely wild. Wonder how many kids end up there that have no business being there like what you’re talking about.
 
No. I was comparing the upgrade in technology to large equipment in 1983 compared to 2023. I am therefore under the assumption that the tools of the trade for plumbers and electricians have also evolved and advanced the same over the last 40 years making it not so taxing on the human body. I am also under the assumption the same progress will continue to be made over the next 40 years as well.

That is my point in all this. These types of jobs are becoming more and more lucrative both physically and fiscally and kids don't need a 4 year degree to obtain it. If colleges and universities continue to jack tuition up more and more students will realize that Trades are a very beneficial and viable option.
LOL!!!!!
 
WVU is 32 in Rhodes Scholars. Only Kansas among the new big 12 has more. WVU isnt Harvard, but it has good academic programs.

That doesn’t mean anything, Montana has the same number as Michigan and more then Vanderbilt and no one is putting montana in the same realm as those schools.

I’m sure WVU has a couple good programs, anyone can get a good education at any major university if they apply themselves. But sadly we live in a world where that alum from WVU (if they aren’t in one of those fields) is going to face a major bias and reduced opportunity then a similar candidate from higher ranked school with a better reputation. Just by that standing it makes WVU a worse investment then ISU, unless you’re in one of those specific programs.
 
They have to take everyone that graduates HS!?? I legit had no idea that is a thing. That is absolutely wild. Wonder how many kids end up there that have no business being there like what you’re talking about.
That’s always been the knock on Boise State
 
  • Informative
Reactions: FriendlySpartan
I, like many iowans, am enjoying the hell out of paying less state tax.
lower taxes isnt always good. I live in Louisiana and politicians here have lowered taxes to the point we have terrible roads, bridges in disrepair, poor utility service, and poor schools.

No one likes waste, but part of being a part of civilized society is paying for the general welfare, especially for children and education.
 
And building fancy 4 room two bath apartments for freshmen to live in instead of the old prison cell dorm rooms. :rolleyes:
Here's the catch though. If a University doesn't do that the students won't go. On one hand you have families complaining about the costs of education, but at the same time will complain if facilities aren't up to their standards.
 
Yes it is. I literally know a person who paid tuition for four or five years at Grinnell College and works the desk in a public library. She's 46. She had some quirky major that has nothing to do with scanning books, but she loves being a librarian. No idea what her debt load was/is. I just know she was paying her loans off for a very long time. I have no idea if art philosophy is an actual major by the way. I just made that up.
There are a ton of college grads doing such things. Is that a failure of the college? Is that the alums issue? Choices are to be made and the person in your example made a choice and it doesn't mean mistakes were made.