Not seeing how Okie St would make a move that could weaken their recruiting in Texas.
The article reinforces my thoughts: It takes time for the Pac to realize what the Big12 already knows, they aren't getting more elsewhere. Unless they decide to stick together because it isn't about money to them, I fully believe the corner schools will eventually move over to the good guys. Sounds like the Big12 is running numbers to show them why we're the better choice... we have years of experience doing that!Thamel usually has good B12 connections
But maybe it was Bob
I’ve read the targets would be KU, Ok St, TCU, Houston, so It wouldn’t hurt it that much.. But there are some top schools that want the sec. that’s not changing, and would be a risk for those that left.Not seeing how Okie St would make a move that could weaken their recruiting in Texas.
The article reinforces my thoughts: It takes time for the Pac to realize what the Big12 already knows, they aren't getting more elsewhere. Unless they decide to stick together because it isn't about money to them, I fully believe the corner schools will eventually move over to the good guys. Sounds like the Big12 is running numbers to show them why we're the better choice... we have years of experience doing that!
It's been reported that the P12 Network is a money loser and that ESPN loses money on the ACC Network. Now the B10 has taken away their biggest market between the two networks. How in the world could a merger of the two networks be successful unless ESPN wants to throw them a lifeline and is willing to lose money in the process. There can't be that many synergies in terms of overhead costs getting reduced. You would still have 100% of the TV production costs. And the teams themselves would incur a huge increase in travel costs.Highlights from the Thamel piece:
The Pac-12/ACC "loose partnership" is expected to get revenue projections from ESPN early next week. People don't think it will be much of a bump because ESPN would not be able to charge the higher in-market rates for ACC Network in Pac-12 markets, since it's not a full merger.
The Pac-12 has convinced the corner schools to wait and see on those numbers before doing anything. If they are unimpressive, they could heat up with the Big 12. Thamel said the conversations between those schools and the Big 12 weren't as hot as had been reported.
Thamel also floats the ACC going on offense to poach schools from the Pac-12 and Big 12 (he mentions TCU and Oklahoma State). Feels unlikely to me but if the ACC keeps its top brands that would be the most $$$ place to be. Nobody knows anything.
Just hope the Pac-12/ACC $$$ figure is bad and then the corner schools might be ready to make a deal for real next week.
makes senseHighlights from the Thamel piece:
The Pac-12/ACC "loose partnership" is expected to get revenue projections from ESPN early next week. People don't think it will be much of a bump because ESPN would not be able to charge the higher in-market rates for ACC Network in Pac-12 markets, since it's not a full merger.
The Pac-12 has convinced the corner schools to wait and see on those numbers before doing anything. If they are unimpressive, they could heat up with the Big 12. Thamel said the conversations between those schools and the Big 12 weren't as hot as had been reported.
Thamel also floats the ACC going on offense to poach schools from the Pac-12 and Big 12 (he mentions TCU and Oklahoma State). Feels unlikely to me but if the ACC keeps its top brands that would be the most $$$ place to be. Nobody knows anything.
Just hope the Pac-12/ACC $$$ figure is bad and then the corner schools might be ready to make a deal for real next week.
Good piece from a legitimate reporter about evaluating the quality of information circulating in chaotic times like these. Lots of people love to talk to reporters (or randos on Twitter), but very few who actually know what's going on.
![]()
How to evaluate a conference realignment rumor:
Not all reports are created equallywww.extrapointsmb.com
You mean a guy who is trying to protect his paycheck.
Brown works hard but his frequent crying about this is old. We wouldn’t pay close attention and he wouldn’t have a job if we just wanted to read what 100% would occur. We’d just read about it after the fact.
Remember that USC rumor?
It all depends on what you’re shopping for as a reader. A lot of stuff that is happening but can’t be “reported” is what people want, especially those that follow this closely. You’re going to need to go to the smut aisle for that
A poor analogy is going exclusively investment grade isn’t what everyone wants, and is passing up return. Some are all about the junk bonds.
You want to mainline the National Enquirer all day, by all means be my guest. Some of us want a realistic take on the situation rather than whatever some idiot tweets out hoping to drive up his follower count.
You are in the wrong thread if you want to take that approach.
All these tweets, rumors, etc. and yet, nothing concrete has really been reported that I've seen.
Just maybe it will be the CF premium deal where we'll just find out eventually.
There’s a difference between shooting the **** over what Max Olsen or Pete Thamel wrote in their articles vs sharing MHVer tweets
IMO…6 in one, half a dozen in the other probably. I’d prefer Utah/CU though, personally. Easier to get to those away games for me.Just curious, if we get the Arizonas. How would getting both Washingtons compare to Utah and Colorado?