I think offsides should definitely have been called.... but how in the world do you not snap that ball?? You have to know the rules better than that..... just snap the damn ball!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think you might have actually been hearing me in the stands, not Campbell. That sounds very similar to the things I was screaming.Right. Now does anyone have the audio during the commercial with hot mic and him mf’ing the hell out of that ref?
I mean.....I’m usually watching the game, not standing there with my phone camera trying to pirate record it all.I can't believe no Iowa State fan in that stadium has video of it.
Did you not watch the alamo bowl?I'm cool with Campbell going nuts. But I think you are interpreting his intentions a bit more the way you want it to be.
I don't think there was any method behind it. He was pissed and he got mad. He doesn't do that and I think he doesn't want to do that. We've seen him lose his **** one other time (against Kansas State in 2017). I bet it will be another 4 years before we see it again.
Yes. I was shocked that both Purdy and Campbell carried on the rant. I know they know these basic rules. I was quite surprised Campbell did not get a technical. (I know most will disagree here, but) I actually thought he was threatening the official the way he kept repeatedly pointing at him. Seemed totally out of character for Campbell.Exactly. All we had to do was 1) snap the ball or 2) jump. Those two things would lead to an offsides penalty. Also, we easily picked up the first down after it so I’m not sure why people are so focused on this...
I mean.....I’m usually watching the game, not standing there with my phone camera trying to pirate record it all.
Sorry, I was too busy scaring the OU teen girls below us with my screaming and cussing at that time.Well, I wouldn't do it either for the same reason. But the number of videos that people tend to make at these things makes it seem odd that no one had video. It was also during a timeout.
Sorry, I was too busy scaring the OU teen girls below us with my screaming and cussing at that time.
I’m actually usually super calm during games, but between the Young ejection, that and later the no call on Purdy getting shoved after he was out of bounds, I was pretty hot.You and I should really be at a game together...
Thought the face mask on Purdy was flagrant. Much greater chance of injury than the Young targeting call.I’m actually usually super calm during games, but between the Young ejection, that and later the no call on Purdy getting shoved after he was out of bounds, I was pretty hot.
by the definition it was targeting. Doesn’t make it a good rule, but it is the
It is a matter of opinion. Forcible is the subjective part. On replay, my definition of forcible would be pretty strong. His head did not snap, his body did not snap, it was not "Forcible" on the Forcible Richter scale. It was a 5 of 10. Needs to be a 9 out of 10 or more.defensless receiver comes into play of targeting.
note 1 point 3. Note 2 point 2.
by the definition it was targeting. Doesn’t make it a good rule, but it is the way it’s written.
View attachment 79678
Looks like our left guard moved with Purdy. Oh well, maybe our linemen will learn a lesson from this.
Campbell got away with his outburst on the offsides no-call for one reason - he was right and the most of the rest of the crew knew it when he was pointing at the line judge and yelling "do your job". Coaches can push it to the limit in these situations compared to when a coach tells an official that either he or his call sucks.
It took the line judge almost the entire game to finally stop ignoring that OU's DE lined up in the neutral zone on multiple snaps without drawing a flag.
It is a matter of opinion. Forcible is the subjective part. On replay, my definition of forcible would be pretty strong. His head did not snap, his body did not snap, it was not "Forcible" on the Forcible Richter scale. It was a 5 of 10. Needs to be a 9 out of 10 or more.
I think you can easily say it wasn’t targeting by the letter of the rule and still understand they were going to call it that way. It’s just a common misapplication of the rule. The forcible contact was to the lower body but the offensive player initiated the head contact.Literally anyone who watches college football can say this play was targeting by the way the rule is written. If you think it wasn’t take off your cardinal and gold tinted glasses. Isheem didn’t get screwed by the refs, he got screwed by the rule.
and yes, this kids head did have that forcible snap motion.
defensless receiver comes into play of targeting.
note 1 point 3. Note 2 point 2.
by the definition it was targeting. Doesn’t make it a good rule, but it is the way it’s written.
View attachment 79678