I didn’t see that, if true then it was a giant missed flag.I would actually say Kolar, though in the backfield, false started by jumping while the defender was in the neutral zone.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didn’t see that, if true then it was a giant missed flag.I would actually say Kolar, though in the backfield, false started by jumping while the defender was in the neutral zone.
Guys, both that call and the offensesides were correct. This isn’t HS, the player has to be across during the snap, make contact, or cause a lineman to move. The lineman across from the second one should have slapped him on the head and gotten the call.
He jumps and points from the other side of the formation. That should be a flag. Pointing is fine...the linemen do it all the time...jumping out of a set stance should have fulfilled a false start with the opponent in the neutral zone.I didn’t see that, if true then it was a giant missed flag.
May have to go and check it out. I believe you, but just curious myself since I didn’t look there. That should have been flagged then.He jumps and points from the other side of the formation. That should be a flag. Pointing is fine...the linemen do it all the time...jumping out of a set stance should have fulfilled a false start with the opponent in the neutral zone.
May have to go and check it out. I believe you, but just curious myself since I didn’t look there. That should have been flagged then.
Writing the words "forcible contact" into the rule really doesn't make much sense to me.Id like a better definition of "forcible contact" for tackles that were clearly not that because the defenseless player dropped into contact at the head or neck area- the defensive player was clearly not initiating it.
The target call was debatable, and the offsides call is made in many games I've watched. Even if CMC thought the calls met the strict interpretation of the rule, I thought he was letting the refs know--"Don't call this game in Oklahoma's favor because they are just playing little 'ole Iowa State.'. Good coaches work the officials and make sure things are not going to go one sided. It was a big game obviously, and CMC was not going to tolerate it. Johnny Orr was the master at this.
Right. Now does anyone have the audio during the commercial with hot mic and him mf’ing the hell out of that ref?
Was this the hot mike clip?
That’s what I’m sayin!!!I can't believe no Iowa State fan in that stadium has video of it.
Correct, which is why the rule is dumb as ****. Stoops just went down, no fault of his, but Young is going into what would’ve been a good tackle had he not.Id like a better definition of "forcible contact" for tackles that were clearly not that because the defenseless player dropped into contact at the head or neck area- the defensive player was clearly not initiating it.
I'm cool with Campbell going nuts. But I think you are interpreting his intentions a bit more the way you want it to be.
I don't think there was any method behind it.....
Or rip the helmet off altogether...I think Sean McDonough said it best on the broadcast - that is was definitely targeting by definition of the rule. And that the rule needs changed.
I get what they are doing but to kick someone out for a bang-bang non-malicious hit while letting someone rip Purdy’s face mask off his helmet is BS “player safety”.