***Official Insider Information Weekly Mailbag 01-29-2020***

Thoughts on This Week's Mailbag


  • Total voters
    15

CloneLawman

Fortis Non Ferox
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 13, 2006
14,501
17,685
113
Wherever I go, there I am.
It might be worth it.

1517164522382.gif
Your gif and my comment both featured fictitious Russian assets!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GTO and jcyclonee

Doc

This is it Morty
Aug 6, 2006
37,437
21,963
113
Denver
Bart Torvik has us #41 in the nation for adjusted offense.

That is not great, but it is not nearly as dire as some make it out to be. We were #75 in adjusted offense in the 2018 season, for comparison.

The problem is our defense is ******* awful.

Our 2018 defense was #111 -- this year is #140 (!!!) bad.

We are missing more shots from three (31.3% this year to 35.8% in the 2018 season, so having Donovan Jackson and Lindell Wigginton around was useful for at least something), but part of that is the line being further out affecting everybody.

We are #323 in the nation defending the three-point line. Teams are shooting 37.1% against us -- I do not know how that is possible, but there it is.

We are also 0-4 in close games, which doesn't help.

Flip Oregon State, FAMU, TCU, and Auburn to our favor, and this is a completely different season. We are probably on the comfortable side of the bubble.

Unless Wigginton is going to D up and stop teams from drilling threes on us (lol) or at least hit some big shots late in close games (not what I remember him for), then I do not know if he is really the one to help with our current woes.

Our offensive ratings get worse pretty much every time we play. It’s a sign the offense isn’t as good as the rating.

We were starting Talley, Solo, and Lard for a few games in 2018 where they actually performed well.

The great thing about sports is that people are adjusting quickly. I love the stat guys like kenpom and bartorvik but these are just tools. The sport still matters.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: jcyclonee

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
25,054
37,177
113
Waukee
Our offensive ratings get worse pretty much Qevery time we play. It’s a sign the offense isn’t as good as the rating.

We were starting Talley, Solo, and Lard for a few games in 2018 where they actually performed well.

The great thing about sports is that people are adjusting quickly. I love the stat guys like kenpom and bartorvik but these are just tools.

Our adjusted offense rating is not trending down over time.

Actually, it is pretty steady if not trending upwards.

upload_2020-1-29_14-6-41.png

We are just playing better defenses in the Big 12.

I would take 2020 Haliburton and 2020 Bolton as the foundation to an offense way before I would take 2018 Talley, Young, and Lard for the same.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Doc

Doc

This is it Morty
Aug 6, 2006
37,437
21,963
113
Denver
Our adjusted offense rating is not trending down over time.

Actually, it is pretty steady if not trending upwards.

View attachment 69929

We are just playing better defenses in the Big 12.

I would take 2020 Haliburton and 2020 Bolton as the foundation to an offense way before I would take 2018 Talley, Young, and Lard for the same.

Well, I stand corrected.
 

jcyclonee

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
22,496
25,079
113
Minneapolis
Our adjusted offense rating is not trending down over time.

Actually, it is pretty steady if not trending upwards.

View attachment 69929

We are just playing better defenses in the Big 12.

I would take 2020 Haliburton and 2020 Bolton as the foundation to an offense way before I would take 2018 Talley, Young, and Lard for the same.
That graph is curvy, like ScarJo, which has me trending upwards.