This is why Prohm must go........

Macloney

Well-Known Member
Feb 28, 2014
5,194
5,668
113
Up Nort
Why does starting/not make such a difference? Minutes are more important. Your five most important players are not always your five starters.

Career ATR for a few notable guys...
---
Morris -- 768/165 = 4.65
Weiler-Babb -- 358/138 = 2.60
Haliburton -- 204/54 = 3.78
Wigginton -- 141/141 = 1.00

One. ONE. ONE!!! Tyrese has more career assists than him by a wide margin after 1.25 seasons. Wigginton almost had as many turnovers as Morris did in four years playing 38+ minutes per night in only two seasons!

Which one(s) should have been running PG again?

Wigginton definitely had a few sets where he initiated the offense, but when you clearly do not have true PG skills, his best role was as a SG/shooter, not a primary ball-handler the team was at its best last year with Nick running the show.

There are things to criticize about Prohm as a coach, but the "he was unfair to Wigginton and should have played him more/played him at PG" one is just bizarre to me. The case is so overwhelming against it that I conclude that you all are either (1.) stupid and know nothing about basketball or (2.) you're grasping for whatever straw you can find, and this just seems like an obvious one yet it falls apart under scrutiny.

Don't let facts get in the way of a good old fashioned Prohm bashing/Fred blowjob fest.

Or as it's otherwise known, Cyclone Fanatic.
 
  • Creative
Reactions: Cyclones423

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,917
41,621
113
Waukee
Don't let facts get in the way of a good old fashioned Prohm bashing/Fred blowjob fest.

Or as it's otherwise known, Cyclone Fanatic.

They are still here psychologically.

ThatRadiantLadybird-size_restricted.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Macloney

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
12,999
20,962
113
You said the expectations going into last year were too low for ISU because people didn't realize how good Jacobson and Shayok were.

They were 8 and 6 ppg guys at their previous stops. Not sure why anyone would've expected Shayok or Jacobson to do what they did last year, because there wasn't really an indication they were those types of players.

People keep saying we shouldn't judge last season vs. preseason expectations because they were too low. Why would the expectations have been higher than a 6 seed? You had two injury prone role players in NWB and Young alongside two talented but wildly inconsistent freshman (LW and Lard) returning from a really bad team. Then you are adding in a freshman ranked about 50-ish in THT (ranked similarly to Matt Thomas, who struggled mightily as a freshman), a role player from a good team (Shayok) and a role player from a bad team (MJ). Then you have two freshmen that are decently ranked in Conditt and Griffin, and one low-ranked Freshman in Haliburton.

My problem is in the same thread we can have people claiming Prohm horribly mismanaged Wigginton, who's probably going to be a G-League/overseas lifer that was an efficient scorer and conf. 6th man of the year as a soph. while giving Prohm no credit for having Shayok go from an 8 ppg role player to an All-American. Or having MJ go from a 6 and 5 kind of role player to a double-digit scorer that was huge in the big 12 tournament.
 

ClonesFTW

Well-Known Member
Nov 13, 2013
5,564
9,823
113
Waukee
We met and exceeded preseason expectations.

They did not know that Wigginton would be hurt much of the season, that Lard would regress on top of being his usual basket case, that Solomon would be out, and none of the other freshmen would be quite ready. I would argue against you on THT, too -- he was great in moments but borderline unplayable in others. He could go out there and make every hunk of junk he put up some nights, but others, he would shoot you out of games.

One year ago your own post said that we were projected to win 11 games in conference, they were surely aware of our injury situation at that time. We did not meet or exceed that expectation.

upload_2019-12-19_12-52-19.png
 
Last edited:

Statefan10

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 20, 2019
21,188
27,212
113
17-18 was the most non-competitive year at Iowa State since Sullivan’s soph year. We weren’t a game or two away. That’s the narrative that keeps getting pushed by the numbers are very clear.

Of the 18 losses 11 of them were by double digits. 9 of them were by 15 points or more. We had two nice Top 25 upsets of Texas Tech and West Virginia. When the average loss in Big 12 play is 12.5 points per game I don’t think we are on the cusp of postseason.
I'm not saying we were a game or two away from the tournament, I'm saying we were a game or two away from the year not being as bad. You can have a year like that every once in a while, especially after losing a ton of contributors from the year prior.. And look, the year after that, we win the Big 12 Tournament and are a 6 seed in the NCAA tournament. Lon Kruger and the Sooners went 11-20 in 2016-2017 and then followed it up with a first round exit the next year.
 

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
12,999
20,962
113
He got hurt in the Iowa game. Alabama is a bottom level SEC squad and comparing Seton Hall without their big to Louisville....you lose me there. Iowa State has yet to have a bad loss which will serve them well. But at the end of the day you have to get to 18-13 to be on the cusp which means they need 10 conference wins. We have the talent to get it done, hopefully they can make the NCAA tournament.

Yep, and Iowa led by double digits while he was playing in a wire-to-wire victory. He played most of the game.

I didn't compare the SH and Louisville win other than to say that ISU had a less impressive best win, but in addition at least had another win against a major conference team. Not that a TTU comparison really matters, but the Lousiville game has been an extreme outlier so far. Doesn't mean TTU won't be good, but they've lost to every other team that has a pulse, and they damn near lost to a horrendous Southern Miss. team.
 

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,917
41,621
113
Waukee
One year ago today your own post said that we were projected to win 11 games in conference, they were surely aware of our injury situation at that time. We did not meet or exceed that expectation.

View attachment 69309

I did not make that thread until after Maui. That was well into the season.

Preseason (according to that one source) --

upload_2019-12-19_14-5-44.png

upload_2019-12-19_14-7-22.png

upload_2019-12-19_14-6-4.png

upload_2019-12-19_14-6-14.png
 

goody2012

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 28, 2014
1,143
1,300
113
Using preseason expectations to determine the success of a coach is really pointless. The coaches' past performance and recruiting set those expectations. Compare the seasons to the programs' history. Fact is, Prohm has underachieved the program. And looks like that is going to continue.
 

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,917
41,621
113
Waukee
Using preseason expectations to determine the success of a coach is really pointless. The coaches' past performance and recruiting set those expectations. Compare the seasons to the programs' history. Fact is, Prohm has underachieved the program. And looks like that is going to continue.

I will take more of this kind of underachievement --

90


Gimme some of that every year.
 

Statefan10

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 20, 2019
21,188
27,212
113
Using preseason expectations to determine the success of a coach is really pointless. The coaches' past performance and recruiting set those expectations. Compare the seasons to the programs' history. Fact is, Prohm has underachieved the program. And looks like that is going to continue.
There is not a fact to back that up whatsoever, considering Prohm has won the same amount of hardware that Fred Hoiberg did when he was at Iowa State. Prohm has kept the program steady at the moment.
 

goody2012

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 28, 2014
1,143
1,300
113
There is not a fact to back that up whatsoever, considering Prohm has won the same amount of hardware that Fred Hoiberg did when he was at Iowa State. Prohm has kept the program steady at the moment.
Who did he add to those rosters? They were Hoiberg's players.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-12-19_13-14-4.png
    upload_2019-12-19_13-14-4.png
    114.8 KB · Views: 4
  • Creative
Reactions: Macloney

goody2012

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 28, 2014
1,143
1,300
113
"What have you done for me lately"? You know the program is in good shape when that is the first thing you think of after bringing down the nets in KC. That or you just enjoy bagging on Prohm.
He won a meaningless tournament and lost in the one that matters immediately after that to a terrible Ohio State team. Seriously, what makes you think the program is in good shape?
 

Statefan10

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 20, 2019
21,188
27,212
113
Who did he add to those rosters? They were Hoiberg's players.
You may not know this, but almost the entire team Prohm's first year had to get re-recruited by Prohm in order stay at Iowa State. Some guys wanted to head to the league, while some wanted to possibly transfer. Prohm got them to stay. Prohm also added Donovon Jackson and Solomon young, who helped immensely during the 2016-2017 season. Also, Deonte and NWB never played a minute under Fred and developed into very nice players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sigmapolis