Here's a thought: instead of giving Randy what he wants and wasting our time on this, let's celebrate the tourney and enjoy our game tonight.
You're hinting to me that breaking his other leg is not an option?
Here's a thought: instead of giving Randy what he wants and wasting our time on this, let's celebrate the tourney and enjoy our game tonight.
The money spent would be very, very small compared to the risk involved.Why spend the money? Otz is the guy, and he'll be good.
You are delusional if you think the next coach isn't TJ.
Hiring Otz after 3 years in the Summit Conference isn’t too different than Prohm and 4 years in the OVC. But to your point, the Prohm hire had the same criticism. It was June, though. Otz does have the advantage of spending many years as a pertinent assistant at ISU, but there’s clearly been value in Prohm making a career out of identifying recruits.Otz is a great recruiter...but Prohm ain’t bad either...I just don’t know if Otz has had enough HC experience to warrant taking over essentially what has been a top 25 ish program the past 7-8 years..
You think LE, Wayne, and even McDermott left completely on their own terms?
I know you have a pathological need to feel abandoned, but in nearly 40 years we’ve only had two coaches leave. Both for the NBA. That’s not bad.
Hiring Otz after 3 years in the Summit Conference isn’t too different than Prohm and 4 years in the OVC. But to your point, the Prohm hire had the same criticism. It was June, though. Otz does have the advantage of spending many years as a pertinent assistant at ISU, but there’s clearly been value in Prohm making a career out of identifying recruits.
Agree, we’d be fine with Otz as a contingency, but we should try to get better. Otz would need a large budget for an great staff.I was going to criticize Otz's lack of HC experience but you make a decent comparison to Prohms hiring. Prohm has been able to recruit some talented guards over the years. I know TJ has a decent class coming into SDSU this year but i wouldn't say he's been killing it recruiting there. Mainly walked into having Mike Daum, and didn't make the tourney this year....
If we were more desperate for a coach, Otz would be a fine choice. But I feel it would be shortsighted with where this program is at to not explore more proven guys. Even Nate Oats?
Agree, we’d be fine with Otz as a contingency, but we should try to get better. Otz would need a large budget for an great staff.
Prohm also walked into a very good situation at Murray, which has been a top program in their conference for a long time. He “inherited” Canaan (he did recruit him) and then added Payne. Prohm only made the tournament once, his first year. I’m not worried about Otz recruiting.
Large budget for a staff, not necessarily large budget overall. Could you go 13-18 for $200k and spending $3 million on proven assistants?I think I would take my chances with a "large budget and great staff" in any sport. I don't even like basketball and I could roll out a moderately successful team with $$ and great coaches
Large budget for a staff, not necessarily large budget overall. Could you go 13-18 for $200k and spending $3 million on proven assistants?
Joking aside, it’s a model not often enough utilized imo. Outside of the slam dunk, hottest candidates, how much risk do you remove by spending $1-$2 million more on the HC? A lot of success of up-and-coming candidates is a product of circumstance. High paid assistants is particularly impactful for basketball in which an assistant that can bring in a great player can significantly change the program. That’s what I thought the Hoiberg hire was until I saw the initial salary. Cheap, but popular HC, with proven, expensive recruiters and/or experienced tacticians.
@cyrocksmypants - Did you know this? I'm counting on you as my source for all things Prohm from now on.
For those saying that Alabama is a step down in Basketball, listen to these stats: