Just want to keep consolidated before we get twenty seven individual thoughts on the main board. Please keep it here.
My hot take is that I think we should have scored more points than Kansas
We are a far less effective defensive team with Wigginton on the floor and when he’s not covering that on the other end it’s a recipe for a loss.
The officiating didn’t suck. So there’s that I guess.
Lewis and Conditt would have been lost out there. Lewis hasn't played defense all year, and Conditt would have been going against the best player in the conference. Talley, I would have tried because of his defense and matchup options.My main question...What is Prohm’s aversion to playing more than 7-8 guys? When you have two guys as volatile as Wiggy and Lard, wouldn’t you want to at least have a couple of guys that could give you 5-10 mins on nights like tonight when those two give you absolutely nothing. You can’t tell me it would honestly hurt you to give Talley, Lewis, or Conditt a few of their minutes?
Obviously when those two are playing well, they should get those minutes. But when one fouls out in 6 minutes and the other can’t hit a shot but insists on forcing the issue and making bad decisions all night, I wonder why he doesn’t budge on this line of thinking.
We had no answer for Lawson. And you can’t give up a 14-0 run at AFH. Glad we battled back, but we were playing catch-up the last 10 minutes
I was very impressed with Haliburton’s poise tonight. Clutch free throws, good 3 point shooting, and good ball distribution as usual. Nothing jumps off the stat page from him, but he was the only one that didn’t seem shook at times, along with NWB. I feel confident with the ball in either of their hands, much like Monte in previous years.