Tech got in last year at 9-9 and played NOBODY in non con. We will be fine.If we get to 9-9 and go one-and-done in the B12 tournament it will be a very stressful Selection Sunday.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tech got in last year at 9-9 and played NOBODY in non con. We will be fine.If we get to 9-9 and go one-and-done in the B12 tournament it will be a very stressful Selection Sunday.
Tech got in last year at 9-9 and played NOBODY in non con. We will be fine.
Tech was 10-1 in non-conference and has wins against us (#4 seed), Baylor on the road (#3 seed) and Oklahoma (#2 seed). We won't have as many quality wins unless we beat either Kansas or WVU on the road.
I understand that but my point is that "good losses" carry a hell of a lot more weight than wins against dog **** teams. It's almost like fans want this team to miss the big dance do they can beat the Prohm sucks drum...Tech was 10-1 in non-conference and has wins against us (#4 seed), Baylor on the road (#3 seed) and Oklahoma (#2 seed). We won't have as many quality wins unless we beat either Kansas or WVU on the road.
Only thing I disagree with is Iowa being top 100, I don't see that happening. Either way, that loss isn't as bad as a lot of people make it out to be. Weird stuff happens in a rivalry game...A good resource: http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/rpi/_/groupId/8/teamId/66
Iowa is our worst loss by far and I expect them to be in the top 100 before year end. I also expect Vandy to be Top 50. That's not too shabby.
We have 2 top-50 wins right now, including a road win at #32 Ok St.
It's going to be ok.
Only thing I disagree with is Iowa being top 100, I don't see that happening. Either way, that loss isn't as bad as a lot of people make it out to be. Weird stuff happens in a rivalry game...
I thibk you have your own definition of quality wins. It's not the definition the committee uses.
I understand that but my point is that "good losses" carry a hell of a lot more weight than wins against dog **** teams. It's almost like fans want this team to miss the big dance do they can beat the Prohm sucks drum...
They didn't have 4 non-conference losses either. 17-14 doesn't get us in. If you can find any time in history that record got an at large spot I would be shocked. That would also mean finishing the year 4-7 which wouldn't impress the committee as well as a super weak nonconference.Tech got in last year at 9-9 and played NOBODY in non con. We will be fine.
It's optimistic to think we beat both WVU and Baylor at home, but if we win all of our remaining home games I think we sneak in.
The entire season's been predictable imo. If you knew back in 2013 that we'd add only Burton would you be high on 2016-17 turning out well? We don't have enough difference makers and/or too many holes to win enough close games. If we make the tournament Prohm will have done a hell of a job.
Michigan State got an at large in 2011 with a 19-14 record (finished regular season 5-8), and their only notable OOC win was against 7 seed Washington.They didn't have 4 non-conference losses either. 17-14 doesn't get us in. If you can find any time in history that record got an at large spot I would be shocked. That would also mean finishing the year 4-7 which wouldn't impress the committee as well as a super weak nonconference.
Michigan State got an at large in 2011 with a 19-14 record (finished regular season 5-8), and their only notable OOC win was against 7 seed Washington.
It was probably a reputation bid, but we've got a bit of a reputation ourselves, fwiw.
Fairly aware that the committee's quality wins definition will include teams outside the Top 20. Do you disagree that if we finish 9-9 our resume will be worse than Texas Tech from a year ago. Just not sure how you think 17-13 gets us in even with a soft bubble. But you are on record that 9-9 will safely get us in.
Bump.
Our resume is dog **** right now. Winning at home vs BU and WVU won't be enough.
Love the assumptions in this thread about winning at Vanderbilt. That was the second most predictable loss of the season besides the Squawk game.