Enjoy! A few hoops thoughts too.
http://cyclonefanatic.com/2016/09/three-thoughts-why-not-target-lazard-more/
http://cyclonefanatic.com/2016/09/three-thoughts-why-not-target-lazard-more/
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How are these two sentences almost back-to-back?
"That is exactly why I feel like Iowa State could end 2016-17 with a better record than last year’s team that went to the Sweet 16. Compared to the last two years, the Big 12 is going to be down."
"Pound for pound, the Cyclones might be better than they were a year ago but their record at the end of the year might not show it."
Not being an ass, but there were three sentences in that take and two of them completely contradict each other?
What bothered me most about it was that in the previous possession a TCU receiver had a much worse push off to catch the ball on third and long.I'm still floored by that offensive PI call. How can you let the defender use his hands all game and specifically on that play as much as he did and then call PI on the receiver when he tries to dislodge the defender's hands to get to the ball?
Big 12 refs
How are these two sentences almost back-to-back?
"That is exactly why I feel like Iowa State could end 2016-17 with a better record than last year’s team that went to the Sweet 16. Compared to the last two years, the Big 12 is going to be down."
"Pound for pound, the Cyclones might be better than they were a year ago but their record at the end of the year might not show it."
Not being an ass, but there were three sentences in that take and two of them completely contradict each other?
Any video out there of the play? I missed the first half and the cyclone express video on cyclones.tv doesn't show it.I'm still floored by that offensive PI call. How can you let the defender use his hands all game and specifically on that play as much as he did and then call PI on the receiver when he tries to dislodge the defender's hands to get to the ball?
Big 12 refs
How are these two sentences almost back-to-back?
"That is exactly why I feel like Iowa State could end 2016-17 with a better record than last year’s team that went to the Sweet 16. Compared to the last two years, the Big 12 is going to be down."
"Pound for pound, the Cyclones might be better than they were a year ago but their record at the end of the year might not show it."
Not being an ass, but there were three sentences in that take and two of them completely contradict each other?
Typo: I left one word (not) out of the last one and it changed everything. How it should have read:
Pound for pound, the Cyclones might not be better than they were a year ago but their record at the end of the year might not show it.
I'm more appalled by the unsportsmanlike conduct on the sideline, but this was pretty bad too.I'm still floored by that offensive PI call. How can you let the defender use his hands all game and specifically on that play as much as he did and then call PI on the receiver when he tries to dislodge the defender's hands to get to the ball?
Big 12 refs
Yeah, when a team has made it clear that they are regularly going to try to snap the ball as fast as humanly possible to try to catch the defense before they are ready, you have to give a defender the right to get back to the LOS quickly even if it means that the disentanglement is not as neat and friendly as one would like.I'm more appalled by the unsportsmanlike conduct on the sideline, but this was pretty bad too.
Typo: I left one word (not) out of the last one and it changed everything. How it should have read:
Pound for pound, the Cyclones might not be better than they were a year ago but their record at the end of the year might not show it.
For a second I thought SolarGarlic had high-jacked your account.You put the not in the wrong location. How you should've wrote it.
the Cyclones might not be better than they were a year ago but their record at the end of the year might show it. NOT!