Random thoughts III

Status
Not open for further replies.
And nickels...I think my last piece of 'new girl' introduction info...any and all flirting by 00clone is intended to be completely harmless, and only intended to give you a little ego boost as you go about your day. We can all use one now and then....well, except pants. With him, sometimes I gotta be the burr in his saddle to make sure he can get thru the door.

:wink:
 
So, CG, 55...what's your thoughts on the whole "dad bod" thing...I mean, just for discussion's sake?

*edit: I should be clear that inputs from the other ladies are welcome as well, it's just that I assume that Rev, Birdy, KC, etc. are natch okay with dad bod, since, well, they're married to dad bods.

I haven't really seen anything about it. What exactly is a 'dad bod'? Besides that fact that the spouse has been working out, so he's like a young dad bod. :cool:
 
I haven't really seen anything about it. What exactly is a 'dad bod'? Besides that fact that the spouse has been working out, so he's like a young dad bod. :cool:


Maybe others have read more, like I said in other posts, I haven't really read that much, but the impression I got was that there was a woman in New York who said something along the lines of that she was either starting to prefer, or was consciously switching to guys who, while not fat...weren't men's fitness magazine models with six pack abs and zero body fat, because guys with a dad bod were a lot more fun and less drama.

So, now that I started the discussion with no real information, I <sigh> actually had to read the fad info. The original article:

http://theodysseyonline.com/clemson/dad-bod/97484

Washington post article:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...have-a-dad-bod-this-flow-chart-will-tell-you/

OK, so in the original article, the first 'why we love dad bod' is that dumb "because it makes me insecure"...then work on that, don't blame another persons' body for you not feeling good about your own (although, representing men, there's plenty that we do to women that the blame isn't primarily on the woman). The second "we want to be the cute one"...how dumb, it kinda relates back to #1....although, I will admit that a man who is prettier than his woman is a problem. Reasons 3 and 4, good points. Reason 5: not necessarily true, although it could be...but it could be that a man that has gotten to be 'overweight but not obese' by the time he's 22 might well keep that upward trajectory until he's 45, then you're married to Jabba the Hut...again, maybe not, I'm within 15 lbs of where I was in college...

And, in the WP article, essentially they're defining it as overweight, but not obese. So, technically, I'm at the very bottom of dad bod, and looking to get out of it in the next few weeks.
 
Maybe others have read more, like I said in other posts, I haven't really read that much, but the impression I got was that there was a woman in New York who said something along the lines of that she was either starting to prefer, or was consciously switching to guys who, while not fat...weren't men's fitness magazine models with six pack abs and zero body fat, because guys with a dad bod were a lot more fun and less drama.

So, now that I started the discussion with no real information, I <sigh> actually had to read the fad info. The original article:

http://theodysseyonline.com/clemson/dad-bod/97484

Washington post article:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...have-a-dad-bod-this-flow-chart-will-tell-you/

OK, so in the original article, the first 'why we love dad bod' is that dumb "because it makes me insecure"...then work on that, don't blame another persons' body for you not feeling good about your own (although, representing men, there's plenty that we do to women that the blame isn't primarily on the woman). The second "we want to be the cute one"...how dumb, it kinda relates back to #1....although, I will admit that a man who is prettier than his woman is a problem. Reasons 3 and 4, good points. Reason 5: not necessarily true, although it could be...but it could be that a man that has gotten to be 'overweight but not obese' by the time he's 22 might well keep that upward trajectory until he's 45, then you're married to Jabba the Hut...again, maybe not, I'm within 15 lbs of where I was in college...

And, in the WP article, essentially they're defining it as overweight, but not obese. So, technically, I'm at the very bottom of dad bod, and looking to get out of it in the next few weeks.

The BMI is overrated to some extent. It doesn't take into account muscle weight. I've pretty much leveled out, I think inbetween eating right (mostly), exercise, and resistance training. I think I am still in the overweight almost obese numbers..... which doesn't make any sense. I'm wearing size 8 jeans.... so I don't think I'm overweight at all.
 
The BMI is overrated to some extent. It doesn't take into account muscle weight. I've pretty much leveled out, I think inbetween eating right (mostly), exercise, and resistance training. I think I am still in the overweight almost obese numbers..... which doesn't make any sense. I'm wearing size 8 jeans.... so I don't think I'm overweight at all.


True...there are so many factors that go into healthy weight that a 2 factor, height/weight chart cannot be anywhere near completely reliable...like you mentioned, muscle being denser than fat...heck, the CDC doesn't even factor in men or women, and women naturally, and for good reason, tend to have a higher body fat % than men (the energy requirements of gestation and lactation).

Although, I will say that since I've done all this BMI research over dad bod...for me, actually for Mrs 00clone, with our frames, the BMI works pretty well. As I mentioned, at 5' 11" and 179, I'm getting into overweight territory by BMI, and I'd say that's right around where I start to think "err...I gotta do something here". For Mrs. 00clone, she's more on the other end, and being a *kind of* gentleman, I won't list her height and weight, but putting in numbers for her, at certain weights she's normal, and below a certain number, she's underweight, and I'd agree with those numbers. But again, yeah, I also know people (especially muscular people) where it's like...nah, man, no way you're overweight.
 
The BMI is overrated to some extent. It doesn't take into account muscle weight. I've pretty much leveled out, I think inbetween eating right (mostly), exercise, and resistance training. I think I am still in the overweight almost obese numbers..... which doesn't make any sense. I'm wearing size 8 jeans.... so I don't think I'm overweight at all.

The origin of RTIII "strong like soccer mom" being the new strong like bull.

Unanticipated issues of using RTIII lingo outside of CF: I used "strong like soccer mom" recently in real life and got the WUT look.
 
The stupid is multiplying. Not only do people have themselves convinced that Fred leaving this spring is a done deal, but they have already decided that they know the TJ is the heir. Not guessing - they know. I'm thinking of going over and asking for some Powerball numbers.

Poll on Fred's replacement - SMH

/end rant
 
The stupid is multiplying. Not only do people have themselves convinced that Fred leaving this spring is a done deal, but they have already decided that they know the TJ is the heir. Not guessing - they know. I'm thinking of going over and asking for some Powerball numbers.

Poll on Fred's replacement - SMH

/end rant

And here I thought Hornacek was already hired...
 
00, you be a manager, correct?

What you think of it?

pants, I know you are but that's different.
 
00, you be a manager, correct?

What you think of it?

pants, I know you are but that's different.


I am not currently a manager, but have been. I enjoy leading, but hate babysitting....hate, hate, hate it. The leadership position I was in within the organization I'm in meant that I was responsible for babysitting if I needed to, but didn't have the authority to quickly eliminate the babysitting problem people.

The biggest thing that changed after being a leader from when I wasn't a leader is that you totally look at things differently, and I can't concisely describe it, either. The biggest caveat I'd give to those considering leadership is to really evaluate why you want to be a leader. There are those who want to be a leader because 'in charge' seems like a good thing to be. There are those who want to be a leader because a promotion means success and if you don't get promoted you're not successful, apparently. If either of those is present, the first can be a sign of an internal issue of ego or confidence, and the second is not necessarily true. I'd also suggest that you take some time to evaluate what truly makes you feel fulfilled at work? For me, it's that I feel like things went better because I went to work that day than they would have had I not came in, and in a way beyond any old body in the seat. Because I knew something, or could see something, I influenced good things to happen. I've had that in most of my non-leader roles, but not all. I had two different leader roles, one I didn't much feel that, because of the nature of the business I was leading...there just wasn't that much I could do on a daily basis to affect outcomes. In the other, I had that very much, but then the organizational constraints on fixing the babysitting problems got to me, since I could see that improving more would mean getting the right people on the bus and the wrong off, but I couldn't get the wrong ones off the bus efficiently. If you understand what makes you feel fulfilled, look at the leadership role, and does it give you that?

My fulfillment can be achieved as an individual contributor, or as a leader, but in both cases, it depends on the circumstances. I would consider being a leader again, this whole deal with my boss taking another job has me wondering whether I want to take it on again, but it would have to be the right situation, 'cause I have a job now that fulfills me well, isn't so demanding that I feel like I'm giving up family time (well, other than just my work schedule entirely), and I'm financially comfortable.

And not to criticize, but I think at times you struggle with others' shortcomings. Now, sure, it seems like a manager would be able to fix that easily (just fire them), but it's not always that easy. In my case, it was organizational politics, in other cases, to find a person that's 100% what you need is so difficult that you have to learn to make due with someone that's 75% of it and fill the gap some other way...and that falls on you somehow...either to fill it yourself, or to somehow get it filled by someone else in a way that doesn't ruin their job satisfaction. I don't say that as something that makes me think you couldn't be a leader, but as something to think about keeping a handle on.
 
The stupid is multiplying. Not only do people have themselves convinced that Fred leaving this spring is a done deal, but they have already decided that they know the TJ is the heir. Not guessing - they know. I'm thinking of going over and asking for some Powerball numbers.

Poll on Fred's replacement - SMH

/end rant

I am avoiding those stupid threads like the plague. Because they are probably contagious.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.