I think we should speculate on Rhoads after this season. He gets a pass after that abomination last year. It was a perfect storm of crappy football.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was simply for the sake of the person's argument. I'm fully aware what it would look like minus the 2-10Why would you include a year he didn't coach. in the 2-10
He doesn't have happier feet than Richardson, that's for sure. Richardson never stands in there and hits the 2nd or 3rd option. He stares down option 1, and then runs if it isn't there.
All 3 guys have some major weaknesses. Not sure how many games we can win with any of them right now? If Lanning is really still in the running, that means neither Grant or Sam have gotten any better IMO, and that is downright scary.
I was not a Rohach fan last year as he struggled. But the last 2 games he did improve a lot. He made some good plays. I actually like the competition that is taking place. Not sure whether the info is accurate concerning Lanning being the #2 QB. IMO, Rohach is likely the #1. But if Rohach goes down during a game, I would bet that Richardson would likely get the nod because of his previous experience playing as a starter.
No he didn't. The last two games he played two crappy teams that had given up on the season and just wanted it to be over. Anybody could have looked decent at QB those last two games.
Quick name the last ISU coach to go to 3 bowl games in his first 5 years at ISU............................................................................................................
crickets?
Quick name the last ISU coach to go to 3 bowl games in his first 5 years at ISU............................................................................................................
crickets?
Quick name the last ISU coach to go to 3 bowl games in his first 5 years at ISU............................................................................................................
crickets?
Well yeah, but they were trending and were held accountable and had synergy and stuff like that.
It's kind of strange to me where all this negativity has come from. I thought people were excited about the wins at the end of the year and the Mangino hire, but it's almost like people waited till basketball was over to mourn last football season.
He doesn't have happier feet than Richardson, that's for sure. Richardson never stands in there and hits the 2nd or 3rd option. He stares down option 1, and then runs if it isn't there.
All 3 guys have some major weaknesses. Not sure how many games we can win with any of them right now? If Lanning is really still in the running, that means neither Grant or Sam have gotten any better IMO, and that is downright scary.
Seriously GMan, what part of the this equation do you not get? Go look at his film when he played the last 2 games of 2012 and tell me that 1. SR doesn't make great decisions 2. Tell me his TD/INT ratio in 2012 wasn't incredible for a first year QB, 3. That his running ability is above average for a QB 4. That he was extremely accurate, even in a 25-30 mph wind vs. WV and would have probably won that game if Woody doesn't fumble on the 3.
What's the difference between 2012 and 2013? 1. His OL was much better in 2012 2. He was HEALTHY in 2012 and was injured in the 1st game of the year in 2013 and tried to play hurt all year 3. His throwing ability was hindered dramatically (it is for any QB) with a bad ankle (try throwing a football with a gimpy ankle and we'll see how accurate you are) 4. He had NO Time in most cases in 2012 to set and throw and when he did 5. His WR's rarely got separation.
Sam Richardson, from what I saw in 2012 held a LOT of promise in a very average offense. Not Seneca like but an above average QB in his own right. Give him a good OC, a good OL, a Running game to back him up a little bit, and recovered confidence from last year's debacle...give him a chance. GR also is a coming along nicely and I really don't know which one is best suited for MM and what he wants to do? Those judging ANY of our QB's with last year's offensive line and coordinator situation and blaming the problems on the QB, really do not get football.
He doesn't have happier feet than Richardson, that's for sure. Richardson never stands in there and hits the 2nd or 3rd option. He stares down option 1, and then runs if it isn't there.
All 3 guys have some major weaknesses. Not sure how many games we can win with any of them right now? If Lanning is really still in the running, that means neither Grant or Sam have gotten any better IMO, and that is downright scary.
Not necessarily. I'm not discounting actual in-game reps, but all three guys have spent the exact same amount of time in Mangino's system. The lack of improvement would hold true if they were coming back for another season with Mess and his "scheme", but the fact that they're all starting from square one in a new offense works in Lanning's favor...less ground to make up.
Joel just needs to study his butt off and the job is his. He has all the physical parts, he just needs to become a counter expert, which is needed on the hot routes and quick hits. If he can get the mental side I don't see how anyone could beat him out.
In the spring game he struggled with accuracy, which was also a problem of his in high school. From what I could tell (granted through a very small body of work) Richardson and Rohach both through better balls as of now. He does have all the physical tools, but if Richardson and Rohach are more accurate I have trouble believing Joel would start, unless they are really confident in his ability and the ability of the o-line to have a zone read heavy offense.
In the spring game he struggled with accuracy, which was also a problem of his in high school. From what I could tell (granted through a very small body of work) Richardson and Rohach both through better balls as of now. He does have all the physical tools, but if Richardson and Rohach are more accurate I have trouble believing Joel would start, unless they are really confident in his ability and the ability of the o-line to have a zone read heavy offense.