It was a longshot anyway

[[/B]

Ivan's the man!!! He can play all 5 positions!



Good Lord! What a giant ego


By MIKE ULMER -- Toronto Sun

Chiriaev talks a big game



OAKVILLE -- "This," the principal of St. Thomas Aquinas High School reminded the unwashed media, "is a Catholic high school and as such we would expect the appropriate decorum."

Colin McGillicuddy was right. God is everywhere. He was at St. Thomas Aquinas yesterday in the form of a 7-foot-1 basketball player named Ivan Chiriaev. Just ask him.

"The NBA wants Ivan Chiriaev," Ivan Chiriaev said yesterday. "The NBA needs Ivan Chiriaev," added Ivan Chiriaev, who was there to announce Ivan Chiriaev was declaring Ivan Chiriaev eligible for the NBA draft in June.

Just why the NBA needs a 19-year-old-kid who knocked down a measly 16 points a night playing high school ball in Oakville (which no one has yet confused with the scene for Hoosiers II) is anyone's guess but one thing is sure: Ivan Chiriaev is NBA ready. He sounds like a jerk already.

In case you missed it -- perhaps you were mired in the boring details of your inconsequential lives -- a 7-foot-1 basketball player left St. Petersburg in Russia for Oakville in December 2002.

Since then, by virtue of a genetic wild card based in his pituitary, he has become a fashionable, albeit wildly speculative, choice to go in the first two rounds of the NBA draft.

By announcing for the draft, he may have closed the door to any potential scholarship. Ivan, pronounced Eee-van, said he had narrowed his choice of universities to a tidy five: Florida, LSU, Memphis, Syracuse and Iowa State. The winner, he said, would have been Iowa State, because it had the foresight to promise him he could play all five positions. "They were rebuilding for me and I could have made them one of the top 10 in the country," he said.

But the lure of NBA greatness, not to mention millions, was too great.

"I was told I had a great chance to go in the top five," he said, and again, who are we to argue with a deity. "If not the top five, then a lottery pick."

Among the other caveats:

"I will be the leader of the World team at the Hoops Summit," a USA basketball event that pits the world's best against the top U.S. high school players in an under-20 exhibition game. Not a player, mind you, a leader. "America and the world will get to see me play," he said, which will explain why all fighting across the world will cease April 4. Just thought you'd like to know.

If he does say so himself Ivan Chiriaev has a great work ethic. "That's what will make me an NBA all-star," he said.

Chiriaev said he can play point guard, but his chosen NBA position probably will be shooting guard. He stated this in the event some wayward NBA coach did not know which was the proper place to play him.

As a Catholic and, therefore, nuanced to the kind of decorum Colin McGillicuddy values so highly, it falls to me to, gently, point out a couple differences between Jesus, the deity under whose roof this news conference was called, and Ivan Chiriaev, who it appears merely thinks he's God.

THINKS HE'S GOD

First, Jesus was humble. He was a pacifist. He did not, as Chiriaev did, get himself suspended for 10 days for a fight with another student.

Second, Jesus spoke to everyone, tax collectors, prostitutes, assorted rounders. Ivan Chiriaev, through the helpful Colin McGillicuddy, informed one and all he would answer one, and only one question from newspaper reporters. Television guys were granted one-on-one interviews.

I didn't mind. Like many, I have often toyed with the question, if you could ask God only one question, what would it be?

Ivan Chiriaev v. Chuck Norris..... Rocky with a Kung Fu twist
 
I could be wrong, but he went and played in Europe, then redeclared last year and was promptly not selected again.
 
It may have been a longshot but we need to score on a longshot someday. A basketball team can totally change by 1 impact player
 
I agree, but Buckley will be coming in with a better frame than Diante did. Still believe we need another big for next season. We'll be guard deep with Garrett, Staiger, Peterson, Buckley, Eichmeyer, Haluska, Boozer, and Lee. Wish some of the weaker players weren't given scholarships to free them up for more forwards. Team already seems a little light on the bigs side. Does anyone know if Mac plans to remove any scholarships given to the walkons?


I hope you're kidding. One thing everyone needs to learn, if they haven't already this year, is NEVER count on a freshman. If we want immediate help in the backcourt, you either have to go Juco or find some 5 star STUD that is a one and done.
 
It may have been a longshot but we need to score on a longshot someday. A basketball team can totally change by 1 impact player


Careful, don't question Greg. He probably just didn't want the kid. As you have been able to tell over the last year, people aren't exactly knocking down the doors to come and play here.

We certainly do have an odd mix of players, at this point, on next years roster. But hey, years ago (89 i believe), Illinois had a team full of guys that were between 6'3 and 6'8, and they went to the final four with that group. They called that team the Flyin' Illini if I remember correctly, and they lost to Michigan, with Glen Rice in the Semis.

Of course Lou Henson let that group run and be athletic. Of course that team had Kendall Gill, Kenny Battle, etc on it so he could. But Brian Peterson is close.
 
I swear, #1 has two accounts now.
 
Six options at PG next year? You are funny.

1. Garrett
2. Petey
3. Buckley
4. Staiger
5. Ike
6. Lee

I am not saying they are all options as starter, but the depth is there. Nothing funny about it.

At center:

1. Brackins
2. Thompson
3. Hamilton

Hamilton is probably not going to be a viable option here, so we really only have two options.

Don't get me wrong, I want Appleton to come to ISU very, very bad, but I would trade him for a shot blocking rebounding big of similar quality in a heartbeat.
 
Careful, don't question Greg. He probably just didn't want the kid. As you have been able to tell over the last year, people aren't exactly knocking down the doors to come and play here.

We certainly do have an odd mix of players, at this point, on next years roster. But hey, years ago (89 i believe), Illinois had a team full of guys that were between 6'3 and 6'8, and they went to the final four with that group. They called that team the Flyin' Illini if I remember correctly, and they lost to Michigan, with Glen Rice in the Semis.

Of course Lou Henson let that group run and be athletic. Of course that team had Kendall Gill, Kenny Battle, etc on it so he could. But Brian Peterson is close.

Alright mods, that was a blatant, unnecessary attack on one of our players. Time to take some action here.
 
I swear, #1 has two accounts now.


Dude, it was a joke, lighten up.:smile:

I'm sorry that anything that even remotely critical of Coach McDermott offends you and so many others. And I hope that Wes Eichmeyer is the second coming of Pete Maravich for the people on this site.


But for all of the names that people have dropped on this site being interested in Iowa State, we have so far signed 4 3 star players. Of course stars don't matter, just look at all of the 1 and 2 stars playing at UCLA (and, until Love came in, they were a BORING team to watch also).
 
Read the last line.


I am not trying to question your knowledge of the game, but did you see that 89 Illinois team play??? Better yet, do you think Brian Peterson is athletic???

Do you think that in the scouting reports other coaches have for us, that there is a special section devoted to Brian Peterson's athleticism???

I was proud of him Saturday, he actually got to the basket for a three point play. But he has been called for five seconds more times than he has beaten someone off the dribble.

You need to lighten up there friend, or maybe take a break from watching the games, I think that you are taking this a little too personally.


However, if you are related to Brian, or are his friend, then I apologize.
 
I am not trying to question your knowledge of the game, but did you see that 89 Illinois team play??? Better yet, do you think Brian Peterson is athletic???

Do you think that in the scouting reports other coaches have for us, that there is a special section devoted to Brian Peterson's athleticism???

I was proud of him Saturday, he actually got to the basket for a three point play. But he has been called for five seconds more times than he has beaten someone off the dribble.

You need to lighten up there friend, or maybe take a break from watching the games, I think that you are taking this a little too personally.


However, if you are related to Brian, or are his friend, then I apologize.

Dude, I joke as much as anyone here, but I don't find making fun of our players humorous. They give their all every game and deserve respect for it, not ridicule.

You my friend need to rethink your definition of humor.
 
Relax man, I don't think he is 'making fun' of him, jeesh. Just like Bilas said on Cotlar the other day, just because he thinks Collison is the best PG in the country doesn't mean he hates everyone else. Petey couldn't have played on the 89' Illini team, I think everyone knows that...
 
Relax man, I don't think he is 'making fun' of him, jeesh. Just like Bilas said on Cotlar the other day, just because he thinks Collison is the best PG in the country doesn't mean he hates everyone else. Petey couldn't have played on the 89' Illini team, I think everyone knows that...

What is the point of bringing it up in the first place?

Anyway, I'm done with it.

I think we are going to be in good shape in our back court next year, and great shape if Appleton shocks the college basketball world by picking ISU.
 
It's one thing to question the coach who makes 3/4 of a $1 million, but its another thing to question bash BP because of his talent. Especially when BP is giving everything he has to the team and program. It's so easy to sit on your high horse like you have all of the answeres...but in reality, it's obvious you don't.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron