Can KSU stop our spread offense?

Boy, this thread has devolved. We've had game 1, which is usually pretty weak for an offense, then game 2 against a top 10 team with a great defense on their field, also usually pretty weak for an offense. I think we'll see a better ISU offense on the field Saturday than we did the first two weeks. I'm thinking 30 or more points, with 100+ yards for ARob and 50+ yards rushing for AA, and maybe 30 or 40 for SJ. I don't see more points as I think the inconsistent passing game will continue. Will 30 be enough to win with the defense getting thin in the front 7? Who knows? I'm looking for a Cyclone win, 31-27. Go State!
 
You convinced me, 15 game shas been long enough to prove his worth at our historically strong football school. We should fire him.

Seriously this BS about just throwing blame all over certain individuals is a bunch of ********.

Was it Hermans fault that we couldn't stop Kansas last year? Was it his fault ARob was injured for the KSU game last year? Was it his fault we were in an illegal formation in the NIU game when AA went for a TD? Is it his fault that AA wasn't accurate, the line didn't block and the WRs didn't catch last week?

Don't get me wrong, our offense has not been what I imagined and I am disappointed. I am also, however, not shortsighted enough to think that it was likely for him to turn this around in one year. The talent isn't there, plain and simple. to think he could have brought it in in one class is ridiculous.

As for the JUCO QB bit-Who was the guy we were supposed to go get? My lord, I didn't imagine one loss could turn everyone against the whole team.
A lot of that actually is coaching. I will expand a little
  1. OL Run blocking- According to our coaches, our OL is as good or better than last year yet we continually miss blocking assignments. Now we replace two on the OL but Burris played last year. That falls on coaching. a good example was iowa stunting. We were not prepared nor did we adjust when it happened.
  2. Dropped balls- Now some receivers have a tendency to drop balls but we are seeing guys that have shown good hands in the past dropping balls. Franklin, Lenz, ARob, Williams all have multiple drops this year. I could be wrong but Darks might be the only receiver without a drop.
  3. WRs not getting off the bump/jam- Why is it Arnaud looked better against NIU. Looked more accurate? Well iowa was knocking our receivers off routes. There are ways to combat that but we do not do it.
  4. Playcalling- We have greatly improved our WR blocking (good coaching). It has shown in both games, yet when we found iowa's soft spot on the edge of the field we did not attack it. Instead we ran and threw the ball into the teeth of their defense for the second straight year.
  5. In game adjustments- We make none or very few. As Herman says "we are what we are, we do what we do."
I won't get into tailoring your offense to the players strengths because I have no issue with a staff having a system and sticking with the system until they get their players. People whined and ******* about chizdick doing it but it is how programs are built.

It is very simple for people to blame the whole offensive struggles on Arnaud. I find it hilarious. We had 5 drives in the first half against iowa. The first two would have been extended if not for dropped passes. Tough catches, but catches that should have been made and have been made in the past. The third drive had a throw away, a tipped pass, and another drop. Again, those are not on the QB. The fourth drive had a 5 yard pass on 3rd and 7. Arnaud didn't run that route or call that play. BTW- the play would have been negated on a tripping call anyway. The fifth drive was a good drive that was halted by a BS pass interference penalty. 5 drives no points and really not the fault of the QB. We were down 28-0 at that time. Of course, he looked like crapola in the second half. He was pressing and trying to force things.
 
1. Asking "can KSU stop our spread offense" infers we have one to start with. Currently, we don't.
2. I hope not, but until the offense shows it gives defenses fits, the chances are better for KSU stopping it than not
3. The typical "ball watchers" will continue to put all blame on AA - while unable to see the receivers are getting no separation from defenders. The WR separation issue is not an opinion, it's a fact.
People wonder why Arnaud forces passes. Well when your receivers don't get separation then a lot of passes are going to get forced. I am not saying Arnaud doesn't need to get better. He does but the offense as a whole does not look good right now. iowa had something to do with that so we will see if it continues.
 
You tell me what the gameplan was on Saturday to stop Iowa's relentless defensive line? You do understand that there are ways to abuse over pursuing defensive lines, right? Is dropping your QB back in the pocket and scanning the entire field looking for WRs 10 yds down the field the way to take advantage of Iowa's d-line? Tell me. Because that was obviously Tom Herman's plan.

I don't remember seeing one of those WR swing bubble screen plays we saw about 20 times against NIU ran against Iowa? Oh wait, we did run one. It was our last offensive play of the game for a TD. I don't remember any screens to Arob or any other RB of ours? Let's see.... how about some mis-direction or counter plays to keep Iowa's DEs honest? Nope. How about 2-3 deep balls (fly patterns) with Sed, so Iowa's safeties couldn't play 8 yds from the line of scrimmage all day long? Nope. Mostly just AA standing in the pocket trying to find an open guy somewhere like a dead duck. Great strategy.

Someone tell me why we would run like 20 of those quick WR swing passes against NIU, but not one against Iowa? That HAD to be the gameplan. You don't just completely abandon something we ran, and ran well, a TON of times the week before without that being part of the gameplan. The gameplan had to be... "throw out those quick WR swing passes." It had to be. Why else did we not see it... EVER.

Running those quick swing passes and screens to the sidelines "spreads" the defense out from sideline to sideline and helps to open up the middle for the run game and pass to the TE down the seam. And no deep passes to "spread" the defense out vertically. As I said... Iowa "spread" us out WAY more. Their so-called vanilla conservative offense was WAY more "spread" than ours. How often did they go deep on us? It was a sad gameplan.. period.
EXACTLY!!!!!!!! That is what i ssaw all day. We had success on the edges of the field yet were rarely went there. The pitch to ARo b worked well. One swing pass worked well. They worked because iowa had everyone inside the hashes. And guess what. That is where we went witht he run game and the pass.
 
actually we tried throwing the "deep ball" 5 times last year against iowa. Tyler sash enjoyed most of them. Greenwood the rest.
I wouldn't call those deep as much as intermediate routes. Deep is over top the safeties. Those passes were underneath the safeties. Deep is what we threw against Nebraska and minnesota
 
Good grief. Tough to throw the deep ball when...

- Pass protection is suspect
- Receivers can't separate from defenders

Currently our best deep threat, IMO, is Franklin on the seem route.
IMO- Pass protection has been decent. Not as good as last year but last year was exceptional. even against iowa, we had time to make 90% of the throws.
 
If AA or Tiller cannot prove that they can hit the broad side of a barn, we may have no other option?

Put AA under center with Woody in the backfield and Arob and Shontrelle on either side in the wingback spots... about where the TE usually goes, but a step or two back from the line of scrimmage. Then run the option out of that. Either fake it or hand it off to Woody up the gut, and then have either ARob or Shontrelle trailing behind AA on the option... depending on which side you run it to. You can also have a WR or two to throw to if you decide to drop back and throw it.

I know we'll never run that, and I doubt it would even work, but it would be fun to see.

I think our current offense is fine, if it is run right. I've heard Tom Herman explain it before... you try to "spread" the defense out all over the field. Make them run sideline to sideline. Make them cover you vertically as well. Spread them out, and then take advantage of them in space. My problem in the Iowa game, was that we never even tried to spread them out. Never. And on top of that, AA almost always gave the ball to ARob up the gut versus keeping it himself around the outside. For that to work right, you HAVE to keep the ball now and then to make Iowa's DEs play you straight up. We didn't. It was so easy for Iowa to stop us it wasn't funny.
We didn't his year and we didn't last year. Everything we run is down the middle of the field. Yes, the zone read is going to be down the middle but our pass plays don't need to be down the middle. Even one of our most successful playe, ARob runing the wheel route, went down the middle. Why? Why not have Arob run that down the sideline making the LB move out with him. Opens the field up for Arnaud to scramble
 
The whole idea with the spread and hurry up offense is to spread the defense out and to keep the other team from making substitutions, and make them run to the line of scrimmage and wait for the offense to dictate when things start. In theory it will work, but you have to make first downs to make it work. 3 and outs are not acceptable. Until the offense can consistently make first downs, this offense really works against the ISU defense be getting them back on the field even faster than a normal pro set. Not saying it is a bad offense, but like any offense if your players can't run it right, it will not work.
Huh? The whole idea of the spread is to spread the field. Spread the defense and creat space for players to make plays. That is it. The no huddle is to prevent substitutions and then allow the OC to read the defense and change the play. We don't run a "hurry up" offense. We didn't saturday and we won't 80% of the time.

BTW- The no huddle has very little effect on iowa because they don't change personnel very often.
 
Boy, this thread has devolved. We've had game 1, which is usually pretty weak for an offense, then game 2 against a top 10 team with a great defense on their field, also usually pretty weak for an offense. I think we'll see a better ISU offense on the field Saturday than we did the first two weeks. I'm thinking 30 or more points, with 100+ yards for ARob and 50+ yards rushing for AA, and maybe 30 or 40 for SJ. I don't see more points as I think the inconsistent passing game will continue. Will 30 be enough to win with the defense getting thin in the front 7? Who knows? I'm looking for a Cyclone win, 31-27. Go State!
The first two games are a continuation of last year. The playcalling against iowa was not good. Not good at all. For two straight years we run 90% of our plays into the teeth of their defense.

I liked what I saw against NIU but we didn't run that against iowa. I am with you though, we should put up numbers against KSU. Their defense is probably the worst we have senn this season.
 
I think all the points made in this threa are valid, the offense stinks. It hasn't been impressive since Herman got here, not blaming him, its just a fact the offense hasn't clicked yet.The pointless part about this thread is that most of these same people will consider this problem solved if we beat Kstate.
 
Huh? The whole idea of the spread is to spread the field. Spread the defense and creat space for players to make plays. That is it. The no huddle is to prevent substitutions and then allow the OC to read the defense and change the play. We don't run a "hurry up" offense. We didn't saturday and we won't 80% of the time.

BTW- The no huddle has very little effect on iowa because they don't change personnel very often.

Exactly, it is pointless against the Hawks. A sped up version would work much better.
 
I think all the points made in this threa are valid, the offense stinks. It hasn't been impressive since Herman got here, not blaming him, its just a fact the offense hasn't clicked yet.The pointless part about this thread is that most of these same people will consider this problem solved if we beat Kstate.
I won't. I want consistency and I want to see the offense work against decent competition. I fully expect to put up numbers on KSU. Their defense is okay at best. We faced the toughest defense we will face all year so we should see better production from here on out.
 
1. Get the ball out of arnauds hand quickly
2. Arnaud can't complete slant passes and struggles to throw screens and hitches accurately as well. This is what i have observed.

This is a problem

Yeah dually you are right on Austin Arnaud at Quarterback is a "BIG PROBLEM"...
 
Just win Farmageddon Cyclones....come on.

Farmageddon.jpg
 
KSU defense is no where close to how good Iowa's is. Iowa probably does have the best defense in the nation...sadly to say

This: Iowa's D is the best we will see this year. However, if KSU stops us as easily as Iowa did......lets just say it will be a LONG LONG year. That said, I think we can move the ball on K-State.
 
I think a big problem is running our zone option read play 60% of the time. On first... and then second downs. Sometimes we break it. Most of the time... we get one or two yards and then we're left with a 3rd and 8 or worse. I'd like to see some more creativity.

We had this problem several years ago under Dan. Everyone in the stadium knew what plays were coming.:shocked:
 
It is very simple for people to blame the whole offensive struggles on Arnaud. I find it hilarious. We had 5 drives in the first half against iowa. The first two would have been extended if not for dropped passes. Tough catches, but catches that should have been made and have been made in the past. The third drive had a throw away, a tipped pass, and another drop. Again, those are not on the QB. The fourth drive had a 5 yard pass on 3rd and 7. Arnaud didn't run that route or call that play. BTW- the play would have been negated on a tripping call anyway. The fifth drive was a good drive that was halted by a BS pass interference penalty. 5 drives no points and really not the fault of the QB. We were down 28-0 at that time. Of course, he looked like crapola in the second half. He was pressing and trying to force things.

However, the passes were not very accurate. This was the problem. The passes were short, long, over the wrong shoulder, and too near the defender. AA also does not move around enough to get the clear open passing lanes. He has not shown a lob pass into an open area for receiver to run to. When he fathoms that, he will be much improved. If not, we very run or dumnp the ball off quick the slow, grinding way.

When the weather gets cold, how well will our receivers catch the ball when the pass is off target?

As far as coaching adjustments, it does not appear we are an adjustment team for one reason or another.

Unusual/unpredicted playcalling? Not us. Not yet.
 
This staff and these players all need to come together right now for this season to have major success. We cannot lose this game. We have to have it.

Hopefully this week, whatever hasn't been working....has just been thrown out the window. Our guys need to get on K-State early and often...then play the game down the stretch with some swagger.

Arnaud just needs something big to happen early for him in the game too. Whether it be a nice long pass or he takes off for a big 15 yard gain....he needs something positive very early for him to shake off the cobwebs.

These jerks in purple won last year by blocking a freaking field goal. That bitter taste is still in my mouth and I am sure it is in the players. They need to come together this weekend for one common goal, beat this mildcat team down and get payback.