Not true on either accusation. The article notes parallels between two coaches - I added context to the comparison. No opinions, only facts. How can you get angry about a simple accounting of facts?
You only highlighted the negative and you know it. The state of the programs when each coach took over weren't even in the same universe.
MSU before Izzo: 1124-860 .567
ISU before Fennelly: 141-247 .363
Izzo's predecessor: 340-220 .607
Bill's predecessor: 18-63 .222
MSU wins in the two seasons before Izzo: 20, 22
ISU wins in the two seasons before Bill: 8, 2
NCAA tournaments total before Izzo: 11 (including 1 champ, 2 FF, 4 E8, 6 S16)
NCAA tournaments total before Bill: Zero
Sure, Bill hasn't had as much success as Izzo, but what he built he built from scratch. Bill was handed a 30 year old Yugo that didn't run and had been rotting in a barn. Izzo was handed a three year old Buick with all the bells and whistles.
There wasn't even a suggestion in the story of comparing what Izzo had accomplished to what Bill had accomplished. It only states that they have been at their programs for the same amount of time - and nothing else.
Even Bill has said that he doesn't think there should be any comparison between what Mulkey accomplished and what he has. He is humble about it - stop tearing him down.
People are getting really sick of your axe grinding. If you want to start another thread about how much you don't like Bill as a coach nobody is stopping you, but quit shitting all over this thread.