Cracks in the B1G?

When you use quotes you’re supposed to be actually quoting something someone said not your own weird interpretation.

My point again to spell it out is that Michigan has zero need of unequal revenue sharing as they already have so much money and can turn on the money cannon at will whenever it’s needed.
If “they’re a non-profit entity that doesn’t need money” - is it that wild of a question? Man it will be fun to see the meltdown when the blue bloods either break off or get unequal revenue sharing
Couple reasons starting from the fact that Michigan has more money then just about anyone else so they don’t need it and more importantly Michigan wouldn’t want to do anything that helps OSU which this would.

Yep, good news it’s a university not a cooperation or individual. It’s very much a not for profit entity
I’m done here but just want to point out that everything in my quote is something you said….
 
  • Like
Reactions: VeloClone
Oh no MSU is in far worse shape, that’s a combo of the Tucker issue, getting a new coach, AD, and the house settlement. Far different position then Michigan
Explain how a university expenses an item in 2023-24 that wasn’t even approved until June 6, 2025?
 
I’m done here but just want to point out that everything in my quote is something you said….
Yep that’s like me taking words you said, mixing them together in a quote. I specifically didn’t say what you said.

I made two separate points on two seperate points you made and you combined them into one quote to misrepresent.

Not sure what English classes you took but that’s not how quoting someone works…it’s really important that you know this otherwise, we’ll just wow
 
  • Creative
Reactions: State2015
I agree with your assertion; however, is anyone really excited to see OSU, Michigan, Bama, Georgia, Texas, and and maybe Oregon, USC, Penn State, and a handful of other potential National Title contenders battle it out every season. I, for one, am not.
I am not sure they play one another exclusively. I think they will want to retain some of their tier one rights to sell as they see fit.
 
Explain how a university expenses an item in 2023-24 that wasn’t even approved until June 6, 2025?
I’m gonna need you to be a little more clear and also if your asking me to explain accounting practices I’m not gonna be able to answer you with any real specifics
 
I usually despise Shadenfreude behavior and thoughts; however, I hope Michigan and OSU get an even bigger slice of the B1G revenue. I am sick of the Hawkeye fans and their snide remarks concerning the Big 12 and the Cyclones.
Almost all of the comments are coming from fans whose teams are doing worse than Iowa State competitively.

“Well our conference makes more money than you and we have a better TV deal.” Has to be the dumbest thing that has started with this realignment ****.
 
Almost all of the comments are coming from fans whose teams are doing worse than Iowa State competitively.

“Well our conference makes more money than you and we have a better TV deal.” Has to be the dumbest thing that has started with this realignment ****.
Anyone that uses that as an argument is a moron. Rutgers isn’t happy just because they are getting paid, the on the field/court outcomes matter
 
Yep that’s like me taking words you said, mixing them together in a quote. I specifically didn’t say what you said.

I made two separate points on two seperate points you made and you combined them into one quote to misrepresent.

Not sure what English classes you took but that’s not how quoting someone works…it’s really important that you know this otherwise, we’ll just wow
Man why are you even here lol
 
This is what I suspect the underlying feelings of fanbases who have switched conferences are. Almost all of them would they're happy, or that they "had to do it" because that's what we do as fans (we do the same).

Legitimately excited: Texas, BYU, Cincy, UCF, Houston, Arizona, Colorado, Oregon, SMU, Louisville

Tell you they're excited, but secretly hate it: Nebraska, Oklahoma, Mizzou, Maryland, A&M (now that Texas joined - they were previously legitimately excited)

Honest about it being their best option, but not overly enthused: Arizona State, WVU, Rutgers, Pitt, Cuse, USC, Washington

Openly hate it: Utah, Cal, Stanford
 
This is what I suspect the underlying feelings of fanbases who have switched conferences are. Almost all of them would they're happy, or that they "had to do it" because that's what we do as fans (we do the same).

Legitimately excited: Texas, BYU, Cincy, UCF, Houston, Arizona, Colorado, Oregon, SMU, Louisville

Tell you they're excited, but secretly hate it: Nebraska, Oklahoma, Mizzou, Maryland, A&M (now that Texas joined - they were previously legitimately excited)

Honest about it being their best option, but not overly enthused: Arizona State, WVU, Rutgers, Pitt, Cuse, USC, Washington

Openly hate it: Utah, Cal, Stanford
Where would you put UCLA all 238 of their fans?
 
Agreed. Knowing one’s favorite team will likely never make a conference championship again and therefore boasting about media deals is sad to watch.
Agree. Similar to openly denigrating an organization and situation you would join in a heartbeat if given the chance.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cyfanatic