Why ISU should be #2 in the BCS

CloneFan65

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
2,861
1,364
113
Phoenix, AZ
Despite what the pollsters and computers say, I have evidence that the Cyclones should be in the BCS Championship game. Here is how ISU is better than 9 of the top 10 teams in the BCS. (If KU loses one of its final games, ISU would be #1!)

ISU beat Iowa, who beat Syracuse, who beat Louisville, who beat Cincinnati, who beat Oregon State, who beat California, who beat #2 Oregon, who beat #8 Arizona State.

ISU beat Colorado, who beat #4 Oklahoma, who beat #5 Missouri.

ISU beat Iowa, who beat Illinois, who beat #7 Ohio State.

ISU beat Iowa, who beat Syracuse, who beat Louisville, who beat Cincinnati, who beat South Florida, who beat #6 West Virginia.

ISU beat Iowa, who beat Syracuse, who beat Louisville, who beat Cincinnati, who beat Oregon State, who beat California, who beat Tennessee, who beat #9 Georgia.

ISU beat Iowa, who beat Syracuse, who beat Louisville, who beat Cincinnati, who beat Oregon State, who beat California, who beat Tennessee, who beat South Carolina, who beat Kentucky, who beat #1 LSU, who beat #10 Virgina Tech.


 
We need to get the word out, we're being screwed our legitimate title rights!




:biglaugh:
 
where does Kevin Bacon come into play on this? Before Cincinnati or after LSU?
 
Another reason why we can't trust the computers to figure out who should be in the BCS. This makes perfect sense.
 
I noticed Iowa was in there quite a few times. This must mean ISU beat a really quality Iowa team then! WOOOOOOO!!!!

So wait. Should Iowa be #1 in the BCS then?
 
NOOOO!!! Iowa doesn't belong because they lost to ISU in the Super Bowl, duh!
 
But..

if ISU beat Iowa, who beat Syracuse, who beat Louisville, who beat Cincinnati, who beat Miami (OH), who beat Kent St who beat ISU...

Does that mean we beat ourselves?
 
But..

if ISU beat Iowa, who beat Syracuse, who beat Louisville, who beat Cincinnati, who beat Miami (OH), who beat Kent St who beat ISU...

Does that mean we beat ourselves?

Well gees, we're not perfect:spinny: