We left behind what we did best..

Beyerball

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 18, 2013
7,575
7,105
113
Texas
And that is running the fball. This program under McCarney and even earlier was known for having pretty salty RBs and a decent Oline. CPR made the decision to go with the flow and turn us into a spread and our offense since has been awful. It is too hard to recruit all that we need to run a good spread at ISU, it's hard enough recruiting at ISU. You have to have double the good players to run a good spread than a traditional run based offense. Just an observation. It's too late to change now. I do think if we keep this staff intact for another 3-5 years we will see a really good offense and that means MM staying.

On a side note, am I the only one that would like to see Syria run the ball 15 times a game?
 
I wish we would have gone to the triple option like Navy. Make teams prepare for us. Shorten the game up. You dont need as much talent. Which we cant sustain that good of talent in Ames anyway.
 
I hate the spread, but if we are going to stick with it we need to change it up to something like Auburn's Offense. Auburn has a spread O and they run the ball all the time.
 
I wish we would have gone to the triple option like Navy. Make teams prepare for us. Shorten the game up. You dont need as much talent. Which we cant sustain that good of talent in Ames anyway.

Gimmick offenses make recruiting quality players harder, not easier. That's like re-running the Walden experiment.
 
In the pre-spread days (and the supposed "running" days) plenty of us used to complain about the offensive system and hope we switch to spread.
 
Option is not a gimmick offense. Several national titles have been won. With it. How do we compete with texas and the rest if we run the same offense with less talent. Bottom line is we dont.
 
We were way better up front on both sides of the ball when DMAC was here. We have been aweful in that area under CPR, particularly on defense. People rave about Shane Burnham but his lines have been aweful. DMAC had guys like Tyson Smith, James Reed, Nick Leaders, Jordan Carstens, Jason Berryman, and Brett Curvey.
 
I would love to see an offense similar to KSU. Put the emphasis on recruiting road grader lineman (not light and quick) and let the OL dictate the flow of the offensive game. When you have a very good OL you don't need top notch skill players, they are nice to have however.
 
Option is not a gimmick offense. Several national titles have been won. With it. How do we compete with texas and the rest if we run the same offense with less talent. Bottom line is we dont.

Defenses today are too fast compared to the era where triple option won titles. Those teams (94,95 Nebraska) also had one of the best OLs of all time.

I think certain aspects of triple option could be effective but not an offense built on it.
 
I don't understand how spread offense is the reason we can't run the ball effectively?? We can't run the ball because we have an average to serviceable offensive line. If you were a "power" running team we would need an even better o-line.

A better issue to talk about would be quarterback play. And no I'm not talking about SR needing to go. I think our QB play when ISU was successful in football was the reason under DMAC. To have a spread offense you need an accurate QB, period.

People forget that although Seneca was an awesome runner, he was wicked accurate at throwing the ball. Same with Sage, accurate.
 
I don't understand how spread offense is the reason we can't run the ball effectively?? We can't run the ball because we have an average to serviceable offensive line. If you were a "power" running team we would need an even better o-line.

A better issue to talk about would be quarterback play. And no I'm not talking about SR needing to go. I think our QB play when ISU was successful in football was the reason under DMAC. To have a spread offense you need an accurate QB, period.

People forget that although Seneca was an awesome runner, he was wicked accurate at throwing the ball. Same with Sage, accurate.

We changed the type of OL we recruited from larger more power based, to smaller and more athletic. This has not worked out in our favor.
 
I don't understand how spread offense is the reason we can't run the ball effectively?? We can't run the ball because we have an average to serviceable offensive line. If you were a "power" running team we would need an even better o-line.

A better issue to talk about would be quarterback play. And no I'm not talking about SR needing to go. I think our QB play when ISU was successful in football was the reason under DMAC. To have a spread offense you need an accurate QB, period.

People forget that although Seneca was an awesome runner, he was wicked accurate at throwing the ball. Same with Sage, accurate.


Agreed. That's why I would like to see a system similar to KSU. Emphasis is on recruiting and developing very good OLs and finding skill guys to fit the system. OL recruitment and development under CPR appears to not get the focus it should. ISU will never win the recruiting battle for skill guys but ISU can be very competitive in recruiting OL with a run first system.
 
Wasn't the west coast offense pretty much designed for teams like ours.
 
Wasn't the west coast offense pretty much designed for teams like ours.

yeah, but you still have to be able to run, and we are inaccurate on deep balls. Further inhibiting our offense are the short throws which are mostly too high. Our most effective plays are intermediate throws. I think the goal should be a balanced Offense, but right now we need to spread it out and run an air raid type offense. Maybe we can get someone deep so wide open Sam doesn't need to loft it over a defender.
 
I thought west coast offenseused like short and intermediate timing routes to spread the defense then that sets up room for shots downfield and for scrambling and run plays.