Yeah, that's definitely what I said. You still mad about that fee that made it so you couldn't buy your Vespa?i know my life would be more complete if we finished 30 and not 32
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, that's definitely what I said. You still mad about that fee that made it so you couldn't buy your Vespa?i know my life would be more complete if we finished 30 and not 32
that's my point. does it really matter that ISU is 32nd and Baylor is slightly higher than us? Do recruits think "oh geez now I'll switch to Baylor?" None of this matter except for #1.
after all this time it still amazes me how sensitive people are. it's like a bunch of tiny politicians over-thinking every possible slight.
Just sharing information. If we did not do this and you did not respond what would this site look like?
![]()
![]()
![]()
that's my point. does it really matter that ISU is 32nd and Baylor is slightly higher than us? Do recruits think "oh geez now I'll switch to Baylor?" None of this matter except for #1.
after all this time it still amazes me how sensitive people are. it's like a bunch of tiny politicians over-thinking every possible slight.
...Baylor ahead of ISU, please.
Witchita State ahead of Duke, Kansas, and Florida.
Wow. Who votes for this crap?
There are lots of butthurt threads on this forum but I wouldn't count this as one of them.
1) Louisville
2) Michigan
3) Syracuse
4) Duke
5) Ohio St.
6) Kansas
7) Florida
8) Indiana
9) Marquette
10) Michigan St.
would be my top 10
"Being ranked 32" in a Top 25 poll is so far down in the noise it doesn't matter.
so, without looking, what were the final rankings for 2004? anyone know anyone beyond #2? If you do I can see your search history so you better not lie to me.
I think it would be more like "Confessions of ISU Geezers Who Can Barely Remember College" in the off seasons.
We are butthurt over anything and everything, surely you've been around long enough to know this.
any poll that weighs heavily on tournament results is bogus. It's freaking tournament, the best teams do not always advance. The proof a a good team that deserves high rankings are ones that can win consistently over a 2 month period in conference play. This means playing teams that know you well, know your personnel, know your weakness yet you are still able to beat them. This mean winning on the road in hostile environments. Ranking teams on how they advance in a tournament is somewhat ignorant. I do understand that some teams get hot and are actually better teams at the end of the year, but a teams body of work throughout the season should have a lot of merit as well. I mean, obviously Louisville and Michigan are great teams, but not because the went to the finals, that is part of it, but because they won big games all year, they did it consistently.
Think about this. What if Iowa State had beaten OSU? I bet they would have showed up way higher in this freaking poll. ISU didn't, but ISU is still the same team. So you are going to tell me that Iowa State drops back in this poll because they didn't advance to the sweet 16, and the team that beat them needed a home court, a key injury to one of ISU best players, and then bad calls to help pull it out means now all of the sudden ISU is not worthy of being ranked higher? Anyone with eyeballs could see ISU was a top 25 team at the end of the year. ISU's body of work was pretty good. They got blown out just once and lost 5 games on one possession.