Get up to speed Sparty Boy. ESPN was the sole bidder:
www.espn.com
No I knew the sole bidder thing, the stupid sub license thing for 2026 and beyond threw me off.Get up to speed Sparty Boy. ESPN was the sole bidder:
CFP, ESPN agree to $7.8B deal through '31-32
ESPN remains the sole media rights holder for the expanded College Football Playoff under a new six-year, $7.8 billion deal that runs through the 2031-32 season.
Yeah but that agreement further distances the SEC and B1G from the rest. Northwestern will be making >$21 million annually from the CFP alone, while the best team from the ACC will be making >$13 million. The best team from the Big 12 will be making >$12 million. So why would schools in the B1G and SEC willingly blow that system up as (I think?) you've been saying they will/would with the CST stuff?Get up to speed Sparty Boy. ESPN was the sole bidder:
CFP, ESPN agree to $7.8B deal through '31-32
ESPN remains the sole media rights holder for the expanded College Football Playoff under a new six-year, $7.8 billion deal that runs through the 2031-32 season.
I think it's funny how there are many schools in the Big 10 that are poor to mediocre at best in football who are on the same level playing field as everyone else in their conference for $$ distribution. I am a firm believer it's just a matter of time before the Michigan/OSU/PSU/USC/Wash/OR teams finally look at the Indiana, Maryland, NW, Purdon't, Minn, Rutgers, etc. and say "We're sick of carrying you guys along. We can make much more money without you guys"
They would make even more money in payouts with P4 inventory aggregation and bidding it out NFL style plus there would be rational geographic realignment. That is why Tennessee AD, Danny White, is a CST Ambassador.
But didn't all those other networks have the chance to bid on the expanded playoffs that ESPN just locked up as the sole bidder?
History speaks for itself. The bottom feeders of the Big 10 and SEC are not immune to realignment. It's always about money. And the elite programs will continue to find ways to allocate more of the money to themselves. These realignments are far from over
The B1G has been around since 1896 and has never once kicked out a member institution.
LOL - and you think that means all the teams are safe going forward?? Sorry buddy. Nobody is immune from realignment, not even Iowa
And the Pac 12 was around for over a hundred years and came out of the 2010 realignment looking like champs. Look where they are at now. Iowa will probably make the new super conference but if the powers in the Big Ten and SEC have a way to "merge" and shed the teams not bringing in the revenue they receive, why would they keep them?
Well unlike the situation with USCLAORWA, I doubt the bottom feeders of the B1G will actively be looking for ways out of the conference.
Yeah but the PAC was essentially dying as a conference. That's the exact opposite of where the B1G and SEC are. Comparing those situations is just kind of silly IMO.
This has been discussed a lot and the simple reason isn’t show elite programs stay elite by exploiting many inherent advantages they have. Moving into a 20 team super league will cause massive damage to those brands as they regularly rack up losing seasons. In addition to the fact that a 20 team super league would alienate so many fan bases that the ratings would tank and the money would dry up.
Why on earth would the B1G bottom feeders be looking for ways out of the conference?
Yeah, but they care more about saying "you can't sit with us" than anything. So who knows.
I never said the Big Ten (or SEC) is going to die. You are kidding yourself if you don't think that Michigan, OSU, USC, UW, OR, Bama, Georgia, Texas are just going to sit on their hands if they believe they can make more money by getting rid of teams not holding their weight. Just hope your hawks make the cut.
