If I had two cougars, I wouldn’t care how exhausting it was. They can take the life from my body.Have you ever taken in two cougars at once? It’s exhausting. Not to mention the wildcats. At least we took our time and spaced those out.
If I had two cougars, I wouldn’t care how exhausting it was. They can take the life from my body.Have you ever taken in two cougars at once? It’s exhausting. Not to mention the wildcats. At least we took our time and spaced those out.
So we’ve been through multiple divorces and we’re now the Crazy Cat Lady of Conferences?
Yep we need a big cat. Tiger will do.Well then Clemson makes tons of sense
We finally cracked Yormark’s code….Well then Clemson makes tons of sense
Nope. Oregon State and Wazzu are boned.Is there anyway we can admit Oregon St and Wassu? Maybe bring on a third streaming partner?
Those fans are us, we are them... Id rather have them over Utah and ASU (ASU fans I think don't care, but their president deserves purgatory)
Admittedly, those Big Ten Classic highlights of the 1997 Cornhuskers on BTN really add prestige to the conferenceIt’s funny they have the B1G as “Prestige.” Outside of one B1G school, Ohio State, and a PAC school, USC, the last champ from the B1G was 1997 with Michigan and Nebraska sharing the title. Lots of freeloaders in there over the last 25+ years.
I don’t think it is the same unless the teams all have the same protected rivalries. If the protected rivalries are:10000000%
what dont people get about that?
we call it "pods" you'll get your d*ck chopped off
call it "protected rivalries" and its unicorns and rainbows.
its the same thing
Is there anyway we can admit Oregon St and Wassu? Maybe bring on a third streaming partner?
Those fans are us, we are them... Id rather have them over Utah and ASU (ASU fans I think don't care, but their president deserves purgatory)
i suppose thats a valid pointI don’t think it is the same unless the teams all have the same protected rivalries. If the protected rivalries are:
CU: KU, KSU, UU
ISU: KU, KSU, WVU
KU: CU, ISU, KSU
KSU: CU, ISU, KU
What’s the pod?
You have a point here. Many years ago a very good businessman I knew was offered an opportunity to buy into a fledgling company that was absorbed by Comcast. After the sales presentation he said I'll take all I can get. Maybe we are at the same point with ASU and Utah. I guess we'll see.If Washington and Oregon go to the Big 10 I'm pretty indifferent to taking ASU and Utah. I'd rather save room for Pitt, Va Tech or NC State then add 2 teams that don't seem interested in the Big12.
The idea of growing to 20 teams or something like that when 6 or more of those schools are “dragged here,” sullenly kicking the dirt about being stuck in a stupid truck-stop conference instead of playing “real” football, is not enticing to me.Guarantee everyone of those 8 think they should be in the B1G or $EC. No way you get four slotted for the BigXII to collude when, even though the money is better, it’s far different.
Whipped it outWhat exactly did ASU pres Crow do lastnight specifically?
You’re right. It’s funny that the B1G is proud of the play on the field but glosses over the partial qualifier, unlimited walk-ons scheme, and institutional steroid use that Nebby built its legacy on.Admittedly, those Big Ten Classic highlights of the 1997 Cornhuskers on BTN really add prestige to the conference
Expectation is they announce the move this morning (Pacific time, so could be afternoon for people not on the West Coast)What is the actual status of Arizona right now, the Big 12 has invited them but the Arizona Board of Regents hasn’t let the Arizona President accept yet?
Because it seems to me the Arizona Board of Regents doesn’t want to split up the schools and ASU’s President is currently working a last ditch effort to keep the PAC together. That doesn’t feel to me like Arizona is a sure thing yet (which could change very quickly but not as of right now).