Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

bgprest

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2008
907
594
93
Dallas, TX
All of this angst toward the idea of having pods. Maybe it's just the terminology that bothers people. Call them cobs, more fitting for the corn belt, of course if we get Utah, then tubers?
 

Pope

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 7, 2015
10,547
23,964
113
Streaming is all about demand, period.

The Pac's media package proposal will require an add-on Apple subscription. In other words, PAC fans will have to pay $7/month for Apple TV access, plus whatever the Pac subscription fee is.

Judging by how bad their in-person game attendance is, I'd say it will be darn near impossible for them to achieve any significant escalator benchmarks.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: HFCS

2122

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2021
1,436
1,836
113
63
Oregon
Oregon St
Wash
Wash St
Stanford
Utah
California

what the hell are these schools suppose to do?? it's getting to point someone has to step in and be like ok enough fighting over every damn penny let's all get together and figure out what the future of college football looks like. cause let's be real football revenue drives all of this 10x more than anything else.

it's 2023. how is there not more structure at this point.
University types ain't known for common sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoldCy and DFWClone

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,131
7,731
113
Dubuque
The NCAA is the schools. The schools never allowed the NCAA to have the level of power necessary, on a wide range of issues.
IMO the only thing that could have kept college football "like-the-good-old-days" was have all P5 schools under a single media rights deal back around 2000-2010.

Once the money gap between conferences grew, schools were going to follow the money to the Big10/SEC.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: tzjung

Cylone999

Member
Nov 20, 2011
52
21
8
Streaming is all about demand, period.

The Pac's media package proposal will require an add-on Apple subscription. In other words, PAC fans will have to pay $7/month for Apple TV access, plus whatever the Pac subscription fee is.

Judging by how bad their in-person game attendance is, I'd say it will be darn near impossible for them to achieve any significant escalator benchmarks.
If it's like the MLS package, it would also be available standalone. MLS is $15 a month standalone vs $13 a month on top of Apple TV+. But you are correct about the escalators. It will be more like a moving sidewalk.
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,625
23,880
113
Macomb, MI
IMO the only thing that could have kept college football "like-the-good-old-days" was have all P5 schools under a single media rights deal back around 2000-2010.

Once the money gap between conferences grew, schools were going to follow the money to the Big10/SEC.

The possibility of what you suggest went out the window in the 1980s when Oklahoma successfully sued the NCAA to gain separate media negotiation rights for the individual conferences. In other words, yes - OU kicked off this **** show 40 years ago.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,793
24,888
113
That was awesome. 30 seconds to come to order, vote to go dark and end without any further public comment.

Makes you wonder though. If this were really about the agenda item, compensation for the president or whatever it was, would they have gone dark? So we at least know that they are discussing it and it may just be Arizona informing ASU of their intentions formally. Perhaps we even see resolution tonight or a request to join.
 

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,580
23,427
10,030
So the forum has been pretty quiet lately, anybody have ideas of something else to do?



:jimlad:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: aauummm