Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

Clonedogg

Well-Known Member
Sep 4, 2009
2,515
1,861
113
CR, IA
biblehub.com
Dodd's interview with The Arizona AD. Pretty transparent, basically if the deal is close (~2mil) the PAC10 will stay together. If the money below the B12 deal is more than that Arizona is open for business was my interpretation.

Good article
 

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,650
10,133
113
38
The only downside I can think of is the program falling out of relevance after Few is no longer the coach. As long as that program continues as a top basketball brand, I don't really see a downside.
That legit can happen to any basketball program, look at Louisville, Georgetown, Indiana, nova, etc. Losing an awesome coach can always set a program back a couple years. The zags have built a pretty good brand and I don’t know if few is leaving anytime soon
 
  • Optimistic
  • Agree
Reactions: tzjung and Gorm

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,527
74,289
113
Ankeny
That legit can happen to any basketball program, look at Louisville, Georgetown, Indiana, nova, etc. Losing an awesome coach can always set a program back a couple years. The zags have built a pretty good brand and I don’t know if few is leaving anytime soon

Sure, but I think its much more of a downside risk for a tiny school that has only really had success under one coach.

Like, most P5 schools at least have a floor of an audience of their own fans when they're down. Gonzaga's floor is much, much lower
 

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,650
10,133
113
38
Sure, but I think its much more of a downside risk for a tiny school that has only really had success under one coach.

Like, most P5 schools at least have a floor of an audience of their own fans when they're down. Gonzaga's floor is much, much lower
Yep totally agree but I bet they get added for only a couple mil. At that price it’s hard to see a downside.
 

CoKane

Well-Known Member
Oct 26, 2013
18,197
11,886
113
Cedar Rapids
The only downside I can think of is the program falling out of relevance after Few is no longer the coach. As long as that program continues as a top basketball brand, I don't really see a downside.
What about when they hire Tommy Lloyd away from Arizona due to him getting sick of playing Q3 and Q4 games exclusively on Apple Tv in front of 12 fans?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Gorm

Pope

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 7, 2015
10,562
23,984
113
Dodd's interview with The Arizona AD. Pretty transparent, basically if the deal is close (~2mil) the PAC10 will stay together. If the money below the B12 deal is more than that Arizona is open for business was my interpretation.

So if the PAC deal is $2 million less and basically all streaming, that's going to be good enough?? Hard to believe, especially when the long term life expectancy of the PAC is doubtful, regardless.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: tzjung

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,644
79,968
113
DSM
So if the PAC deal is $2 million less and basically all streaming, that's going to be good enough?? Hard to believe, especially when the long term life expectancy of the PAC is doubtful, regardless.

Article quoted the AZ President as saying the streaming/linear has to be at worst 50/50.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Cloneon

simply1

Rec Center HOF
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 10, 2009
45,725
34,469
113
Pdx
Sure, but I think its much more of a downside risk for a tiny school that has only really had success under one coach.

Like, most P5 schools at least have a floor of an audience of their own fans when they're down. Gonzaga's floor is much, much lower
Not sure, if the donor base is there then it’s likely to maintain. Creighton as an example maybe.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Gorm

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,142
7,736
113
Dubuque
Yep totally agree but I bet they get added for only a couple mil. At that price it’s hard to see a downside.
It will be interesting if it's just Gonzaga MBB or all their sports join the Big12. And by adding Gonzaga, do we see other non-football school(s) added to expose the Big12 to new markets. There could be a number of schools from the Big East that would make sense.

It's not the norm for a school to bounce between conferences like UConn, but there could be contractual language spelling out conditions for Gonzaga's continued Big12 membership.

But at this time UCLA, Arizona and Gonzaga are the 3 biggest college basketball brands on the west coast. So adding Gonzaga seems like a win/win as I would expect ESPN & FOX are on board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HouClone

1UNI2ISU

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2013
9,050
12,159
113
Waterloo
It will be interesting if it's just Gonzaga MBB or all their sports join the Big12. And by adding Gonzaga, do we see other non-football school(s) added to expose the Big12 to new markets. There could be a number of schools from the Big East that would make sense.

It's not the norm for a school to bounce between conferences like UConn, but there could be contractual language spelling out conditions for Gonzaga's continued Big12 membership.

But at this time UCLA, Arizona and Gonzaga are the 3 biggest college basketball brands on the west coast. So adding Gonzaga seems like a win/win as I would expect ESPN & FOX are on board.
It would have to be all sports, right? I don't think you can split off your basketball program by NCAA rules plus what league is going to want them without basketball?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: isucy86

HouClone

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2011
2,823
2,193
113
Houston
From reading the Gonzaga boards since the Big 12 interest, they generally are pleased with going to the Big 12. There are more "meh" posters than I was expecting however. They identify more with the Big East but know travel would be more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlySpartan

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron