Yeah, not seeing the problems there.Sounds like a win-win, sign me up for awkward right now.
Yeah, not seeing the problems there.Sounds like a win-win, sign me up for awkward right now.
you will when one brings a knife to the three way.Yeah, not seeing the problems there.
You weren’t very specific there. Is the knife for me or the other woman?you will when one brings a knife to the three way.
Care to find out?You weren’t very specific there. Is the knife for me or the other woman?
They’d keep Nebraska. The success isn’t there any more but the fans are. And that’s revenue. The other two would get curbedJust a thought on all this conference realignment: If they could, don't you think the Big Ten would dump Rutgers, Maryland and Nebraska and replace them with schools that actually matter in football? Same with the SEC, dump Vandy and Missouri, bring in Florida State and Clemson? I know it won't happen, but at least it would be fair. Some really crappy programs are benefitting just from being in a lucky spot that they have done nothing to earn.
Guess you will have to ask someone that may know the answer to your question then. I definitely wouldn’t want to know who the knife was for. Reminds me of a favorite quote by Will Rogers : “There are three kinds of men. The one that learns by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence for themselves.” Will RogersI have no gf or estranged wife.
Well, something is clearly afoot here...
To test electric fences, when I was around 8 or so, my dad would tell me to grab it ifhe didn’t have a screwdriver. You get used to it after a little while.Guess you will have to ask someone that may know the answer to your question then. I definitely wouldn’t want to know who the knife was for. Reminds me of a favorite quote by Will Rogers : “There are three kinds of men. The one that learns by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence for themselves.” Will Rogers
Yeah Nebraska still has the ratings (but that’s all it has) but who knows for how long. The other two we want around for the lay upsThey’d keep Nebraska. The success isn’t there any more but the fans are. And that’s revenue. The other two would get curbed
Yeah Nebraska still has the ratings (but that’s all it has) but who knows for how long. The other two we want around for the lay ups
I have no gf or estranged wife.
Well, something is clearly afoot here...
Nebraska is a top ten ish rating program, as long as they stay top 20 I’m fine having them. No one expects a CFP spot for them but we have 5/6 other teams to take care of those 2/3 spots. Same for NCAA when you have 16 you really only need 8/9 good ones.Nebraska has the ratings because we all want to check out a train wreck. Eventually, they'll just be another mediocre football team and we'll stop caring. The state of Nebraska isn't going to bring in $100m per year. And they're sure as hell not going to contribute via CFP appearances or NCAA tournament shares.
I wouldn't say they didn't earn it because they're losing which, in turn, makes the other guys look much better. But, if we follow your argument, then there'd have to be losers somewhere else. That's why structuring parity is so important in sports. Becoming irrelevant means loss of fan interest.Just a thought on all this conference realignment: If they could, don't you think the Big Ten would dump Rutgers, Maryland and Nebraska and replace them with schools that actually matter in football? Same with the SEC, dump Vandy and Missouri, bring in Florida State and Clemson? I know it won't happen, but at least it would be fair. Some really crappy programs are benefitting just from being in a lucky spot that they have done nothing to earn.
The NCAA tourney, the big ten has been way off 8/9 good ones. Been one of the weaker leagues the last several years. Generally goes down in a ball of flames first round also.Nebraska is a top ten ish rating program, as long as they stay top 20 I’m fine having them. No one expects a CFP spot for them but we have 5/6 other teams to take care of those 2/3 spots. Same for NCAA when you have 16 you really only need 8/9 good ones.
The BIG isn't dumping Maryland or Rutgers any time soon. Too many cable subscriptions. The Big Ten has generally expanded for subscriptions. The SEC has generally expanded for football quality. Missouri was actually good when they went to the SEC.Just a thought on all this conference realignment: If they could, don't you think the Big Ten would dump Rutgers, Maryland and Nebraska and replace them with schools that actually matter in football? Same with the SEC, dump Vandy and Missouri, bring in Florida State and Clemson? I know it won't happen, but at least it would be fair. Some really crappy programs are benefitting just from being in a lucky spot that they have done nothing to earn.
Maryland and Rutgers yes but not Nebraska. Say what you want about the bug eaters but they are a huge draw.Just a thought on all this conference realignment: If they could, don't you think the Big Ten would dump Rutgers, Maryland and Nebraska and replace them with schools that actually matter in football? Same with the SEC, dump Vandy and Missouri, bring in Florida State and Clemson? I know it won't happen, but at least it would be fair. Some really crappy programs are benefitting just from being in a lucky spot that they have done nothing to earn.