Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

Got some quotes for you last comment about multiple legacy presidents wanting to go back? Would love to read those.

Glad you got to type puppets, I was worried about you during this down period and just assumed you muttered puppets over and over again in the middle of the night to help you sleep.

Expansion has been exactly in line with what the big ten and SEC wanted. If networks wanted someone that the schools didn’t, it wouldn’t get done
If you took a vote of Legacy B10 fans/boosters as well as Legacy B10 Presidents, the vast majority would prefer a 10 school B10 with doubling of the current payouts (resulting from media rights pooling and 7x10 realignment) over the current 18-school dysfunctional clustereff.

Hell, even you would prefer that and if you don't, you have your head up your ass.
 
  • Creative
  • Disagree
Reactions: isu81 and isucy86
If you took a vote of Legacy B10 fans/boosters as well as Legacy B10 Presidents, the vast majority would prefer a 10 school B10 with doubling of the current payouts (resulting from media rights pooling and 7x10 realignment) over the current 18-school dysfunctional clustereff.

Hell, even you would prefer that and if you don't, you have your head up your ass.

But...he isn't saying the Big 10 as in fans wanted this...he is talking about the office of the Big 10...HUGE difference! What fans want really isn't that important at this point...
 
If you took a vote of Legacy B10 fans/boosters as well as Legacy B10 Presidents, the vast majority would prefer a 10 school B10 with doubling of the current payouts (resulting from media rights pooling and 7x10 realignment) over the current 18-school dysfunctional clustereff.

Hell, even you would prefer that and if you don't, you have your head up your ass.
A bit confused as you said the legacy presidents would want this but then have no quotes from them and now have moved the goal posts to taking a vote. Btw the vast majority of big ten fans have no problem with the moves that have been made and wouldn’t trade any potential additional media revenue for other leagues catching up. It’s part of the reason I came to the board to chat about realignment, most big ten fans don’t care as it doesn’t really effect them or has even benefited them with how spread out so many alumni are.

Also if we’re going back to 10 teams which legacy Big10 team are we booting or are we going back and sending Penn state to the east coast again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1UNI2ISU
But...he isn't saying the Big 10 as in fans wanted this...he is talking about the office of the Big 10...HUGE difference! What fans want really isn't that important at this point...
Agreed with what you’re saying but most of the legacy big ten fans also don’t care, now the new 4 schools might feel differently and I do get that.

If they were given a choice expansion probably would have stopped after PSU but once it happened no one was particularly upset
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyfanatic
This is pretty funny. OU season ticket holders are just got a notice that says you have to pay $20,000 donation (in various cases) if you have four season tickets. Probably not the only SEC fan base with same letters, but couldn’t happen to a better fan base. This is in addition to what they are paying now.
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Reactions: NWICY
A bit confused as you said the legacy presidents would want this but then have no quotes from them and now have moved the goal posts to taking a vote. Btw the vast majority of big ten fans have no problem with the moves that have been made and wouldn’t trade any potential additional media revenue for other leagues catching up. It’s part of the reason I came to the board to chat about realignment, most big ten fans don’t care as it doesn’t really effect them or has even benefited them with how spread out so many alumni are.

Also if we’re going back to 10 teams which legacy Big10 team are we booting or are we going back and sending Penn state to the east coast again.
Yeah, typical dumbass B10 fans. Would rather sustain existing revenue advantage instead of doubling/tripling revenues with a reduced revenue advantage. Rational legacy B10 Presidents would vote for the latter with a 10 team conference. No quotes available that I am aware of but none needed for an obvious solution that would benefit all FBS schools. But there were anonymous quotes from multiple B10 ADs who opposed adding the PAC schools and destroying thr PAC in the process of doing so.

The Athletic proposed Northwestern going to the revamped B12 with ISU, KU, KSU, NU, CU, CSU, UU, BYU and Mizzou and that makes sense given their outlier status with other legacy B10 schools. And to make that move worthwhile, they would receive B10 level payouts from the 7x10 pool that would be based, in part, on TV ratings to maintain revenue advantages for the legacy B10 and SEC schools.
 
Yeah, typical dumbass B10 fans. Would rather sustain existing revenue advantage instead of doubling/tripling revenues with a reduced revenue advantage. Rational legacy B10 Presidents would vote for the latter with a 10 team conference. No quotes available that I am aware of but none needed for an obvious solution that would benefit all FBS schools. But there were anonymous quotes from multiple B10 ADs who opposed adding the PAC schools and destroying thr PAC in the process of doing so.

The Athletic proposed Northwestern going to the revamped B12 with ISU, KU, KSU, NU, CU, CSU, UU, BYU and Mizzou and that makes sense given their outlier status with other legacy B10 schools. And to make that move worthwhile, they would receive B10 level payouts from the 7x10 pool that would be based, in part, on TV ratings to maintain revenue advantages for the legacy B10 and SEC schools.
Why on earth would Northwestern agree to go to the Big 12? How does that make sense? They'd be way more of an outlier in the Big 12 than they are in the B1G. Lol.
 
Why on earth would Northwestern agree to go to the Big 12? How does that make sense? They'd be way more of an outlier in the Big 12 than they are in the B1G. Lol.
They are the only private school in the legacy B10 with no significant conference rival so they are an outlier and would be the logical legacy school to leave. And as mentioned earlier, they would receive B10 level payouts (at least doubling their existing payouts) and maintain existing academic/research alliances with non con scheduling preferences with B10 schools.
 
They are the only private school in the legacy B10 with no significant conference rival so they are an outlier and would be the logical legacy school to leave. And as mentioned earlier, they would receive B10 level payouts (at least doubling their existing payouts) and maintain existing academic/research alliances with non con scheduling preferences with B10 schools.
How many private, non-land-grant, academic blueblood universities are there in the Big 12? Who would their significant Big 12 conference rival be?
 
Another example of B10/Fox destruction of Washington State:


First of all, very nice arena.

However, Pac, WCC, etc., Wash. State is the most remote major state unviersity in the country, and that includes Penn State, Auburn and Iowa State!

It is out there. Way out there. I literally wandered upon a Rodeo when I was driving around the Palouse with a WSU friend of mine.
 
How many private, non-land-grant, academic blueblood universities are there in the Big 12? Who would their significant Big 12 conference rival be?
1) BYU. So NW would have a peer in the B12.
2) They don't have one in the B10 after all these years. Maybe they develop one in the B12.
 
They are the only private school in the legacy B10 with no significant conference rival so they are an outlier and would be the logical legacy school to leave. And as mentioned earlier, they would receive B10 level payouts (at least doubling their existing payouts) and maintain existing academic/research alliances with non con scheduling preferences with B10 schools.

Isn't the benefit of having a private school in your conference is that it protects the conference from having to share their financials from Freedom of Information requests? Or something like that?
 
Washington State has never drawn. Ever. Even when they're good. Pullman is in the middle of nowhere, and has a population of about 30,000.

Last 10 years of average attendance:

2025-4007
2024-4137
2023-3341
2022-3133
2021-COVID
2020-3165
2019-2318
2018-2886
2017-3001
2016-2856

You can argue that being in the WCC HELPED attendance.

And absolute LOL that BYU and Northwestern are 'peers'...
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlySpartan
Washington State has never drawn. Ever. Even when they're good. Pullman is in the middle of nowhere, and has a population of about 30,000.

Last 10 years of average attendance:

2025-4007
2024-4137
2023-3341
2022-3133
2021-COVID
2020-3165
2019-2318
2018-2886
2017-3001
2016-2856

You can argue that being in the WCC HELPED attendance.

And absolute LOL that BYU and Northwestern are 'peers'...
It makes you wonder how they ever made it to a major D1 power conference in the first place. They seem like being in the old MTW would have been a better fit for them all along, probably them and OSU too.

Hell at this point you almost wonder if they should have been in the Big Sky all along.

I guess they have 20K students on the main campus, so there is that.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: 1UNI2ISU
BYU is nowhere close to being an academic blueblood at the level of Northwestern. Lol.
BYU is top 100 level university, public or private. Not at the level of NW but certainly no slouch.

The primary point here is that in a 7x10 model that maximizes CFB media revenues and doesn't destroy 20-25 more schools, one legacy school has to be moved out of the B10 and the obvious choice is NW for multiple reasons including geographic.
 
Last edited:
BYU is top 100 level university, public or private. Not at the level of NW but certainly no slouch.

The primary point here is that in a 7x10 model that maximizes CFB media revenues and doesn't destroy 20-25 more schools, one legacy school has to be moved out of the B10 and the obvious choice is NW for multiple reasons including geographic.
The school that sits 4 miles from the league office needs to be moved for geographic reasons?
 
  • Agree
  • Haha
Reactions: Cyclonsin and Gonzo
BYU is top 100 level university, public or private. Not at the level of NW but certainly no slouch.

The primary point here is that in a 7x10 model that maximizes CFB media revenues and doesn't destroy 20-25 more schools, one legacy school has to be moved out of the B10 and the obvious choice is NW for multiple reasons including geographic.
If you're going by US News national university rankings BYU is #110, falling in line squarely behind the likes of Iowa and Missouri. Northwestern is #7. Lol.

You've had some weird takes on here, but this may be your weirdest yet.