Prohm Fired

Die4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2010
14,972
15,857
113
Pollard's hires have been pretty air tight in the past. It's not like he's blowing smoke on that point.

As far as flat out saying ISU does not have donors do buyouts, it would be a dumb thing to lie about because the severance payout to Prohm will show up on the books at some point, and he knows that.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: aauummm and Lineup

whatthewhat

Active Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 7, 2019
110
155
43
63
folks go ahead and bash me for being naive, but I watched JP's video message and I'll take Pollard at his word and believe no donor money was involved.
I don't think that it is naive to believe JP. But JP does want to control how this entire process is viewed. Some information may come out in the future that wasn't known, but JP is going to set the narrative for how the process is viewed in its current state.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dahliaclone

Urbandale2013

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2018
4,789
5,930
113
30
Urbandale
Pollard's hires have been pretty air tight in the past. It's not like he's blowing smoke on that point.

As far as flat out saying ISU does not have donors do buyouts, it would be a dumb thing to lie about because the severance payout to Prohm will show up on the books at some point, and he knows that.
I believe him for the most part on not believing stuff out there. That said some stuff is always going to leak. Also I don't think people understand how money can be moved around. If donors did pony up for the buyout it isn't just going to be a check from them to Prohm. It also isn't going to be just the exact amount of the buyout. I guarantee there was at least some sort of donor involvement in paying the buyout. To what extent and via what methods only Pollard knows.
 

DSM4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 4, 2006
2,589
3,213
113
Altoona, IA
I believe him for the most part on not believing stuff out there. That said some stuff is always going to leak. Also I don't think people understand how money can be moved around. If donors did pony up for the buyout it isn't just going to be a check from them to Prohm. It also isn't going to be just the exact amount of the buyout. I guarantee there was at least some sort of donor involvement in paying the buyout. To what extent and via what methods only Pollard knows.

"Creative financing." You have to wonder what that means.
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
I can tell on here who has held positions of leadership in real life where they have to control a narrative vs. those who haven't. What Jamie said was clearly trying to control a narrative.. very, very obvious. He doesn't like the news that leaked. Some might be true and some might be false. I doubt it's all false. With many people in a department plus donors, it's inevitable that things leak.

And don't get me wrong. If I were in Jamie's shoes, I would have said exactly what he said. This is common 101 management/PR stuff.
It’s amazing how many people slurp up Jamie’s bs
 

cycloneworld

Facebook Knows All
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 20, 2006
30,076
22,427
113
Urbandale, IA
I can tell on here who has held positions of leadership in real life where they have to control a narrative vs. those who haven't. What Jamie said was clearly trying to control a narrative.. very, very obvious. He doesn't like the news that leaked. Some might be true and some might be false. I doubt it's all false. With many people in a department plus donors, it's inevitable that things leak.

And don't get me wrong. If I were in Jamie's shoes, I would have said exactly what he said. This is common 101 management/PR stuff.

Strongly disagree. "Controlling a narrative" does not equal outright lying about things. Pollard was very clear this is going to be a financial hit to the AD but made the decision anyway. Again, why would he outright lie about this? Makes no sense.

Spin is one thing. Lying is completely different. And assuming there is a paper trail with everything, he's not going to blatantly lie about donors picking up the tab.

Occum's Razor - the simplest solution is that posters here were wrong about donors stepping up to full cover buyouts.
 

Bestaluckcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 25, 2009
2,174
1,611
113
I think the major weakness in the JP using a major donor then lying about is it means he would have to give up some control as to who we would hire. History has shown Jaimie doesn’t like to share these hiring decisions even with our university president. He likes to keep control.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Lineup

allfourcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 26, 2012
6,950
2,983
113
It’s amazing how many people slurp up Jamie’s bs

I don't look at it as bs at all. Calculated, smart wording (like creative financing). I'd go out on a limb and say he's done more for his university than most other AD's that have much better resources. He loves the Cyclones and I can get behind a guy like that.
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
I don't look at it as bs at all. Calculated, smart wording (like creative financing). I'd go out on a limb and say he's done more for his university than most other AD's that have much better resources. He loves the Cyclones and I can get behind a guy like that.
“If you haven’t heard it from me it’s not true” is BS.
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,132
7,732
113
Dubuque
He is having great success where he is with all athletes returning next year and a chance to coach his son. Looks like he could ride that for another year as the opportunity to make a P6 jump will still be around

Devries might be very interested in moving from Drake after this year. He has been at Drake 3 years, so it's not like he's pulling a Medved.

Also Tucker hasn't enrolled yet at Drake. So it might make sense for Darren to take a P5 job and Tucker start out academically at his school for 4 years.

Drake is pretty loaded, so they should be competitive to make the NCAA's next year. But no guarantees in life. If Darren can sign a $12-15M contract at a new school, hard to pass up that opportunity.
 

CloneJD

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2020
1,282
1,998
113
A lot of posters seem upset the info on the premium board shared with them was flat out wrong.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Brandon

Urbandale2013

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2018
4,789
5,930
113
30
Urbandale
Strongly disagree. "Controlling a narrative" does not equal outright lying about things. Pollard was very clear this is going to be a financial hit to the AD but made the decision anyway. Again, why would he outright lie about this? Makes no sense.

Spin is one thing. Lying is completely different. And assuming there is a paper trail with everything, he's not going to blatantly lie about donors picking up the tab.

Occum's Razor - the simplest solution is that posters here were wrong about donors stepping up to full cover buyouts.
Again I think it’s in the middle. I don’t think one donor wrote a $5 million check. That said I would be shocked if there wasn’t some donor involvement.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cycloneworld