Players Era

Every school participating gets $1M, but the top 4 get additional money. The format isn't fair to decide the top 4 when a lot of money is on the line.
Every school gets $1M-ish. They've backed off the claim that everybody is getting it. Also sounds like there's a school or two that isn't taking any money and the figures for the 'championship games' keep moving all over the place.
 
Yeah it is odd. If Bama beats UNLV by 20 it doesn't mean they are better than ISU beating St Johns by 4. The margin of victory at least needs a strength of schedule. Although I feel like TV gets worked into this mix more than anything.
I kind of like it. It’s honest if nothing else…and feels like true NIL. They’re basically saying keep playing your starters and make it fun for the crowds…and we’ll reward you with the opportunity to play in the championship game and win more money. They’re basically saying also give players extra money for being involved in charitable things, signing autographs, etc. Arguably that conflicts with trying to win/being focused on the games…but it’s again at least honest. College sports are way more about money than they have ever been and not surprisingly Vegas is owning that.
 
This thing being clear as mud seems like an unforced error. Why wouldn’t your event your pumping millions into to be clear in how the hell it even works?
 
This thing being clear as mud seems like an unforced error. Why wouldn’t your event your pumping millions into to be clear in how the hell it even works?
I think Vegas know their money is going to come from advertising dollars…and they can promise high interest/high viewership by building it this way. It’s different…but sort of brilliant.
 
Who gets paid? Just the champ?

Also, the tourney website is terrible.
Everyone gets paid. each player that seems the floor gets their part of the money so if ISU gets 2 mil for being in top 4 and 10 players play then they each get 200k after game 3.
 
Looks like we gotta win and then have Kansas and Baylor both lose for us to get into one of the top 2 final games
To me it looks like the most likely scenario is Michigan plays either Houston or Gonzaga for the championship….and they would obviously hope for Michigan vs. Houston. That would leave Gonzaga vs. the best of KU, Baylor, or Iowa State. I’d take a game against Gonzaga in a heartbeat. Obviously would always like to play for a “championship”, but I can’t say I mind that setup.
 
Since this is a one year thing they really should have just paid teams for each win. And then next year when it's presumably a real bracket they can pay out the champion.
The championship game matchup is so arbitrary it is total BS. Why are we punished for playing a team that's our near equal (according to kenpom)? Will we get extra fake points for lipsey being out the last 2 minutes? Meanwhile Tennessee played a 132nd ranked rutgers so no sh!t they blew them out.
 
Why even get bent outta shape about it? We're gonna get paid. We're gonna get three games. And it looks like a next year invite.
I think this was setup as a way to circumvent current MTE (needs a champion) rules. I also believe things change next year to a somewhat bracket oriented format over a longer timeframe. Next year we can complain that it took too long, our matchup was bad, we got jobbed in our payout, etc., but for now just be happy that we're a part of it.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: MeanDean
Since this is a one year thing they really should have just paid teams for each win. And then next year when it's presumably a real bracket they can pay out the champion.
The championship game matchup is so arbitrary it is total BS. Why are we punished for playing a team that's our near equal (according to kenpom)? Will we get extra fake points for lipsey being out the last 2 minutes? Meanwhile Tennessee played a 132nd ranked rutgers so no sh!t they blew them out.
I get that, but I think for the most part it will shake out and seem more fair after today. They’re more or less just skipping one round. At most there will be 5 undefeated teams after today. It may not be completely fair, but I think it’s reasonable for them to be able to guess who the two best teams might be…and again, it really just gives them the ability to put the two teams they want in the championship (for advertising dollars). If it were an actual championship, I’d be mad too…but I don’t think this greatly matters.
 
Another dumb aspect of this format is that even if we somehow smoke Creighton without Lipsey, Baylor and the Auburn/Michigan winner will know exactly what they need to win by to finish ahead of us since we're playing first. I don't mind something coming along and replacing traditional MTEs, but it's silly they're trying to pass this off as a "championship".
 
Why even get bent outta shape about it? We're gonna get paid. We're gonna get three games. And it looks like a next year invite.
I think this was setup as a way to circumvent current MTE (needs a champion) rules. I also believe things change next year to a somewhat bracket oriented format over a longer timeframe. Next year we can complain that it took too long, our matchup was bad, we got jobbed in our payout, etc., but for now just be happy that we're a part of it.
Yes, the 'have to have a champion' rule goes away next year as does any maximum number of games in an MTE rule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Acer88