R.E.M.
Fanatic Phase: 1985-1990-ish
Meh Period: 1995 and beyond
I never reached a “dislike” point with R.E.M., it was a slow fade until it didn't sound fresh anymore.
Basically, I have little connection to the last one-third of the group's output. I assume that means I missed some nuggets along the way, but, I’ve just never been motivated enough to dive back into it. I’ve caught stray tracks here & there, but “Monster” was the last album that contains multiple tracks I liked (and still like to some extent).
A random sample from the later period, this one from “Reveal,” three LPs after Monster. The video is unique and certainly "REM-cool," but, without the visual, I’m not sure I’d care much about the song, compared to anything similar from the group's first decade.
Mentioned it prior but also listened to bands like Korn Limp Bizkit Staind etc. in high school.
They were so stupid and Aaron Lewis's solo stuff is too.
Dashboard Confessional also comes to mind.
I'd have to go with Bruce Springsteen, and Dave Matthews. Used to really like them; now not so much. No music examples, sorry.
Dave Matthews Band was huge and seemed awesome when they blew up in the 90s. I've always been a music nerd who likes jazz and other types of music, so it seemed like a marvelous new era of music. Then their follow up albums were just ok, and then the newness wore off and they didn't seem so great anymore.
I'll still listen to a song if it comes on the radio, but I'm not pulling out my DMB CDs any time soon or going to an overpriced music festival to see them.
Add me to the list of misguided youth who once thought Korn and Limp Bizkit were entertaining. Fred Durst is the douchiest of d-bags. You can probably add Marilyn Manson to the list as well.
Dave Matthews Band was huge and seemed awesome when they blew up in the 90s. I've always been a music nerd who likes jazz and other types of music, so it seemed like a marvelous new era of music. Then their follow up albums were just ok, and then the newness wore off and they didn't seem so great anymore.
I'll still listen to a song if it comes on the radio, but I'm not pulling out my DMB CDs any time soon or going to an overpriced music festival to see them.
I'd have to go with Bruce Springsteen, and Dave Matthews. Used to really like them; now not so much. No music examples, sorry.
I'm getting a bit tangential here but here are my feelings about DMB.Dave Matthews Band was huge and seemed awesome when they blew up in the 90s. I've always been a music nerd who likes jazz and other types of music, so it seemed like a marvelous new era of music. Then their follow up albums were just ok, and then the newness wore off and they didn't seem so great anymore.
I'll still listen to a song if it comes on the radio, but I'm not pulling out my DMB CDs any time soon or going to an overpriced music festival to see them.
I'm getting a bit tangential here but here are my feelings about DMB.
I'd like DMB if DM wasn't part of it. Or at least if he didn't sing. I guess I just find his voice and vocal inflections to be annoying.
This example almost slipped my mind:
Soul Asylum
Caveat: I still think the band is unfairly pigeonholed for its breakthrough hit, “Runaway Train.” Of course, the video was massively overplayed, and for me the song was lukewarm water, especially side-by-side with the group’s catalog to that point.
I now realize, I might’ve unwittingly participated in the backlash; I haven’t consumed or pursued anything new by S.A. since “Let Your Dim Light Shine” (and the band has released 4 studio albums since then -- I couldn't name a single song from any of 'em).
The last definitive track from my frequent-rotation Soul Asylum phase is this (it still holds up for me today). From the same album as “Runaway Train.” Isn't it ironic, don't ya think?
For my taste(s), if I invented personal genres, DMB would be in the Mixed Bag category. Some of it, even a few that were grossly overplayed, sound fine. Other stuff doesn't move the needle for me at all. (Plenty of music artists could fit the mixed-bag niche for me. That's a topic for another day).
I'm several years older than what would've been typical target age for the period of Korn, Bizkit, Manson, so I was less likely to fall bass-ackward into digging them only to regret it later. (Each has a few things I thought were OK, at the time). That made me try to think of my examples of "future embarrassment music" would be.
Kiss is probably one case that's similar, but I've gone kind of back-and-forth about that. First, I abandoned it, then maybe 10 years later, I got briefly nostalgic for it (I even bought a discount used copy of Alive II on vinyl). When Kiss regrouped w/ makeup in '90s, it was kinda cool, but I didn't have all that much interest.
"KIss My Ass" tribute album had a few worthy cuts, actually that was more intriguing to me than Makeup-Kiss Mark 2. Garth Brooks performed a song for it, for chrissakes (Hard Luck Woman). And it's actually Good!
But I digress. I'll try to think of other stuff from my 20/20 Hindsight of Regret.
As for waxing artist, I have Beck. Back in the 1990's I tried to like Beck, but it didn't take. Now I'm a big fan.
As a longtime Beck enthusiast, I'm curious, was there a specific turning point when you latched onto his music? After you became a fan, do you embrace the 90s stuff retrospectively, even though it didn't resonate at the time?