***Official portal tracker thread***

Based on our depth chart, our three starting LBs were listed at 235 (2) or 240 (1). That size is not at all rare for an NFL LB, let alone “very rare.” Just google the 2025 LB draft rankings, the first list that pops up has all of the Top 5 LBs between 235 and 245.

Or just look up an NFL roster. I checked the Chiefs - 5 of the 6 active LBs are between 234 and 240 lbs.

But weight is only one factor. In the NFL there is a premium on speed and the guys on the draft rankings are freaks from a height/weight/speed combination. Only a very small percentage of college players make it to the NFL.

Sure Iowa State had good sized LB's, but not NFL LB speed at the same size. With Jimmy Rogers and 4-2 his approach looks to prioritize speed over size. But we'll also have 4 DL to occupy/disrupt the opposing OL.

Different approaches, but both work for each coaches system.
 
But weight is only one factor. In the NFL there is a premium on speed and the guys on the draft rankings are freaks from a height/weight/speed combination. Only a very small percentage of college players make it to the NFL.

Sure Iowa State had good sized LB's, but not NFL LB speed at the same size. With Jimmy Rogers and 4-2 his approach looks to prioritize speed over size. But we'll also have 4 DL to occupy/disrupt the opposing OL.

Different approaches, but both work for each coaches system.
Tackling also. Our backers were slow and poor tacklers.
 
Tackling also. Our backers were slow and poor tacklers.

I'll be curious how well guys like Bacon, Ebel, etc. play at their next stops. Do they follow Campbell or maybe look to play in more traditional 4-3 or even 4-2 defenses.

IMO the 3-3 front put a lot of stress on the LB's. Having to be uber aggressive to fill run gaps, but also get back on pass plays. There were running around with their heads cut off. Whereas, the ISU DB's were playing in controlled chaos.
 
I'll be curious how well guys like Bacon, Ebel, etc. play at their next stops. Do they follow Campbell or maybe look to play in more traditional 4-3 or even 4-2 defenses….
They’ll follow Campbell if they are on the Ped St poach li$t. How much they play is another question.
 
I had a squawk friend of mine send me 7 instagram post about how ISU has 16 players left on the roster and 42 in the portal. This is exactly why hawkeye fans are my favorite. They finally have something to rejoice at in their athletics, and it wasn't even a victory over ISU LMAO
most of the negative stuff floating around is from iowa fans or iowa trolls wanting to make ISU look bad and this is their hayday.. and for the most part its working (coopers tweet), shows how gullible the gen pop is unfortunately..
 
I'll be curious how well guys like Bacon, Ebel, etc. play at their next stops. Do they follow Campbell or maybe look to play in more traditional 4-3 or even 4-2 defenses.

IMO the 3-3 front put a lot of stress on the LB's. Having to be uber aggressive to fill run gaps, but also get back on pass plays. There were running around with their heads cut off. Whereas, the ISU DB's were playing in controlled chaos.
Bacon is more middle backer in a 4-3. His hole filling and edge setting are weak. He can tackle, usually from behind because of poor anticipation. Ebel wanted to throw shoulders and not wrap up so you would see backs either bounce or spin off and and keep going.

Many people praised their improvement over the last 2-3 games, part of it was a drop in the opponent quality. The middle backer in our D always appears better because of sheer tackle volume and having citrus playing infront of rhem.
 
But weight is only one factor. In the NFL there is a premium on speed and the guys on the draft rankings are freaks from a height/weight/speed combination. Only a very small percentage of college players make it to the NFL.

Sure Iowa State had good sized LB's, but not NFL LB speed at the same size. With Jimmy Rogers and 4-2 his approach looks to prioritize speed over size. But we'll also have 4 DL to occupy/disrupt the opposing OL.

Different approaches, but both work for each coaches system.
Obviously weight is only one of many factors that determine if a LB is NFL caliber. I was just correcting the poster who misstated the weight of NFL LBs.

This convo was triggered by a post speculating that Rogers ran off our LB corps. I don’t believe he did that, for multiple reasons.
 
Agree. Of course, humor is subjective so there will be some people who find Williams more funny and others that think Hassel is funnier. It's all subjective and neither are wrong. I think Williams humor is very surface level, which can be funny at times. Hassel has a dry, cutting humor that I find very funny, regardless of who it is.
CW has a sense of humor? He should roll that out once in a while!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: andybernard
Pretty much all our guys that played are 4-3 middles. They are gap fillers. The safeties are alley runners and tacklers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: isufbcurt
Obviously weight is only one of many factors that determine if a LB is NFL caliber. I was just correcting the poster who misstated the weight of NFL LBs.

This convo was triggered by a post speculating that Rogers ran off our LB corps. I don’t believe he did that, for multiple reasons.

IMO Rogers probably did run off existing roster LB's for a few reasons:
  1. Rogers looking for more speed than guys on current roster.
  2. Rogers not willing to pay what players wanted.
  3. With a 4-2 defense, just don't need the same # of LB's on the roster vs. 3-3 defense.
  4. Rogers wanting to develop/pay younger players. Guys who can grow with his program vs. guys who start in 2026 and then graduate.
  5. Rogers plans on bringing in LB's who Rogers feels are an upgrade based on his system/approach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GP4ISU
IMO Rogers probably did run off existing roster LB's for a few reasons:
  1. Rogers looking for more speed than guys on current roster.
  2. Rogers not willing to pay what players wanted.
  3. With a 4-2 defense, just don't need the same # of LB's on the roster vs. 3-3 defense.
  4. Rogers wanting to develop/pay younger players. Guys who can grow with his program vs. guys who start in 2026 and then graduate.
  5. Rogers plans on bringing in LB's who Rogers feels are an upgrade based on his system/approach.
Bacon and Ebel were gone from the jump from what several here heard. Can't speak to the others and not saying it wouldn't have happened eventually. But not sure Rogers "ran these guys off" in the true sense of that term.
 
Money!

That's just a reality. Iowa State has around $13M to spend on players. We know PSU is spending $30M on players and I would bet PSU is inline with the other teams in the top half of Big10/SEC. So think about it and I am just spitballing:
  • PSU Approach with $30M Annual Budget:
    • Pay 10 Elite Players: $12M (Avg. $1.2M/player)
    • Pay 20 Next Tier Players: $8M (Avg. $400k/player)
    • Pay 30 Next Tier Players $6M (Avg. $200k/player)
    • Pay 40 Next Tier Players $4M (Avg. $100k/player)
  • Iowa State Approach with $13M Annual Budget:
    • Pay 10 Elite Players: $5M (Avg. $500K/player)
    • Pay 20 Next Tier Players: $3M (Avg. $150K/player)
    • Pay 30 Next Tier Players: $3M (Avg. $100k/player)
    • Pay 40 Next Tier Players: $2M (Avg. $50k/player)
The above is simplistic and schools could budget by position group, or carve out a specific budget for HS recruits. I am sure there is a lot of nuance that GM's and Head Coaches have to approach roster building in 2026.

But if your a player at Iowa State (whether top-end starter, solid starter, 2nd stringer or young player) it's easy to see where agents can paint a picture of riches. Especially if a player is confident in their abilities or has a proven track record of success.

For example, if I'm a solid starter at Iowa State making $150k and Texas A&M offers me $400k, why wouldn't I take the money if I'm confident I can push for playing time with the Aggies. Or maybe the Aggies offer me $250K, is $100K more worth it even if I'm bench depth and a special teams player?
Does anyone have a good explanation on how Penn state is going to 'Spend" 30 million dollars. The entire athletic department is 20 million cap. The extra 10-15 million assuming some other sports are supported under the cap needs to be real NIL deals (deals out side the university) that are approved by a audit committee. When does this Audit committee review and approve? is it ahead of time where they can then promise this ? Are they deals set up separately that will be reviewed at a later date with risk not being approved?
 
Bacon and Ebel were gone from the jump from what several here heard. Can't speak to the others and not saying it wouldn't have happened eventually. But not sure Rogers "ran these guys off" in the true sense of that term.
Agree that Bacon and Ebel were gone regardless likely. From a system perspective, it's pretty easy to see why Goodwin and Willich are staying and guys like Brezina and Klosterman haven't. Can't be slow and play in this system, need to be fast and cover some territory.
 
I had a squawk friend of mine send me 7 instagram post about how ISU has 16 players left on the roster and 42 in the portal. This is exactly why hawkeye fans are my favorite. They finally have something to rejoice at in their athletics, and it wasn't even a victory over ISU LMAO

So when ISU wins next season their tears will be twice as delicious
 
Hummel was an under appreciated 6' 1'" 220 linebacker who would have fit into the new system. Lateral speed and wrestling instincts. HE ADDED 10 to 15 lbs in pros. Gerry Vaughn was 5' 11" 230 to 235 with great lateral speed and instincts. Unique body. LOW center of gravity but smart and heady and minimal mistakes.Underappreciated. SHOULD HAVE probably played at 223 to 225. Marcel Spears would have been a flat out STAR in the new system. A GREAT linebacker. ATHLETIC. 6'1" 215 lbs.