What I meant was referring to every school that loses a coach, that goes on to play in a bowl etc. Not every school ever that loses a coach plays in one. I can see how I wrote it might confuse you.
That being said, I have compared it to those schools Like wazzu many times, just some on here are so dense, like you, that cant understand that, so I tried to come up with a way you might understand, but obviously you cant. But tell me how a coach and a player, both getting paid to do a job, is different than any other job, other than they apparently can refuse to do their job and quit, to turn their back on their so called loyalty, and still get paid and still have fans like you, kiss their ass for it.
That being said 99% of all schools that ever lost a coach and qualified for a bowl, still went on to play in said bowl regardless of losing that coach. But you go ahead and put the likes of KSU on a pedestal to try to emulate, if that works for you, I sure as hell am not going to.
How many of our players, announced they were leaving when they voted? Sure they have now, weeks after they made up their mind to quit on ISU. Its almost like the Wazzu players havent announced yet because they were busy preparing and working for their bowl. Its almost like keeping players active and working is a good way to keep them involved with the program, which may work out to them deciding to stay, rather than letting them quit, with the only thing for them to do is contemplate leaving.
As far as the rest of your BS, I seem to have an awful lot of likes and agreements on the subject. I at least have come up with actual real tangible reasons and evidence of schools etc that have made it work. You have just come up with hypotheticals like what if there were no coaches, what if there were no players, what if there were no DBs. But its different at ISU than it has ever been anywhere else that ever lost coach, its just so hard, you cant compare ISU to any other school in this situation because no one has ever had it as bad as ISU....Bla bla bla.Well I can do the same, what if there were plenty to play? What if we had plenty of players to play, what if we had plenty of coaches to coach, what if, what if?
Keep in mind I havent resorted in calling anyone names because I didnt like their argument, because I didnt agree with them. You have done so mulitiple times, which does not make your argument any better, as far as I am concerned the minute you resort to insults, and name calling, you lost. But you do you, its not like I would ever take moral lessons from you as someone who accepts and celebrates quitters, this is precisely the issue with people today, people are fine with quitting at the first sign of adversity, people all want a participation trophy.
That all being said, feel free to put me on ignore, if you dont like it. I cant do it for you.
Nothing you wrote confused me - not all programs that lose a coach & qualify for a bowl end up going - that has already been pointed out to you in this thread.
I ain't reading the rest of all that, happy for you, though. Or sad that happened.
