You have to give Barnett a little bit of slack since he came into the game cold and wasn't playing with the starters... BUT... you also have to realize if you are Barnett that this could be the one chance you have to prove you should start, and so you have to be spot on, and he was FAR from that.
FootballinTexas remarked about how we can't have Jantz turning the ball over every game, but I didn't see anything from Barnett to tell me he'd be any better at not turning it over? His passes were more inaccurate than Steele's, he had a bad INT himself... AND... he did fumble once out of bounds, but I think he was down?
I think what last night showed if anything was that the coaching staff got it right when they made Steele the starter this year. Does he still make some bad mistakes, yes, but I don't see another QB on this roster that would be any better at eliminating the turnovers either.
If JB is in the game, opposing defenses are just going to put 8 or 9 guys in the box like Rutgers did in the bowl game last year, and dare us to beat them throwing the ball. Steele at least makes teams have to defend the pass too.
As Chris W. has mentioned, if not for a few bad throws, Steele would be outstanding thus far. Over 70% completion rate is amazing. He is the guy, no question. But I do feel good that if he were to go down, that JB or Richardson could do the job.
I made the point about the TO's because he is our starter. That was not a JB vs Steele comment. I'm looking at our conference and we need 3 more wins. No other "starter" has TO's like our guy. That's all I was saying. If we're gonna get 3 more we can't average 2 TO's per game by our "starter".