Seldens dunk had the hype factor that's for sure!This hurts them big time, he really impressed late in the year, I really liked him during their 2 big 12 tourney games. He had the dunk of the tourney, until Seldon's nasty dunk a day later.
Seldens dunk had the hype factor that's for sure!This hurts them big time, he really impressed late in the year, I really liked him during their 2 big 12 tourney games. He had the dunk of the tourney, until Seldon's nasty dunk a day later.
....ISU has a good culture for transfers. ...
In DeAndre Kane's words, we are "FocusTown." Also, we were the original TransferU, before TransferU was cool.What constitutes a good culture for transfers?
What constitutes a good culture for transfers?
ISU nationally has a rep of taking players who had rough patches at their previous schools and getting them to succeed in Ames. Evidenced by consecuative NCOY awards. Prohm has continued the tradition with Burton last year and has a good chance this year with Jackson.
National media still references ISU with transfer success.
Just today...
@JonRothstein Travis Ford is using the same model at Saint Louis that Fred Hoiberg used at Iowa State. Billikens building for big jump in year two.
What do you mean by rough patches? Jackson is a JUCO. Not really the same. I would say this years equivalent are Holden, Bowie and Babb.
ISU nationally has a rep of taking players who had rough patches at their previous schools and getting them to succeed in Ames. Evidenced by consecuative NCOY awards. Prohm has continued the tradition with Burton last year and has a good chance this year with Jackson.
National media still references ISU with transfer success.
Just today...
@JonRothstein Travis Ford is using the same model at Saint Louis that Fred Hoiberg used at Iowa State. Billikens building for big jump in year two.
The "Transfer U" thing is fading for two reasons. Fred is gone, and now there are several successful programs routinely re-loading by taking transfers.
Our last 3 transfers have not been highly recruited (Holden, Babb, Bowie). They are more role player types, so I'm not sure we are still thought as a top destination for transfers anymore.
Very few of the transfers we got under Fred were highly touted. Royce was the only highly ranked one really.This. It was fun while it lasted, and we'll still get them in here, but the top transfer school thing left with Fred. And quite honestly, even if Fred was still here, it would probably be the same case with the amount of top programs now opening up their doors more for transfers.
Very few of the transfers we got under Fred were highly touted. Royce was the only highly ranked one really.
The "Transfer U" thing is fading for two reasons. Fred is gone, and now there are several successful programs routinely re-loading by taking transfers.
Our last 3 transfers have not been highly recruited (Holden, Babb, Bowie). They are more role player types, so I'm not sure we are still thought as a top destination for transfers anymore.
Very few of the transfers we got under Fred were highly touted. Royce was the only highly ranked one really.
Transfer U is a real thing and that's who we were from 2010-2012. Then everyone started swagger-jackin' Fred's moves :smile:. It also doesn't help that 600 kids are transferring these days either. And it really is a market, almost like free agency. Much less work than recruiting (hints why Fred liked it) and typically they want to make a quick pick of which school they will attend next.I don't think Transfer U was ever a thing, and it's bothers me when people say that. I pay quite a bit of attention to CBB for gambling, and I don't think ISU has really stood apart as a transfer destination except for one season. Also, it bothers me when people call it a market, because if it's a market, it's still not a fair market.
What do you mean by rough patches? Jackson is a JUCO. Not really the same. I would say this years equivalent are Holden, Bowie and Babb.
Transfer U is a real thing and that's who we were from 2010-2012....Much less work than recruiting (hints why Fred liked it)...
Junior college kids and other transfers still require some recruiting effort. But, 4 jucos/transfers just moved on from the 2015/16 roster rotation, and there are currently 5 so far for the 2016/17 rotation, with 1 scholarship still open. That's a lot of playing time for short-timer upper classmen players that were not recruited out of high school. Fred left Prohm with roster problems because he never weened the team off the transfer train. Whether that is good or bad or otherwise is subject to debate with a broader scope of only wins/losses. Remains to be seen whether Prohm will continue the practice once he's had a couple years.