This times 10000....eh, I can't type the requisite number of 0s so I'll just stop there.
Seriously, one of Hoiberg's "failures" was his willingness to let Niang "create" from the 3 point line. Where some coaches fail is the continued belief in the fallacy of letting a "well-rounded" player consistently create in all facets of the game. For his position, Niang is ADEPT (not great...big difference) at handling the ball. He is a pretty good, though not great outside shooter. Where is EXCEPTIONAL however is around the rim. This is where the coach should look to utilize the player (first) with the option of using the other skills when the game/possessional situation dictated.
One of the biggest changes under Prohm has been getting Niang back to being around the basket. I will never forget the triple OT OSU game in which Hoiberg let a dominating 1st half post performance turn into a disastrous perimeter chuck fest ladened with TOs (Niang). When trying to create from the perimeter his lack of natural foot speed becomes a problem and he either travels, dribbles it off his foot, or chucks up a quick 3. The need for Niang to create SELECTIVELY from the perimeter still exists, as it helps draw defenders to him and opens up the lane for teammates. But Niang is a bonified AA player when his *** is near the block. NOBODY has a better 10-12 foot game than Niang. I think Prohm understands this better than Fred did.